Parameters affecting the fundamental period of RC buildings with infill walls

Engineering Structures

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 93-102

  Kose, Mehmet Metin ^a  

^a KAHRAMANMARAS SUTCU IMAM UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Infill walls; RC buildings; Sensitivity analysis; The fundamental period

Indexed keywords

BUILDINGS; CODES (SYMBOLS); CONCRETE BUILDINGS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FORECASTING; LINEAR EQUATIONS; MODAL ANALYSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SHEAR WALLS; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

BUILDING HEIGHTS; BUILDING MODELS; CODE EQUATIONS; CURRENT CODES; FUNDAMENTAL PERIODS; INFILL WALLS; MODEL PARAMETERS; MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; NONLINEAR BEHAVIORS; RC BUILDINGS; RC FRAMES; THE FUNDAMENTAL PERIOD; TOTAL MASSES;

WALLS (STRUCTURAL PARTITIONS);

BUILDING; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; INFILL; NONLINEARITY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REINFORCED CONCRETE; RIGIDITY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; WALL;

EID: 56649115883     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.07.017     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Adham S., Avanessian V., Hart G., Anderson R., and Elmlinger J. Shear wall resistance of lightgage steel stud wall systems. Earthq Spectra 6 (1990) 1-14
2. Freeman S. Racking tests of high-rise building partitions. J Struct Div 103 (1977) 1673-1685
3. Rihal S. Research studies into seismic resistance and design of non-structural building components. Non-structural components: Design and detailing. SEAONC seminar proceedings, 1993
4. Villaverde R. Simple method to estimate the seismic nonlinear response of nonstructural; components in buildings. Eng Struct 28 (2006) 1450-1461
5. Cavaleri L., and Papia M. A new dynamic identification technique: Application to the evaluation of the equivalent strut for infilled frames. Eng Struct 25 7 (2003) 889-901
6. Vance VL. Effects of architectural walls on building response and performance. The John A. Blume Earthquake Eng. Center, Stanford University. 1995; 5: 18-24
7. Anil O., and Altin S. An experimental study on reinforced concrete partially infilled frames. Eng Struct 29 3 (2007) 449-460
8. Su R.K.L., Chandler A.M., Sheikh M.N., and Lam N.T.K. Influence of non-structural components on lateral stiffness of tall buildings. Struct Design Tall Special Buildings 14 2 (2005) 143-164
9. Amanat K.M., and Hoque E. A rationale for determining the natural period of RC building frames having infill. Eng Struct 28 (2006) 495-502
10. Crowley H, Pinho R. Simplified equations for estimating the period of vibration of existing buildings. In: Proceedings of the first european conference on earthquake engineering and seismology. 2006. Paper No. 1122
11. Chopra A.K., and Goel R.K. Period formulas for moment-resisting frame buildings. J Struct Eng 123 11 (1997) 533-536
12. Hong L., and Hwang W. Empirical formula for fundamental vibration periods of reinforced concrete buildings in Taiwan. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 29 (2000) 327-337
13. Stafford S.B. Lateral stiffness of infilled frames. J Struct Eng ASCE 88 (1962) 183-193
14. Stafford S.B. Behavior of square infilled frame. J Struct Div ASCE 92 92 (1992) 381-403
15. Al Chaar G., Issa M., and Sweeney S. Behavior of masonry- infilled nonductile reinforced concrete frames. J Struct Eng ASCE 128 (2002) 1055-1063
16. Asteris P.G. Lateral stiffness of brick masonry infilled plane frames. J Struct Eng ASCE 129 (2003) 1071-1079
17. Kose MM, Karslioglu O. Modelling the effect of infill walls on behavior of highrise RC buildings under earthquake loading. Tubitak project no. 105M022. Ankara. 2006
18. Integrated structural analysis & design software (2006), Computers and Structures Inc., Berkeley (CA)
19. Koken A. Theoretical and experimental investigation of the behavior of the multi-storey and multi-bay infilled steel frames under reversed cycling horizontal loading. Ph.D. thesis. Konya: Selcuk University; 2003
20. FEMA 306. Evaluation of earthquake damaged concrete and masonry wall building. Washington (DC): Federal Emergency Management Agency; 1998
21. Mainstone R.J. On the stiffness and strength of infilled frames. Proc Inst Civ Eng Sup (1971) 57-90
22. Mainstone RJ, Weeks GA. The influence of bounding frame on the racking stiffness and strength of brick walls. In: 2nd international brick masonry conference. 1970
23. International Conference of Building Officials. Uniform building code. California, Wilier. 1997
24. FEMA 450. NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures. Part 1: Provisions. Washington (DC): Federal Emergency Management Agency; 2003
25. Eurocode 8- Design of Structures for Earthquakes Resistance-Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings. Pr-EN 1998-1 Final Draft. Comité Européen de Normalisation. December 2003
26. National Research Council. The National Building Code (NBC). Canada; 1995
27. Kose M.M. Prediction of transfer length of prestressing strands using neural networks. ACI Struct J 105 (2007) 162-169
28. Maru S., and Nagpal A.K. Neural network for creep and shrinkage deflections in reinforced concrete frames. J Comput Civ Eng 18 (2004) 350-359
29. Dias W.P., and Pooliyadda S.P. Neural networks for predicting properties of concrete with admixtures. Constr Building Mater 15 (2001) 371-379
30. NeuroSolutions, NeuroSolutions for Excel, Custom Solution Wizard, Neuro Dimension, Inc., Gainesville, FL, URL: http://www.nd.com/, 2005
31. Demuth H, Beal M. Neural Network Toolbox for Use with MATLAB, The Mathworks Inc., 2001
32. Minton J.S., and Jesse C.A. Introduction to probability and statistics: Principles and applications for engineering and the computing sciences. 3rd ed. (1995), McGraw-Hill