Undermining Science: Suppression and Distortion in the Bush Administration

Undermining Science: Suppression and Distortion in the Bush Administration

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1-203

  Shulman, Seth ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85204515101     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (116)

1. “Restoring Scientific Integrity in Policymaking,” February 18, 2004, sign-on letter available at the website of the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), www.ucsusa.org.
2. UCS report, Scientific Integrity in Policy-making: An Investigation into the Bush Administration’s Misuse of Science, updated version, March 2004.
3. “Uses and Abuses of Science,” editorial, New York Times, February 23, 2004
4. “The Science Adviser’s Rejoinder,” editorial, New York Times, April 10, 2004.
5. Dana Milbank, “For Bush, Facts Are Malleable,” Washington Post, October 22, 2002.
6. “Majority Believe White House Misleads Public, Poll Shows,” Wall Street Journal Online, November 23, 2005
7. U.S. Office of Science and Technology Policy, John H. Marburger III, “Response to the Union of Concerned Scientists’ February 2004 Document” April 2, 2004; available at www.ostp.gov.
8. Richard C. Lewontin, “Dishonesty in Science,” New York Review of Books, November 18, 2004; available at www.nybooks.com.
9. Mads Melbye et al., “Induced Abortion and the Risk of Breast Cancer,” New England Journal of Medicine 336, 2 (January 9, 1997): 81–85.
10. “Summary Report: Early Reproductive Events and Breast Cancer Workshop,” National Cancer Institute, March 2003; available at www.cancer.gov.
11. Richard N. Zare, “Science Is Not Just a Matter of Opinion,” San Francisco Chronicle, April 28, 2005.
12. Karl Popper, The Logic of Scientific Discovery (London: Routledge Classics, 2002), pp. 279–80
13. Rob Stein, “Internal Dissension Grows as CDC Faces Big Threats to Public Health,” Washington Post, March 6, 2005.
14. “The Foster Affair,” editorial, New York Times, July 13, 2004.
15. Robert Pear, “Inquiry Confirms Top Medicare Official Threat-ened Actuary over Cost of Drug Benefits,” New York Times, July 7, 2004.
16. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, “Transcript of the December 16, 2003, Meeting of the FDA Nonprescription Drugs Advisory Committee in Joint Ses-sion with the Advisory Committee for Reproductive Health Drugs,” December 16, 2003; available at www.fda.gov.
17. E. Pianin, “Proposed Mercury Rules Bear Industry Mark,” Washington Post, January 31, 2004.
18. D. Ferber, “HHS Intervenes in Choice of Study Section Members,” Science 298, 5597 (November 15, 2002): 1323.
19. A. Zitner, “Advisors Put Under a Microscope,” Los Angeles Times, December 23, 2002.
20. Franklin Foer, “Closing of the Presidential Mind,” The New Republic, July 5–12, 2004; available at www.tnr.com.
21. Ron Suskind, The Price of Loyalty: George W. Bush, the White House, and the Education of Paul O’Neill (New York: Simon and Schuster, 2004), p. 108.
22. Ron Suskind, “Without a Doubt,” New York Times Sunday Magazine, October 17, 2004.
23. N. Thompson, “Science Friction: The Growing—and Danger-ous—Divide between Scientists and the GOP,” Washington Monthly, July/August 2003.
24. Leslie Stahl, CBS News, March 21, 2004; transcript available at www.cbsnews.com.
25. Richard A. Clarke, Against All Enemies: Inside America’s War on Terror (New York: Free Press, 2004).
26. Fred Kaplan, “Richard Clarke KOs the Bushies,” Slate.com, March 24, 2004.
27. Jacob Weisberg, “The Misunderestimated Man,” Slate.com, May 7, 2004.
28. E. K. Ong and S. A. Glantz, “Constructing ‘Sound Science’ and ‘Good Epi-demiology’: Tobacco, Lawyers, and Public Relations Firms,” American Journal of Public Health 91, 11 (November 2001): 1749–57.
