Influence of the polyacyl chloride structure on the reverse osmosis performance, surface properties and chlorine stability of the thin-film composite polyamide membranes

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 326, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 205-214

  Liu, Meihong ^a   Wu, Dihua ^a   Yu, Sanchuan ^a   Gao, Congjie ^b  

^a ZHEJIANG SCI TECH UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Chongqing Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources   (China)

Author keywords

Chlorine stability; Polyacyl chloride; Reverse osmosis; Surface property; Thin film composite membrane

Indexed keywords

ABS RESINS; CAPILLARITY; CHLORINE; COMPOSITE FILMS; COMPOSITE MEMBRANES; CONTACT ANGLE; LIQUIDS; MEMBRANES; MONOMERS; OSMOSIS; OSMOSIS MEMBRANES; POLYAMIDES; POLYMER MATRIX COMPOSITES; POLYMERS; REVERSE OSMOSIS; SOLUTIONS; STRUCTURAL PROPERTIES; SURFACE ROUGHNESS; THICK FILMS; THIN FILM DEVICES; TRACE ANALYSIS; ZETA POTENTIAL;

ABSOLUTE VALUES; AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS; BEFORE AND AFTER; FILM COMPOSITES; FILM PROPERTIES; HIGH PH; INTERFACIAL POLYMERIZATIONS; ISOCYANATO GROUPS; ISOPHTHALOYL CHLORIDES; MEMBRANE PERFORMANCES; PERMEATION EXPERIMENTS; POLYACYL CHLORIDE; POLYAMIDE MEMBRANES; REVERSE OSMOSIS PERFORMANCES; SALT REJECTION RATES; SEPARATION PERFORMANCES; STREAMING POTENTIAL MEASUREMENTS; STRUCTURAL DIFFERENCES; SURFACE SMOOTHNESSES; THIN-FILM COMPOSITE MEMBRANE; TRIMESOYL CHLORIDES; WATER PERMEABILITIES;

SURFACE PROPERTIES;

CHLORIDE; CHLORINE; POLYACYL CHLORIDE; POLYAMIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FILM; HYDROPHILICITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVERSE OSMOSIS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE CHARGE; SURFACE PROPERTY; WATER ABSORPTION; WATER PERMEABILITY;

EID: 56649086550     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.10.004     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Cadotte J.E. Evolution of composite reverse osmosis membranes. In: LIoyd D.R. (Ed). Material Science of Synthetic Membranes (1985), American Chemical Society, Washington, DC 273-294
2. Baker R.W. Membrane Technology and Applications. 2nd ed. (2004), John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester
3. Arthur S.D. Structure-property relationship in thin film composite reverse osmosis membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 46 (1989) 243-260
4. Masahiko H., Hiroki I., and Yoshiyasu K. Effect of skin layer surface structures on the flux behavior of RO membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 121 2 (1996) 209-215
5. Hirose M., Minamizaki Y., and Kamiyama Y. The relationship between polymer molecular structure of RO membrane skin layer and their RO performances. J. Membr. Sci. 123 (1997) 151-156
6. Kim C.K., Kim J.H., Roh I.J., and Kim J.J. The changes of membrane performance with polyamide molecular structure in the reverse osmosis process. J. Membr. Sci. 165 (2000) 189-199
7. Ghosh A.K., Jeong B.-H., Huang X., and Hoek E.M.V. Impacts of reaction and curing conditions on polyamide composite reverse osmosis membrane properties. J. Membr. Sci. 311 (2008) 34-45
8. Hamza A., Chowdhury G., Matsuura T., and Sourirajan S. Study of reverse osmosis separation and permeation rate for sulfonated poly(2,6-dimethyl 1,4-phenylene oxide) membranes of different ion exchange capacities. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 58 (1995) 613
9. Childress A.E., and Elimelech M. Effect of solution chemistry on the surface charge of polymeric reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 119 (1996) 253-268
10. Elimelech M., Zhu X., Childress A.E., and Hong S. Role of membrane surface morphology in colloidal fouling of cellulose acetate and composite aromatic polyamide reverse osmosis membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 127 (1997) 101
11. Vrijenhoek E.M., Hong S., and Elimelech M. Influence of membrane surface properties on initial rate of colloidal fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 188 (2001) 115
12. Petersen R.J. Composite reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 83 (1993) 81-150
13. Li-Fen Liu, San-Chuan Yu, Yong Zhou, and Cong-Jie Gao. Study on a novel polyamide-urea reverse osmosis composite membrane (ICIC-MPD). I. Preparation and characterization of ICIC-MPD membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 281 (2006) 88-94
14. Yong Zhou, Sanchuan Yu, Meihong Liu, and Congjie Gao. Preparation and characterization of polyamide-urethane thin-film composite membranes. Desalination 180 (2005) 189-196
15. Wenzel R.N. Surf. Rough. Contact Angle 53 (1949) 1466
16. van Wagenen R.A., and Andrade J.D. Flat plate streaming potential investigations: hydrodynamics and electro-kinetic equivalency. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 76 (1980) 305-314
17. J.M.M. Peeters, Characterization of nanofiltration membranes, Doctoral thesis, University of Twente, 1997.
18. S.D. Arthur, D. Wilmington, Multilayer reverse osmosis membrane of polyamide-urea, US Patent No. 5,019,264 (1991).
19. S.D. Arthur, D. Wilmington, Reverse osmosis membranes of polyamide-urethane, US Patent No. 5,085,777 (1991).
20. Morgan P.W. Interfacial polymerization without stirring. Condensation Polymers by Interfacial and Solution Methods (1965), Interscience Publishers, New York, NY pp. 19-64
21. Spiegler K.S., and Kedem O. Thermodynamics of hyperfiltration (reverse osmosis): criteria for efficient membranes. Desalination 1 (1966) 311-326
22. Kwon Y.N., and Leckio J.O. Hypochlorite degradation of crosslinked polyamide membranes. II. Changes in hydrogen bonding behavior and performance. J. Membr. Sci. 282 (2006) 456-464
23. Koo J.Y., Petersen R.J., and Cadotte J.E. ESCA characterization of chlorine damaged polyamide reverse osmosis membrane. ACS Polym. Preprints 27 2 (1986) 391-392
24. Glater J., Hong S., and Elimelech M. The search for a chorine-resistant reverse osmosis membrane. Desalination 95 (1994) 325-345
25. Soice N.P., Maladono A.C., Takigawa D.Y., Norman A.D., Krantz W.B., Alan, and Greenberg R. Oxidative degradation of polyamide reverse osmosis membranes of molecular model compounds and selected membranes. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 90 (2003) 1173-1184
26. Soice N.P., Greenberg A.R., Krantz W.B., and Norman A.D. Studies of oxidative degradation in polyamide RO membrane barrier layers using pendant drop mechanical analysis. J. Membr. Sci. 243 (2004) 345-355