Three senses of "argument"

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4884 LNAI, Issue , 2007, Pages 146-161

  Wyner, Adam Z ^a   Bench Capon, Trevor J M ^a   Atkinson, Katie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Argument; Argumentation; Case; Debate

Indexed keywords

ONTOLOGY;

ARGUMENT; ARGUMENT SCHEMES; ARGUMENTATION; ARGUMENTATION FRAMEWORKS; CASE; CRITICAL QUESTIONS; DEBATE; IT IDENTIFIES;

FORMAL LOGIC;

EID: 56749104898     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-85569-9-10     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Reed, C., Rowe, G.: Araucaria: Software for argument analysis, diagramming and representation. International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools 13(4), 961-980 (2004)
2. Hunter, A.: Making argumentation more believable. In: [15], pp. 269-274
3. Hunter, A.: Towards higher impact argumentation. In [15], pp. 275-280
4. Caminada, M., Amgoud, L.: An axiomatic account of formal argumentation. In: Veloso, M.M., Kambhampati, S. (eds.) Proceedings of The Twentieth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, July 9-13, 2005, pp. 608-613. AAAI Press/The MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)
5. Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.C.: On the acceptability of arguments in bipolar argumentation frameworks. In: Godo, L. (ed.) ECSQARU 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3571, pp. 378-389. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
6. Walton, D.: Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Erlbaum, Mahwah (1996)
7. Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence 77, 321-358 (1995)
8. Toulmin, S.: The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1958)
9. Pollock, J.: Defensible reasoning with variable degrees of justification. Artificial Intelligence 133, 233-282 (2001)
10. Prakken, H.: Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1997)
11. Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C.: Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks. J. Autom. Reason 29(2), 125-169 (2002)
12. Bench-Capon, T.J.M.: Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks. J. Log. Comput. 13(3), 429-448 (2003)
13. Atkinson, K.: What Should We Do?: Computational Representation of Persuasive Argument in Practical Reasoning. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom (2005)
14. Ashley, K.: Modeling Legal Argument: Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals. Bradford Books/MIT Press, Cambridge (1990)
15. McGuinness, D.L., Ferguson, G.: Proceedings of the Nineteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Sixteenth Conference on Innovative Applica tions of Artificial Intelligence, July 25-29, 2004. AAAI Press / The MIT Press, San Jose (2004)