29. Union of Concerned Scientists and Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, “NOAA Fisheries Survey Summary,” June 2005; both available at www.ucsusa.org.
30. Carolyn Abraham, “No Faith in Science,” Toronto Globe and Mail, April 9, 2005.
31. Scott McClellan, responding to the House Minority report “Politics and Science,” August 19, 2003.
32. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Third Assessment Report, 2001, vols. 1–4; available at www.ipcc.ch.
33. IPCC, Third Assessment, 2001, vol. 2.
34. Naomi Oreskes, “The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change,” Science 306 (December 3, 2004): 1686.
35. Shankar Vedantam, “Kyoto Treaty Takes Effect Today: Impact on Global Warming May Be Largely Symbolic,” Washington Post, February 16, 2005.
36. White House, Office of the Press Secretary, “President Bush Discusses Global Climate Change,” June 11, 2001; available at www.whitehouse.gov.
37. Amy Goodman, “Bush’s Environment Chief: From the Oil Lobby to the White House to ExxonMobil,” Democracy Now, June 20, 2005; transcript available at www.democracynow.org.
38. Andrew Revkin, “In Editing Reports, Bush Official Minimized Greenhouse Gas Links,” New York Times, June 8, 2005.
39. Rick Piltz, resignation memo addressed to U.S. Climate Change Science Pro-gram agency principals, June 1, 2005; available on the website of Environmental Science and Technology journal at http://pubs.acs.org.
40. Andrew Revkin, “Former Bush Aide Who Edited Reports Is Hired by Exxon,” New York Times, June 15, 2005.
41. “Former Oil Lobbyist Employed by White House Leaves to Join ExxonMobil,” press announcement from the Natural Resources Defense Council, June 15, 2005; available at www.nrdc.org.
42. Julian Borger, “Ex-Oil Lobbyist Watered Down US Climate Research,” The Guardian (UK), June 9, 2005.
43. National Academy of Sciences, Commission on Geosciences, Environment and Resources, Climate Change Science: An Analysis of Some Key Questions, 2001; available at www.nap.edu/books.
44. P. Dobriansky, “Only New Technology Can Halt Climate Change,” Financial Times, December 1, 2003.
45. U.S. Department of State, “U.S. Climate Action Report,” May 2002; available at the website of the Environmental Protection Agency, www.epa.gov.
46. K. Q. Seelye, “President Distances Himself from Global Warming Report,” New York Times, June 5, 2002.
47. Jeremy Symons, “How Bush and Co. Obscure the Science,” Washington Post, July 12, 2003.
48. A. C. Revkin and K. Q. Seelye, “Report by EPA Leaves Out Data on Climate Change,” New York Times, June 19, 2003.
49. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Report on the Environment, June 23, 2003; available at www.epa.gov.
50. W. Soon and S. Baliunas, “Proxy Climatic and Environmental Changes of the Past 1000 Years,” Climate Research 23, 2 (2003): 89–110.
51. Michael Mann et al., “On Past Temperatures and Anomalous Late 20th-Century Warmth,” Eos 84, 27 (2003): 256–57.
52. Christine Todd Whitman, NOW with Bill Moyers, transcript, September 19, 2003.
53. Paul Harris, “Bush Covers Up Climate Research,” The Observer, September 21, 2003; available at http://observer.guardian.co.uk.
54. Russell E. Train, “When Politics Trumps Science” (letter to the editor), New York Times, June 21, 2003.
55. Chuck Schoffner, “NASA Expert Says Bush Stifles Evidence on Global Warming,” Associated Press, October 26, 2004.
56. Andrew Revkin, “Climate Expert Says NASA Tried to Silence Him,” New York Times, January 29, 2006.
57. “The Politics of Science,” editorial, Washington Post, February 9, 2006
58. Michael King, “NASA Joke Has Aggie Punch-line,” Austin Chronicle, February 17, 2006, available at www.austinchronicle.com.
