A strategy for the second breeding cycle of Larix x marschlinsii in Québec, Canada including experiments to guide interspecific tree breeding programme

Silvae Genetica

Volumn 57, Issue 4-5, 2008, Pages 282-291

  Perron, Martin ^a  

^a MINISTÈRE DES RESSOURCES NATURELLES ET DE LA FAUNE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Heterosis; Interspecies hybrid; Interspecific breeding strategy; Larix x eurolepis; Paternity analysis; Polymix crossing

Indexed keywords

EXPERIMENTS; FORESTRY; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; REFORESTATION; REVEGETATION; WELL TESTING;

HETEROSIS; INTERSPECIES HYBRID; INTERSPECIFIC BREEDING STRATEGY; LARIX X EUROLEPIS; PATERNITY ANALYSIS; POLYMIX CROSSING;

PLANTS (BOTANY); REFORESTATION;

BIOLOGICAL POPULATIONS; BIOLOGY; BREEDING; FORESTRY; HETEROSIS; PLANTS; REFORESTATION; SPECIES IDENTIFICATION; TREES;

LARIX; LARIX DECIDUA; LARIX KAEMPFERI; LARIX X MARSCHLINSII;

BREEDING PROGRAMMES; GENETIC GAIN; GENETIC IMPROVEMENTS; HETEROSIS; INTERSPECIES HYBRID; INTERSPECIFIC BREEDING STRATEGY; LARIX X EUROLEPIS; PATERNITY ANALYSIS; POLYMIX CROSSING; TREE BREEDING;

