The evolution of recombination in changing environments

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 145-151

  Otto, Sarah P ^a   Michalakis, Yannis ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENVRIONMENTAL CHANGE; EVOLUTION; RECOMBINATION;

ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; EPISTASIS; EVOLUTION; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENOTYPE; HOST PARASITE INTERACTION; MUTATION RATE; REVIEW;

EID: 0031946857     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01260-3     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Feldman M.W. Selection for linkage modification. I. Random mating populations. Theor. Popul. Biol. 21:1972;430-439.
2. Charlesworth B. Recombination modification in a fluctuating environment. Genetics. 83:1976;181-195.
3. Barton N.H. A general model for the evolution of recombination. Genet. Res. 65:1995;123-144.
4. Feldman M.W., Otto S.P., Christiansen F.B. Population genetic perspectives on the evolution of recombination. Annu. Rev. Genet. 30:1997;261-295.
5. Barton N.H. Linkage and the limits to natural selection. Genetics. 140:1995;821-841.
6. Charlesworth B. Directional selection and the evolution of sex and recombination. Genet. Res. 61:1993;205-224.
7. Kondrashov A.S., Yampolsky L.Y. Evolution of amphimixis and recombination under fluctuating selection in one and many traits. Genet. Res. 68:1996;165-173.
8. Otto S.P., Barton N.H. The evolution of recombination: removing the limits to natural selection. Genetics. 147:1997;879-906.
9. Otto S.P., Feldman M.W. Deleterious mutations, variable epistatic interactions, and the evolution of recombination. Theor. Popul. Biol. 51:1997;134-147.
10. Peck J.R. A ruby in the rubish: beneficial mutations, deleterious mutations and the evolution of sex. Genetics. 137:1994;597-606.
11. Morgan, T.H. (1913) Heredity and Sex, Columbia University Press.
12. Fisher, R.A. (1930) The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, Oxford University Press.
13. Muller H.J. Some genetic aspects of sex. Am. Nat. 66:1932;118-138.
14. Kondrashov A.S. Classification of hypotheses on the advantage of amphimixis. J. Hered. 84:1993;372-387.
15. Korol, A.B., Preygel, I.A. and Preygel, S.I. (1994) Recombination Variability and Evolution: Algorithms of Estimation and Population-Genetic Models, Chapman & Hall.
16. Hurst L.D., Peck J.R. Recent advances in understanding of the evolution and maintenance of sex. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:1996;46-52.
17. Felsenstein, J. (1988) Sex and the evolution of recombination, in The Evolution of Sex (Michod, R.E. and Levin, B.R., eds), pp. 74-86, Sinauer Press.
18. Felsenstein J. The effect of linkage on directional selection. Genetics. 52:1965;349-363.
19. Maynard Smith J. Evolution in sexual and asexual populations. Am. Nat. 102:1968;469-473.
20. Eshel I., Feldman M.W. On the evolutionary effect of recombination. Theor. Popul. Biol. 1:1970;88-100.
21. Hill W.G., Robertson A. The effect of linkage on the limits to artificial selection. Genet. Res. Camb. 8:1966;269-294.
22. Korol A.B., Iliadi K.G. Recombination increase resulting from directional selection for geotaxis in Drosophila. Heredity. 72:1994;64-68.
23. Kondrashov A.S. Deleterious mutations and the evolution of sexual reproduction. Nature. 336:1988;435-441.
24. Maynard Smith, J. (1978) The Evolution of Sex, Cambridge University Press.
25. Sasaki A., Iwasa Y. Optimal recombination rate in fluctuating environments. Genetics. 115:1987;377-388.
26. Haldane J.B.S. Disease and evolution. La Ricerca Sci. 19:1949;68-76.
27. Hamilton W.D. Sex vs non-sex vs parasite. Oikos. 35:1980;282-290.
28. Hamilton W.D., Axelrod R., Tanese R. Sexual reproduction as an adaptation to resist parasites: a review. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87:1990;3566-3573.
29. Hamilton W.D. Haploid dynamic polymorphism in a host with matching parasites: effects of mutation/subdivision, linkage and patterns of selection. J. Hered. 84:1993;328-338.
30. Nee S. Antagonistic coevolution and the evolution of genotypic randomisation. J. Theor. Biol. 140:1989;499-518.
31. Bell G., Maynard Smith J. Short term selection for recombination among mutually antagonistic species. Nature. 328:1986;66-68.
32. Müller H.J. The relation of recombination to mutational advance. Mutat. Res. 1:1964;2-9.
33. Howard R.S., Lively C.M. Parasitism, mutation accumulation and the maintenance of sex. Nature. 367:1994;554-557.
34. Parker M.A. Pathogens and sex in plants. Evol. Ecol. 8:1994;560-584.
35. Clay K., Kover P.X. The Red Queen hypothesis and plant/pathogen interactions. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 34:1996;29-50.
36. Frank S.A. Recognition and polymorphism in host-parasite genetics. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B. 346:1994;283-293.
37. Parker M.A. The nature of plant-parasite specificity. Evol. Ecol. 10:1996;319-322.
38. Frank S.A. Problems inferring the specificity of plant-pathogen genetics. Evol. Ecol. 10:1996;323-325.
39. Ladle R.J., Johnstone R.A., Judson O.P. Coevolutionary dynamics of sex in a metapopulation: escaping the Red Queen. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B. 253:1993;155-160.
40. Gandon, S. et al. (1998) Differential adaptation in spatially heterogeneous environments and host-parasite coevolution, in Genetic Structure and Local Adaptation in Natural Insect Populations (Mopper, S. and Strauss, S., eds), pp. 325-342, Chapman & Hall.
41. Lively C.M., Howard R.S. Selection by parasites for clonal diversity and mixed mating. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B. 346:1994;271-281.
42. Gemmill A.W., Viney M.E., Read A.F. Host immune status determines sexuality in a parasitic nematode. Evolution. 51:1997;393-401.
43. Zeyl C., Bell G. The advantage of sex in evolving yeast populations. Nature. 388:1997;465-468.
44. Wolf H.G., Wöhrmann K., Tomuik J. Experimental evidence for the adaptive value of sexual reproduction. Genetica. 72:1987;151-159.
45. Kondrashov A.S., Yampolsky L.Y. High genetic variability under the balance between symmetric mutation and fluctuating stabilizing selection. Genet. Res. 68:1996;157-164.
46. Crow J. An advantage of sexual reproduction in a rapidly changing environment. J. Hered. 83:1992;169-173.
47. Shnol E.E., Kondrashov A.S. Effect of selection on the phenotypic variance. Genetics. 134:1993;995-996.
48. Flor H.H. The complementary genetics systems in flax and flax rust. Adv. Genet. 8:1956;29-54.