59. Andrew Revkin, “NASA Chief Backs Agency Openness,” New York Times, February 4, 2006.
60. Juliet Eilperin, “Climate Researchers Feeling Heat from White House,” Wash-ington Post, April 6, 2006.
61. James O. Goldsborough, “The White House War against Science,” Copley News Service, October 26, 2004.
62. Chris C. Mooney, “Low-Ball Warming,” The American Prospect Online, June 20, 2005; available at www.prospect.org.
63. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency on Health Research Quality (AHRQ), National Healthcare Disparities Report, July 2003; available at www.ahrq.gov.
64. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Fact Sheet: Preventing Infant Mortality,” March 18, 2002; available at www.hhs.gov/news.
65. M. Gregg Bloche, “Health Care Disparities: Science, Politics, and Race,” New England Journal of Medicine 350, 15 (April 8, 2004): 1568–70.
66. U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Government Reform, Minority Staff, Special Investigations Division, Changes to the “National Healthcare Disparities Report”: A Case Study in Politics and Science, January 2004; available at www.reform.house.gov.
67. Institute of Medicine, Minorities More Likely to Receive Lower-Quality Health Care, Regardless of Income and Insurance Coverage, March 20, 2002; available at www.iom.edu.
68. Terry McAuliffe, Chair of the Democratic National Committee, “How Does the Bush Administration Solve Health Problems Faced?” America’s Intelligence Wire, January 15, 2004.
69. “Washington in Brief,” Washington Post, February 11, 2004.
70. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Preventing Lead Poisoning in Young Children: A Statement by the Centers for Disease Control, Report No. 99–2230 (Atlanta, GA: CDC, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1991).
71. Edward J. Markey, Turning Lead into Gold: How the Bush Ad-ministration Is Poisoning the Lead Advisory Committee at the CDC, October 8, 2002; available at www.house.gov.
72. William Banner Jr., June 13, 2002, in State of Rhode Island v. Lead Industries Association, C.A. No. 99–5526 (Superior Court of RI, April 2, 2001).
73. William Pierce, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Press Office, November 2003.
74. David Michaels et al., “Advice without Dissent,” Science 298, 5594 (October 25, 2002): 703.
75. P. Beeman, “Ag Scientists Feel the Heat,” Des Moines Register, December 1, 2002; available at www.dmregister.com.
76. J. Lee, “Neighbors of Vast Hog Farms Say Foul Air Endan-gers Their Health,” New York Times, May 11, 2003.
77. “Lists of Sensitive Issues for ARS Manuscript Review and Approval by National Program Staff—February 2002 (revised),” USDA, February 2002; available at www.ucsusa.org.
78. Jeffrey Sparshott, “U.S. Closes Border to Red Meat, Cattle after Report of Canadian Mad Cow Case,” Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News, May 21, 2003.
79. “Veneman Announces That Import Permit Applications for Certain Ruminant Products from Canada Will Be Accepted,” USDA Press Release, August 8, 2003; available at www.usda.gov.
80. Steve Mitchell, “Groups Question USDA’s Mad Cow Decision,” United Press International, August 12, 2003; available at wwworganicconsumers.org.
81. Rob Waters, “Drug Report Barred by FDA: Scientist Links Antidepressants to Suicide in Kids,” San Francisco Chronicle, February 1, 2004.
82. Dan Rather and Sharyl Attkisson, “FDA Altered Findings on Antidepressants,” America’s Intelligence Wire, March 30, 2004.
83. Gardiner Harris, “FDA Barred Expert’s Testimony,” New York Times, April 16, 2004.
84. “Antidepressant-Suicide Link to Be Probed,” Associated Press, April 19, 2004.
85. “Dirty Tricks?” New Scientist, December 4, 2004; available at www.new scientist.com.