EID: 56749153530     PISSN: 00375349     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. ACHERÉ, V., P. FAIVRE RAMPANT, L. E. PÂQUES and D. PRAT (2004): Chloroplast and mitochondrial molecular tests identify European X Japanese larch hybrids. Theorical and Applied Genetics 108: 1643-1649.
2. ARNOLD, M. L. (1997): Natural hybridization and evolution. Oxford University Press, Inc., New York.
3. AUGER, D. L., A. D. GRAY, T. S. REAM, A. KATO, E. H. J. COE and J. A. BIRCHLER (2005): Nonadditive gene expression in diploid and triploid hybrids of maize. Genetics 169(1): 389-397.
4. BALTUNIS, B. S. and M. S. GREENWOOD (1996): Variation in lateral shoot elongation patterns and hybrid vigor in full-sib families and interspecific hybrids of larch. Tree Physiology 19: 131-136.
5. BALTUNIS, B. S., M. S. GREENWOOD and T. EYSTEINSSON (1998): Hybrid vigor in Larix: growth of intra- and interspecific hybrids of Larix decidua, L. laricina, and L. kaempferi after 5 years. Silvae Genetica 47: 288-293.
6. BASTIEN, J.-C. and R. KELLER (1980): Intérêts comparés du mélèze hybride (Larix x eurolepis Henry) avec les deux espèces parentes. Rev For Fr 32(6): 520-530.
7. BEAULIEU, J. (1996): Programme et stratégie d'amélioration génétique de l'épinette blanche au Québec. Ressources naturelles du Canada, Service canadien des forêts, Centre de foresterie des Laurentides. 0-662-81075-9, 26.pp.
8. BERGÈS, L. and R. CHEVALIER (2001): Les exigences écologiques des mélèzes. 52-59. pp. In: Les guides du sylviculteur: Le mélèze, edited by RIOU-NIVERT, P. Institut pour le développement forestier.
9. BONNET-MASIMBERT, M., P. BALDET, L. E. PÂQUES and G. PHILIPPE (1998): From flowering to artificial pollination in larch for breeding and seed orchard production. Forestry Chronicle 74(2): 195-202.
10. BRAWNER, J. T., M. J. DIETERS and D. G. NIKLES (2005): Mid-rotation performance of Pinus caribea var. hondurensis hybrids with both P. oocarpa and P. tecunumanii: hybrid superiority, stability of parental performance and potential for a multi-species synthetic breed. Forest Genetics 12(1): 1-13.
11. BRUCE, A. B. (1910): The mendelian theory of heredity and the augmentation of vigor. Science 32: 627-628.
12. COLAS, F., M. PERRON, D. TOUSIGNANT, C. PARENT, M. PELLETIER, and P. LEMAY (2008): A novel approach for the operational production of hybrid larch seeds under northern climatic conditions. The Forestry Chronicle 84(1): 95-104.
13. COTTERILL, P. P. and J. W. JAMES (1984): Number of offspring and plot sizes required for progeny testing. Silvae Genetica 33(6): 203-209.
14. DAVENPORT, C. B. (1908): Degeneration, albinism and inbreeding. Science 28: 454-455.
15. 1 hybrids of Pinus caribaea var. hondurensis with both Pinus oocarpa and Pinus tecunumanii. Can. J. For. Res. 27: 1024-1031.
16. EAST, E. M. (1936): Heterosis. Genetics 21: 375-397.
17. FERRAND, J. C. and J. C. BASTIEN (1985): Bilan à 26 ans d'une plantation comparative de mélèzes. Rev For Fr 37: 441-448.
18. FOWLER, D. P., J. D. SIMPSON, Y. S. PARK and M. H. SCHNEIDER (1988): Yield and wood properties of 25-year-old Japanese Larch of diffirent provenance in Eastern Canada. The Forestry Chronicle: 475-479.
19. GEA, L. D., R. MCCONNOCHIE and S. WYNYARD (2007): Parental reconstruction for breeding, deployment, and seed-orchard management of Eucalyptus nitens. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 37(1): 23-36.
20. GROS-LOUIS, M. C., J. BOUSQUET, L. E. PÂQUES and N. ISABEL(2005): Species-diagnotic markers in Larix spp. based on RAPDs and nuclear, cpDNA, and mtDNA gene sequences, and their phylogenetic implications. Tree Genetics & Genomes 1: 50-63.
21. HUA, J., Y. XING, W. WU, C. XU, X. SUN, Y. S. and Q. ZHANG (2003): Single-locus heterotic effects and dominance by dominance interactions can adequately explain the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100(5): 2574-2579.
22. JONES, D. F. (1917): Dominance of linked factors as means of accounting for heterosis. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 3: 310-312.
23. KEEBLE, F. and C. PELLEW (1910): The mode of inheritance of stature and of time of flowering in peas (Pisum sativum). Journal of Genetics 1: 47-56.
24. KERR, R. J., M. J. DIETERS and B. TIER (2004a): Simulation of the comparative gains from four different hybrid tree breeding strategies. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 34: 209-220.
25. KERR, R. J., M. J. DIETERS, B. TIER and H. S. DUNGEY (2004b): Simulation of hybrid forest tree breeding strategies. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 34: 195-208.
26. LACAZE, J.-F. and Y. BIROT (1974): Bilan d'une expérience comparative de provenances de mélèzes à l'âge de 13 ans. Annales des Sciences Forestières 31(3): 135-159.
