Implicit preconditioned WENO scheme for steady viscous flow computation

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 228, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 420-438

  Huang, Juan Chen ^a   Lin, Herng ^b   Yang, Jaw Yen ^c  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN OCEAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b CHUNG SHAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

All speeds; Hypersonic flow; Low Mach number flow; Preconditioned Navier Stokes equations; Spalart Allmaras turbulence model; Transonic flows; WENO schemes

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMICS; HYPERSONIC FLOW; MACH NUMBER; TRANSONIC FLOW; TURBULENCE MODELS; VISCOUS FLOW;

ALL SPEED; ESSENTIALLY NON-OSCILLATORY SCHEMES; FIRST ORDER; HIGH-ORDER; LOW-MACH-NUMBER FLOW; NAVIER-STOKES EQUATION; PRECONDITIONED NAVI-STOKE EQUATION; SPALART-ALLMARAS TURBULENCE MODEL; WEIGHTED ESSENTIALLY NONOSCILLATORY; WEIGHTED ESSENTIALLY NONOSCILLATORY SCHEME;

NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS;

EID: 56549098793     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: 10902716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2008.09.017     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Shuen J.S., Choi Y., and Chen K.H. A coupled implicit method for chemical non-equilibrium flows at all speeds. J. Comp. Phys. 106 (1994) 200-212
2. E. Turkel, Robust Low Speed Preconditioning for Viscous High Lift Flows, AIAA Paper 2002-0962.
3. L.D. Dailey, R.H. Pletcher, Evaluation of Multigrid Acceleration for Preconditioned Time-Accurate Navier-Stokes Algorithms, AIAA Paper 95-1668-CP.
4. Weiss J.M., and Smith W.A. Preconditioning applied to variable and constant density flows. AIAA J. 33 11 (1995) 2050-2057
5. D. Jespersen, T.H. Pulliam, P. Buning, Recent Enhancements to OVERFLOW, AIAA Paper 97-0644.
6. S.A. Pandya, S. Venkateswaran, T.H. Pulliam, Implementation of Preconditioned Dual-time Procedures in OVERFLOW, AIAA Paper 2003-0072.
7. Edwards J.R., and Roy C.J. Preconditioned multigrid methods for two-dimensional combustion calculation at all speeds. AIAA J. 35 2 (1998) 185-192
8. Liu X.-D., Osher S., and Chan T. Weighted essentially nonoscillatory schemes. J. Comp. Phys. 115 (1994) 200-212
9. Jiang G.-S., and Shu C.-W. Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes. J. Comp. Phys. 126 (1996) 202-228
10. Yang J.-Y., Yang S.-C., Chen Y.-N., and Hsu C.-A. Weighted ENO schemes for the three-dimensional imcompressible Navier-Stokes equations. J. Comp. Phys. 146 (1998) 464-487
11. Yang J.-Y., Perng Y.-C., and Yen R.-H. Implicit weighted essentially nonoscillatory schemes for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations. AIAA J. 39 11 (2001) 2082-2090
12. Yang J.-Y., Yen R.-H., and Perng Y.-C. Three-dimensional wing flow computations using implicit WENO Euler solver. J. of Aircraft 38 6 (2001) 181-184
13. P.R. Spalart, S.R. Allmaras, A One-equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows, AIAA Paper 92-257.
14. J.E. Bardina, P.G. Huang, T.J. Coakley, Turbulence Modeling Validation, Testing and Development, NASA-TM-110446, April 1997.
15. Roe P.L. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors and difference, schemes. J. Comp. Phys. 43 2 (1981) 357-372
16. Yee H.C. Construction of explicit and implicit symmetric TVD schemes and their applications. J. Comp. Phys. 68 (1987) 151-179
17. Henrick A.K., Aslam T.D., and Powers J.M. Mapped weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes: achieving optimal order near critical points. J. Comp. Phys. 207 (2005) 542-567
18. C.M. Hung, W. Kordulla, A Time-split Finite-volume Algorithm for Three-dimensional Flow-field Simulation, AIAA Paper 83-1957.
19. T.J. Coakley, Turbulence Modeling Methods for the Compressible Navier-Stokes Equations, AIAA Paper 83-1693.
20. Siikonen T. An application of Roe's flux-difference splitting for k s(-) ε{lunate} turbulence model. Int. J. for Numer. Meth. Fluids 21 (1995) 1017-1039
21. Yoon S., and Kwak D. Implicit Navier-Stokes solver for three-dimensional compressible flows. AIAA J. 30 11 (1992) 2653-2659
22. Ghia U., Ghia K.N., and Shin C.T. High-Re solutions for incompressible flow using the Navier-Stokes equations and a multigrid method. J. Comp. Phys. 48 (1982) 387-411
23. D.M. Somers, Design and Experimental Results for the S809 Airfoil, NREL/SR-440-6918, 1997.
24. H.U. Meier, T. Cebeci, Flow characteristics of a body of revolution at incidence, in: Third Symposium on Numerical and Physical Aspects of Aerodynamic Flows, Long Beach, CA, January 21-24, 1985.
25. V. Schmitt, F. Charpin, Pressure Distributions on the ONERA-M6-Wing at Transonic Mach Numbers AGARD-AR-138 B1-1, May 1979.
26. J.D. Gray, Summary Report on Aerodynamic Characteristics of Standard Models HB-1 and HB-2, AEDC-TDR-64-137, July 1964.
27. J.D. Gray, E.E. Lindsay, Force Tests of Standard Hypervelocity Ballistic Models HB-1 and HB-2 at Mach 1.5 to 10, AEDC-TDR-64-246, November 1964.