An OWL Ontology of Fundamental Legal Concepts

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

Volumn 152, Issue , 2006, Pages 101-110

  Rubino, Rossella ^a   Rotolo, Antonino ^a   Sartor, Giovanni ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

legal concepts; ontology; OWL

Indexed keywords

BIRDS; SEMANTICS;

DEONTIC; EUROPEAN PROGRAM; LEGAL CONCEPTS; LEGAL KNOWLEDGE; ONTOLOGY'S; OWL; OWL ONTOLOGIES; POWER; SEMANTIC ACCESS; SEMANTIC RELATIONS;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 85139025886     PISSN: 09226389     EISSN: 18798314     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (8)

1. G. Antoniou, F. van Harmelen: A Semantic Web Primer. MIT Press 2004
2. J. Delgado, I. Gallego, S. Llorente, Garcia, R.: IPROnto: An Ontology for Digital Rights Management. JURIX 2003 Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 106, IOS Press, 2003.
3. W. N. Hohfeld: Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning. I. Yale Law Journal 23 (1913), 16–59.
4. W. N. Hohfeld: Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning. II. Yale Law Journal 26 (1917), 710–770.
5. N. F. Noy, D. L. McGuinness: Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology. Stanford Knowledge Systems Laboratory Technical Report KSL-01-05 and Stanford Medical Informatics Technical Report SMI-2001-0880, March 2001.
6. G. Sartor: Legal Reasoning: A Cognitive Approach to the Law. Berlin: Springer (2005). (Part. 1. Legal Reasoning and Legal Rationality, pp. 1-385: Part. II. Legal Logic, pp. 397–792. Bibliography and references: pp. 793–844).
7. G. Sartor: Fundamental Legal Concepts: A Teleological Characterisation, Artificial Intelligence and Law, to be published.
8. M. K. Smith, C. Welty, D. L. McGuinness: OWL Web Ontology Language Guide. W3C Recommendation 10 February 2004. http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-guide-20040210/