Copyright notices in traditional and new media journals: Lies, damned lies, and copyright notices

Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 101-126

  Poor, Nathaniel ^a,b  

^a Apt 1F ^*

^b Apt 1F

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 56649087922     PISSN: 10836101     EISSN: 10836101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.01433.x     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Abbate, J 1999). Inventing the Internet. Cambridge : MIT Press.
2. Association of Research Libraries n.d American Geophysical Union v. Texaco Inc. Retrieved June 11, 2008, from http://www.arl.org/pp/ppcopyright/ copyresources/texaco.shtml
3. Bangeman, E 2007, August 1). FTC complaint flags NFL, MLB, studios for overstating copyright claims. Ars Technica. Retrieved October 3, 2007, from http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070801-ftc-complaint-flags-nfl-mlb- studios-for-overstating-copyright-claims.html
4. Banzhaf, J 1967). Computers and the copyright law: A commentary. Communications of the ACM, 10 (1 61.
5. Bartow, A 1998). Educational fair use in copyright: Reclaiming the right to photocopy freely. University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 60. Retrieved June 26, 2008, from http://ssrn.com/paper=506983
6. Benkler, Y 1999). Free as the air to common use: First amendment constraints on enclosure of the public domain. New York University Law Review, 74, 354 446.
7. Benkler, Y 2003). Through the looking glass: Alice and the constitutional foundations of the public domain. Law and Contemporary Problems, 66 (1&2 173 224.
8. Boyce, B 1996). Copyright could be wrong: Copyright law on scholarly journals needs revision. American Libraries, 27 (2 27 28.
9. Boyd, d 2008). Open-access is the future: Boycott locked-down academic journals. Retrieved August 1, 2008, from http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/ archives/2008/02/06/openaccess_is_t.html
10. Breyer, S. J 1970). The uneasy case for copyright: A study of copyright in books, photocopies, and computer programs. Harvard Law Review, 84 (2 281 351.
11. Burk, D. L 2001). Copyrightable functions and patentable speech. Communications of the ACM, 44 (2 69 75.
12. Cornell University Law School, Legal Information Institute n.d American Geophysical Union v. Texaco, Inc, 60 F.3d 913 (2nd Cir. 1994). Retrieved June 11, 2008, from http://www.law.cornell.edu/copyright/cases/60_F3d_913.htm
13. Creative Commons 2007). Legal concepts. Retrieved October 3, 2007, from http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Legal_Concepts
14. Crews, K. D 1993). Copyright, fair use, and the challenge for universities: Promoting the progress of higher education. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
15. Day, C 1995). Copyright, pricing and market power: The great journals debate. Logos, 6 (1 39 42.
16. Doctorow, C 2004, June). Microsoft Research DRM talk. Paper presented at the meeting of the Microsoft Research Group, Redmond, WA. Retrieved October 3, 2007, from http://craphound.com/msftdrm.txt
17. Frazier, K 1999). What's wrong with fair-use guidelines for the academic community? Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50 (14 1320 1323.
18. Gadd, E., Oppenheim, C. Probets, S 2003). RoMEO studies 4: An analysis of journal publishers' copyright agreements. Learned Publishing, 16 (4 293 308.
19. Guess, A 2008). A press revolt against e-packet practices. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved June 11, 2008, from http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2008/04/17/ gsu
20. Hafner, K 2008, April 16). Publishers sue Georgia State on digital reading matter. The New York Times. Retrieved June 11, 2008, from http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/16/technology/16school.html
21. Hansell, S 2008, June 20). The A.P. asserts tough (and still secret) view of copyright on blogs. The New York Times. Retrieved June 22, 2008, from http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/06/20/the-ap-asserts-tough-and-still-secret- view-of-copyright-on-blogs/
22. th Annual Meeting of the Conference on College Composition and Communication, Chicago, IL. Retrieved October 3, 2007, from http://www.eric.ed.gov:80/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/ recordDetails/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0= ED430225&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=eric_accno&accno=ED430225
23. International Journal of Communication 2007a). Editorial policy: Open access policy. Retrieved October 3, 2007, from http://ijoc.org/ojs/index.php/ ijoc/about/editorialPolicies#openAccessPolicy
