Initial reliability of the Standardized Orthopedic Assessment Tool (SOAT)

Journal of Athletic Training

Volumn 43, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 483-488

  Lafave, Mark R ^a   Katz, Larry ^b   Donnon, Tyrone ^b   Butterwick, Dale J ^b  

^a MOUNT ROYAL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Education; Measurement and evaluation; Musculoskeletal assessment; Objective structured clinical examinations; Validity

Indexed keywords

ANKLE INJURY; ARTICLE; CANADA; COLLEGE STUDENT; CRONBACH ALPHA COEFFICIENT; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; HUMAN; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; KNEE INJURY; NORMAL HUMAN; SHOULDER INJURY; STANDARDIZED ORTHOPEDIC ASSESSMENT TOOL;

EID: 56549127890     PISSN: 10626050     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-43.5.483     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Denegar CR, Fraser M. How useful are physical examination procedures? Understanding and applying likelihood ratios. J Athl Train. 2006;41(2):201-206.
2. Fritz JM, Wainner RS. Examining diagnostic tests: an evidence-based perspective. Phys Ther. 2001;81(9):1546-1564.
3. Lawry GV 2nd, Schuldt SS, Kreiter CD, Denson P, Albanese MA. Teaching a screening musculoskeletal examination: a randomized, control trial of different instructional methods. Acad Med. 1999;74(2):199-201.
4. Lafave M, Katz L, Butterwick D. Development of a content-valid standardized orthopedic assessment tool (SOAT) [published online ahead of print January 3, 2007]. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. doi: 10.1007/s10459-006-9050-2.
5. Cyriax JH. Textbook of Orthopaedic Medicine. 8th ed. London, England: Bailliere Tindall; 1982. Diagnosis of Soft Tissue Lesions; vol 1.
6. Magee D. Orthopedic Physical Assessment. 4th ed. Toronto, ON: WB Saunders; 2002.
7. Butterwick DJ, Paskevich DM, Lagumen NG, Vallevand AL, Lafave MR. The development of content-valid technical skill assessment instruments for athletic taping skills. J Allied Health. 2006;35(3):147-155.
8. Violato C, Marini A, McDougall D. Assessment of Classroom Learning. Calgary, AB: Detselig Enterprises Ltd; 1998.
9. Haladyna TM. A research agenda for licensing and certification testing validation studies. Eval Health Prof. 1994;17(2):242-256.
10. Cavanaugh SH. Response to a legal challenge: five steps to defensible credentialing examinations. Eval Health Prof. 1991;14(1):13-40.
11. Biggs J. Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. J Higher Educ. 1996;32(3):347-364.
12. Hopkins KD. Educational and Psychological Measurement and Evaluation. 8th ed. Toronto, ON: Allyn & Bacon; 1998.
13. Hodges B. Validity and the OSCE. Med Teach. 2003;25(3):250-254.
14. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2003.
15. Shultz SJ, Houglum PA, Perrin DH. Examination of Musculosketetal Injuries. 2nd ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2005.
16. Caine DJ, Caine CG, Lindner KJ. Epidemiology of Sports Injuries. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1996.
17. Harden RM, Stevenson M, Downie WW, Wilson GM. Assessment of clinical competence using objective structured examination. Br Med J. 1975;1(5955):447-451.
18. Harden RM, Gleeson FA. Assessment of clinical competence using an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Med Educ. 1979;13(1):41-54.
19. Norman GR, Van der Vleuten CP, De Graaff E. Pitfalls in the pursuit of objectivity: issues of validity, efficiency and acceptability. Med Educ. 1991;25(2):119-126.
20. Van der Vleuten CP, Norman G, De Graaff E. Pitfalls in the pursuit of objectivity: issues of reliability. Med Educ. 1991;25(2):110-118.
21. Armstrong GD. The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of interrater reliability of subjective judgments. Nurs Res. 1981;30(5): 314-320.
22. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86(2):420-428.
23. Brennan RL. Generalizability theory. Educ Measure. 2003;40(1):105-107.
24. Brennan RL. Performance assessment from the perspective of generalizability theory. Appl Psychol Measure. 2000;24(4):339-353.
25. Van Luijk S, Van der Vleuten C. A comparison of checklists and rating scales in performance based testing. In: Hart IR, Harden RM, Des Marchais J, eds. Current Developments in Assessing Clinical Competence. Montreal, QC: Can-Heal; 1992:357-382.
26. Regehr G, MacRae H, Reznick RK, Szalay D. Comparing the psychometric properties of checklists and global rating scales for assessing performance on an OSCE-format examination. Acad Med. 1998;73(9):993-997.
27. Hodges B, Regehr G, McNaughton N, Tiberius R, Hanson M. OSCE checklists do not capture increasing levels of expertise. Acad Med. 1999;74(10):1129-1134.
28. Solomon DH, Simel DL, Bates DW, Katz JN, Schaffer JL. The rational clinical examination: does this patient have a torn meniscus or ligament of the knee? Value of the physical examination. JAMA. 2001;286(13):1610-1620.
29. Benjaminse A, Gokeler A, van der Schans CP. Clinical diagnosis of an anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36(5):267-288.
30. Cohen R, Reznick RK, Taylor BR, Provan J, Rothman A. Reliability and validity of the objective structured clinical examination in assessing surgical residents. Am J Surg. 1990;160(3):302-305.
31. Winckel CP, Reznick RK, Cohen R, Taylor B. Reliability and construct validity of a structured technical skills assessment form. Am J Surg. 1994;167(4):423-427.
32. Messick S. Standards of validity and the validity of standards in performance assessment. Educ Measure. 1995;14(4):5.