Simple method to estimate the seismic nonlinear response of nonstructural components in buildings

Engineering Structures

Volumn 28, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 1209-1221

  Villaverde, Roberto ^a  

^a University of California at Irvine   (United States)

Author keywords

Approximate methods; Building attachments; Equipment design; Nonlinear analysis; Secondary systems; Seismic design

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; DUCTILITY; ESTIMATION; NONLINEAR SYSTEMS; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; SEISMOLOGY;

BUILDING ATTACHMENTS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; NONSTRUCTURAL COMPONENTS; SEISMIC RESPONSE;

BUILDING COMPONENTS;

APPROXIMATION THEORY; BUILDING COMPONENTS; DUCTILITY; ESTIMATION; NONLINEAR SYSTEMS; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; SEISMOLOGY;

BUILDING; NUMERICAL METHOD; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 33645898007     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.11.016     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Villaverde R. Seismic design of secondary structures: state of the art. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE 123 8 (1997) 1011-1019
2. Kawakatsu T, Kitada K, Takemory T, Kuwabara Y, Okiwara Y. Floor response spectra considering elasto-plastic behavior of nuclear facilities. In: Transactions 5th international conference on structural mechanics in reactor technology. Berlin, Fed. Rep. Germany; 1979. K9/4
3. Viti G., Olivieri M., and Travi S. Development of nonlinear floor response spectra. Nuclear Engineering and Design 64 1 (1981) 33-38
4. Lin J., and Mahin S.A. Seismic response of light subsystems on inelastic structures. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE 111 2 (1985) 400-417
5. Aziz T, Ghobarah A. Equipment design: future directions. In: Proceedings 9th world conference on earthquake engineering, vol. 6. Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan; 1988. p. 261-6
6. Segal D, Hall WJ. Experimental seismic investigation of appendages in structures. SRS report No. 545. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; 1989
7. Toro GR, McGuire RK, Cornell CA, Sewell RT. Linear and nonlinear response of structures and equipment to California and Eastern United States earthquakes. EPRI report NP-5566. Palo Alto, Calif.: Electric Power Research Institute; 1989
8. Sewell RT, Cornell CA, Toro GR, McGuire RK, Kassawara RP, Singh A. Factors influencing equipment response in linear and nonlinear structures. In: Transactions 9th international conference on structural mechanics in reactor technology. Lausanne, Switzerland; 1989. K2: p. 849-56
9. Igusa T. Response characteristics of inelastic 2-dof primary-secondary system. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE 116 5 (1990) 1160-1174
10. Schroeder ME, Bachman RE. Analytical studies in support of the 1994 NEHRP provisions for nonstructural components. In: Proceedings 5th US national conference on earthquake engineering, vol. 4. Chicago, Ill.; 1994. p. 755-64
11. Singh MP, Chang TS, Suarez LE. Floor response spectrum amplification due to yielding of supporting structure. In: Proceedings 11th world conference on earthquake engineering. Acapulco, Mexico; 1996. Paper No. 1444
12. Adam C., and Fotiu P.A. Dynamic analysis of inelastic primary-secondary systems. Engineering Structures 22 (2000) 58-71
13. Adam C. Dynamics of elastic-plastic shear frames with secondary structures: shake table and numerical studies. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 30 2 (2001) 257-277
14. Villaverde R. Approximate formulas to calculate the seismic response of light attachments to buildings. Nuclear Engineering and Design 128 3 (1991) 349-368
15. Villaverde R, Newmark NM. Seismic response of light attachment to buildings. SRS report No. 469. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; 1980
16. Chopra AK. Dynamics of Structures: A Primer, Monograph MNO-2. Oakland, Calif.: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute; 1982
17. Newmark NM, Hall WJ. Earthquake spectra and design. Oakland, Calif.: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute; 1982
18. Miranda E. Site-dependent strength-reduction factors. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE 119 12 (1993) 3503-3519
19. Villaverde R. Explanation for the numerous upper floor collapses during the 1985 Mexico City earthquake. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 20 3 (1991) 223-241
20. Shakal AF, Huang MJ. Recorded ground and structure motions. Chapter 2, Northridge earthquake reconnaissance report, vol. 1, Earthquake Spectra, Supplement C to vol. 11. 1995
21. Hall JF (technical editor). Preliminary reconnaissance report, Northridge Earthquake, January 17, 1994. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute; 1994