The creative commons and copyright protection in the digital era: Uses of creative commons licenses

Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 187-209

  Kim, Minjeong ^a  

^a HAWAII PACIFIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER NETWORKS;

COPYRIGHT HOLDERS; COPYRIGHT LAW; COPYRIGHT PROTECTIONS; CREATIVE COMMONS; DIGITAL ERA; DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES; ENFORCEMENT MECHANISMS; MIXED METHOD; PUBLIC INTEREST; VIABLE SOLUTIONS;

COPYRIGHTS;

EID: 37249025758     PISSN: 10836101     EISSN: 10836101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00392.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Benkler, Y 2000). From consumers to users: Shifting the deeper structures of regulation towards sustainable commons and user access. Federal Communication Law Journal, 52, 561 579.
2. Benkler, Y 2001). Property, commons, and the First Amendment: Towards a core common infrastructure. White Paper for the First Amendment Program, Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law. Retrieved November 10, 2004 from http://www.benkler.org/WhitePaper.pdf
3. Boyle, J 2004). A manifesto on WIPO and the future of intellectual property. Duke Law & Technology Review, 2004 (0009). Retrieved October 20, 2004 from http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dltr/articles/2004dltr0009.html
4. Chmielewski, D. C 2004, November 8). Rip. sample. mash. share: The Wired CD's Creative Commons license lets listeners sample and swap songs online - legally. Mercury News. Retrieved November 10, 2004 from http://www.mercurynews. com/mld/mercurynews/business/10126944.htm?1c
5. Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 411(a) (2000).
6. Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 412 (2000).
7. Gasaway, L. N 2003). Copyright ownership & the impact on academic libraries. DePaul-LCA Journal of Art and Entertainment Law, 13, 277 311.
8. nd ed Stanford, CA : Stanford Law and Politics/Stanford University Press.
9. th ed New York : Foundation Press.
10. Jones, M 2004). Eldred v. Ashcroft: The constitutionality of the copyright term extension act. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 19, 85 106.
11. Kim, M 2005). An Analysis of the Creative Commons as a Solution for Copyright Protection in the Digital Era. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
12. Kranich, N 2004). The Information Commons: A Public Policy Report. The Free Expression Policy Project. Brennan Center for Justice at NYC School of Law.
13. Lessig, L 2004a). Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity. New York : Penguin Press.
14. Lessig, L 2004b). The Creative Commons. Montana Law Review, 65, 1 13.
15. Linksvayer, M 2005, March 7). CC search index breakdown. Creative Commons blog. Retrieved March 10, 2005 from http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/ 5311
16. Merges, R. P 2004). A new dynamism in the public domain. University of Chicago Law Review, 7, 181 203.
17. Movement seeks copyright alternatives 2004, October 10). Associated Press. Retrieved October 15, 2004 from http://www.forbes.com/business/feeds/ap/ 2004/10/10/ap1584258.html
18. O'Hara, R 2003). You say you want a revolution: Music & technology - evolution or destruction? Gonzaga Law Review, 39, 247 294.
19. Reichman, J. H. Uhlir, P. F 2003). The public domain: A contractually reconstructed research commons for scientific data in a highly protectionist intellectual property environment. Law and Contemporary Problems, 66, 315 462.
20. Rohter, L 2006, June 26). Some rights reserved: Advancing flexible copyrights. New York Times, p. E1.
21. Samuelson, P. (n.d Tightening the copyright noose: Why you should be worried about the white paper on intellectual property rights and the national information infrastructure. Retrieved October 20, 2004 from http://www.eff.org/ IP/?f=tightening_copyright_noose.article.txt
22. "Some rights reserved:" Building a layer of reasonable copyright n.d Retrieved July 2, 2004 from http://creativecommons.org/about/ history
23. Stoeltje, G 2004). Light in custody: Documentary films, the TEACH Act, and the DMCA. Santa Clara Computer and High Technology Law Journal, 20, 1075 1111.
24. Wagner, R. P 2003). Information wants to be free: Intellectual property and the mythologies of control. The Columbia Law Review, 103, 995 1034.