27. LAMBETH, C., B.-C. LEE, D. O'MALLEY and N. WHEELER (2001): Polymix breeding with parental analysis of progeny: an alternative to full-sib breeding and testing. Theorical and Applied Genetics 103: 930-943.
28. LI, B. and R. WU (1996): Genetic causes of heterosis in juvenile aspen: a quantitative comparison across intra- and inter-specific hybrids. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 93: 380-391.
29. LI, B. and G. W. WYCKOFF (1994): Breeding strategies for Larix decidua, L. leptolepis and their hybrids in the United States. Forest Genetics 1(2): 65-72.
30. LINDGREN, D. and T. J. MULLIN (1997): Balancing gain and relatedness in selection. Silvae Genetica 46: 124-129.
31. LSTIBÚREK, M., T. J. MULLIN, D. LINDGREN and O. ROSVALL (2004): Open-nucleus breeding strategies compared with population-wide positive assertive mating II. Unequal distribution of testing effort. Theorical and Applied Genetics 109(6): 1169-1177.
32. NAMKOONG, G., R. D. BARNES and J. BURLEY (1980): Screening for yield in forest tree breeding. Commonwealth Forestry Review 59(1): 61-68.
33. NAMKOONG, G., H. C. KANG and J. S. BROUARD (1988): Tree breeding: principles and strategies. Springer-Verlag, New York.
34. OSTRY, M. E., P. M. PIJUT and D. D. SKILLING (1991): Screening Larch in vitro for resistance to Mycosphaerella laricina. Plant Disease 75(12): 1222-1224.
35. PÂQUES, L. (1992): Performance of vegetatively propagated Larix decidua, L. kaempferi and L. laricina hybrids. Annales des Sciences Forestières 49(1): 63-74.
36. PÂQUES, L. E. (1989): A critical review of larch hybridization and its incidence on breeding strategies. Annales des Sciences Forestières 46: 141-153.
37. PÂQUES, L. E. (2001): Genetic control of heartwood content in larch. Silvae Genetica 50(2): 69-75.
38. PÂQUES, L. E. (2004): Roles of European and Japanese larch in the genetic control of growth, architecture and wood quality traits in interspecific hybrids (Larix X eurolepis Henry). Annales des sciences forestières 61: 25-33.
39. PARK, Y. S. and D. P. FOWLER (1983): A provenance test of Japanese larch in eastern Canada, including comparative data on European larch and tamarack. Silvae Genetica 32(3-4): 96-101.
40. PHILIPPE, G. and P. BALDET (1992): Mechanized pollen harvesting with a view to hybrid larch seed production. Annales des Sciences Forestières 49: 297-303.
41. POTTS, B. M. and H. S. DUNGEY (2004): Interspecific hybridization of Eucalyptus: key issues for breeders and geneticists. New Forests 27: 115-138.
42. ROBBINS, K. (1985): Risks associated with growing non-native larches in Eastern North America. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry 2(4): 101-104.
43. ROSVALL, O. and E. W. ANDERSSON (1999): Group-merit selection compared to conventional restricted selection for trade-offs between genetic gain and diversity. Forest Genetics 6(1): 1-14.
44. ROSVALL, O., T. J. MULLIN and D. LINDGREN (2003): Controlling parent contributions during positive assortive mating and selection increases gain in long-term forest tree breeding. Forest Genetics 10(1): 35-53.
45. SHULL, G. H. (1908): The composition of a field of maize. American Breeding Association 4: 296-301.
46. STIPANICIC, A. (1984): Analyse de trois plantations expérimentales de mélèze (Larix sp.) âgées de cinq ans. In: Faculté de Foresterie et de Géodesie. Université Laval, p. 104.
47. STIPANICIC, A. (1999). Les mélèzes laricin et hybrides. In: L'amélioration génétique en foresterie: où en sommes-nous?, Rivière-du-Loup. pp. 77-85.
48. SWANSON-WAGNER, R. A., Y. JIA, R. DECOOK, L. A. BORSUK and D. NETTLETON (2006): All possible modes of gene action are observed in a global comparaison of gene expression in a maize F1 hybrid and its inbred parents. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103: 6805-6810.
49. SYED, N. H. and Z. J. CHEN (2005): Molecular marker genotypes, heterozygosity and genetic interactions explain heterosis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Heredity 94(3): 295-304.
50. TOUSIGNANT, D. and A. STIPANICIC (2000): Larix marschlinsii - Outline data sheet. 30 pp. In: Forestry Compendium Global Module. CABI Publishing.
51. TRÖBER, U. and W. Haasemann (2000): Pollination effects in a larch hybrid seed orchard. Forest Genetics 7(1): 77-82.
52. VIDAKOVIĆ, M. (1991): Conifers: morphology and variation. Graficki Zavod Hrvatske.
53. WEI, M. and J. H. J. VAN DER WERF (1994): Maximizing genetic response in crossbreds using both purebred and crossbred information. Animal Production 59: 401-413.
54. ZOBEL, B. and J. TALBERT (1991): Applied forest tree improvement. Waveland Press, Inc.