86. “FDA Tried to Discredit Whistleblower over Drug Safety Claims,” Medical Letter on the CDC & FDA, December 19, 2004
87. Michael Scherer, “The Side Effects of Truth,” Mother Jones, May 2005.
88. Rick Weiss, “HHS Secretary Says Agencies Must Speak with One Voice: Some Fear New Controls on Flow of Information,” Washington Post, January 14, 2002.
89. Gardiner Harris, “Morning-after-Pill Ruling Defies Norm,” New York Times, May 8, 2004.
90. Judith Graham, “‘Morning After’ Pill Restricted by FDA,” Chicago Tribune, May 7, 2004
91. Vicki Kemper, “FDA: Doctor Must Still OK ‘Morning-After’ Pill,” Los Angeles Times, May 7, 2004.
92. Jeffrey M. Drazen et al., Correspondence: “The FDA, Politics, and Plan B,” New England Journal of Medicine 350, 15 (June 3, 2004): 1561–26.
93. K. Tumulty, “Jesus and the FDA,” Time, October 5, 2002
94. Chris Mooney, “Christian Science?” Mother Jones, September/October 2004.
95. Ayelish McGarvey, “Dr. Hager’s Family Values,” The Nation, May 30, 2005.
96. Marc Kaufman, “Memo May Have Swayed Plan B Ruling,” Washington Post, May 12, 2005.
97. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, “Transcript of the December 16, 2003 Meeting.”
98. “Facts You Should Know about Teenage Pregnancy,” March of Dimes, March 2002; available at www.marchofdimes.com.
99. Cicely Marston et al, “Impact on Contraceptive Practice of Making Emergency Hormonal Contraception Available over the Counter in Great Britain: Repeated Cross Sectional Surveys,” British Medical Journal, July 11, 2005; available at www.bmj.com.
100. Ellen Goodman, “Whose Common Ground?” Boston Globe, January 30, 2005.
101. Marc Kaufman, “FDA Rejects Over-the-Counter ‘Plan B, ’” Washington Post, May 7, 2004.
102. Lauran Neergaard, “FDA Rejects OTC Morning-After Pill Sales,” Associated Press May 6, 2004.
103. Steve Galson, FDA press conference, May 7, 2004.
104. “FDA Aide Quits in Protest of Morning-After Pill Decision,” Associated Press, August 31, 2005.
105. Rinker Buck, “Plan B Casualties,” Hartford Courant, October 2, 2005.
106. U.S. Government Accountability Office, “Food and Drug Administration: De-cision Process to Deny Initial Applications for Over-the-Counter Marketing of the Emergency Drug Plan B Was Unusual,” November 2005; available at www.gao.gov.
107. Alan Guttmacher Institute, Teen Sex and Pregnancy, August 1999
108. Content of Federally Funded Abstinence-Only Education Programs, citing the “Why kNOw” curriculum, 2004.
109. “Me, My World, My Future,” produced by Teen-aid, 1998.
110. “Me, My World, My Future” Teaching Manual.
111. Albert R. Hunt, “Abstinence-Only for Teenagers: A Pipe Dream,” Wall Street Journal, May 2, 2002.
112. A. DiCenso et al., “Interventions to Reduce Unintended Pregnancies among Adolescents: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials,” British Medical Journal 324 (June 15, 2002).
113. Elisa Cramer, “Pledge to Teach Facts, Not Ideology,” editorial, Palm Beach Post, July 8, 2005.
114. Welfare Reform: A Review of Abstinence Education and Transitional Medical Assistance, April 23, 2002: Hearing Before the 107th Congress, 2002, David W. Kaplan, M.D.; available at energy commerce.house.gov.
115. Advocates for Youth, “Will Ideology Trump Science in Deciding Public Health Policy?” ; fact sheet available at www.advocatesforyouth.org.
116. Government Performance and Results Act of 1993, Public Law No. 103–62, 107 Stat. 285; available at www.whitehouse.gov.