24. International Journal of Communication 2007b). Submissions: Copyright notice. Retrieved October 3, 2007, from http://ijoc.org/ojs/index.php/ijoc/ about/submissions#copyrightNotice
25. Jackson, M 2002). From private to public: Reexamining the technological basis for copyright. Journal of Communication, 52 (2 416 433.
26. Kasunic, R 1993). Fair use and the educator's right to photocopy copyrighted material for classroom use. The Journal of College and University Law, 19 (3 271 293.
27. Kim, M 2007). The Creative Commons and copyright protection in the digital era: Uses of Creative Commons licenses. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13 (1 187 209.
28. Lessig, L 2004). Free culture. New York : Penguin.
29. Liebowitz, S. J 1985). Copying and indirect appropriability: Photocopying of journals. Journal of Political Economy, 93 (5 945 957.
30. Litman, J 1999). Electronic commerce and free speech. Ethics and Information Technology, 1 (3 213 225.
31. Litman, J 2001). Digital copyright. Amherst, NY : Prometheus.
32. Litman, J 2006). The economics of open access law publishing. Lewis & Clark Law Review, 10 (4 779 796.
33. Mazzone, J 2006). Copyfraud. New York University Law Review, 81 (3 1026 1100. Retrieved August 1, 2008, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? abstract_id=787244
34. National Institute of Health 2004). Finding aid to Williams & Wilkins Co. v. The United States. Retrieved June 11, 2008, from http://www.nlm.nih.gov/ hmd/manuscripts/ead/williams.html
35. Pfaffenberger, B 2001). Why open content matters. Knowledge, Technology, and Policy, 14 (1 93 102.
36. Rajan, M 2002). Moral rights in the digital age: New possibilities for the democratization of culture. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 16 (2 187 197.
37. Science Commons. (n.d.). Open access law program. Retrieved October 3, 2007, from http://sciencecommons.org/projects/publishing/oalaw/
38. Seltzer, W 2007). Wendy's blog. Retrieved October 3, 2007, from http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/?s=nfl
39. Silberberg, C 2001). Preserving educational fair use in the twenty-first century. University of Southern California Law Review, 74, 617 655.
40. Spoo, R., Orlans, H. Cornett, M 2002). Current copyright law and fair use: The Council of Editors of Learned Journals, keynote address, MLA convention 2000. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 33 (3 125 147.
41. Stanford University Libraries. (n.d.a). Basic Books, Inc. v. Kinko's Graphics Corporation, 758 F. Supp. 1522 (1991). Retrieved June 11, 2008, from http://fairuse.stanford.edu/primary_materials/cases/c758FSupp1522.html
42. Stanford University Libraries n.d.b). Williams & Wilkins Co. v. The United States. Retrieved June 11, 2008, from http://fairuse.stanford.edu/ primary_materials/cases/c487F2d1345.html
43. Stewart, C 2008). What does the lawsuit against Georgia State mean? Northwestern University Library Blog. Retrieved June 11, 2008, from http://www.library.northwestern.edu/blog/nulcopyright/2008/04/ what_does_the_lawsuit_against.html
44. Suber, P 2007). Open access overview. Retrieved June 15, 2008, from http://www.earlham.edu/∼peters/fos/overview.htm
45. Taylor & Francis. (n.d.). About us - Our history. Retrieved June 15, 2008, from http://www.taylorandfrancisgroup.com/about/history.asp
46. th edition website: Basic Books v. Kinko's. Retrieved June 11, 2008, from http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/cas/comm/free_speech/basicbooks.html
47. United Nations. (n.d.). Universal declaration of human rights. Retrieved October 3, 2007 http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html
48. University of Texas System, Office of General Counsel. (n.d.). Professional fair use after Texaco. Retrieved June 11, 2008, from http://www.utsystem.edu/OGC/intellectualProperty/tex2.htm
49. US Copyright Office 1992). Circular 1 - copyright basics: International copyright protection. Retrieved October 12, 2007 http://palimpsest.stanford.edu/ bytopic/intprop/circ1.html
50. Vaidhyanathan, S 2001). Copyrights and copywrongs. New York : New York University Press.
51. Vaidhyanathan, S 2002). Copyright as cudgel. Chronicle of Higher Education, 48 (47). Retrieved October 12, 2007, from http://chronicle.com/free/ v48/i47/47b00701.htm
52. Ward, P. L 2002). Copyright: The ideal framework for editors of scholarly journals. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 33 (4). Retrieved October 3, 2007, from http://alia.org.au/publishing/aarl/33.4/full.text/layzell. ward.html
53. Wise, D 1999). Changes in ACM's revised copyright policy. Communications of the ACM, 42 (6 116 119.