Chapter 9 The role of qualitative research in identifying residents' perspectives about social mix

Studies in Qualitative Methodology

Volumn 10, Issue , 2008, Pages 209-225

  Arthurson, Kathy ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 56549093813     PISSN: 10423192     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S1042-3192(08)10009-X     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Arthurson K. Creating inclusive communities through balancing social mix: A critical relationship or tenuous link?. Urban Policy and Research 20 (2002) 245-261
2. Arthurson K. Australian public housing and the diverse histories of social mix. Journal of Urban History 34 (2008) 484-501
3. Atkinson R., and Kintrea K. Owner occupation, social mix and neighbourhood impacts. Policy and Politics 28 (2000) 93-108
4. Atkinson R., and Kintrea K. Opportunities and despair, it's all in there: Practitioner experiences and explanations of area effects and life chances. Sociology 38 (2004) 437-456
5. Beekman T., Lyons F., and Scott J. Improving the understanding of the influence of owner occupiers in mixed tenure neighbourhoods (2001), ODS Ltd for Scottish Homes, Edinburgh
6. Blasius J., Friedrichs J., and Galster G. Introduction: Frontiers of quantifying neighbourhood effects. Housing Studies 22 (2007) 627-636
7. De Souza Briggs, X. (1997). Yonkers revisited: The early impacts of scattered-site public housing on families and neighbourhoods. Unpublished Report to the Ford Foundation.
8. De Souza Briggs X. Re-shaping the geography of opportunity: Place effects in global perspective. Housing Studies 18 (2003) 915-936
9. De Souza Briggs X., Darden J., and Aidala A. In the wake of desegregation, early impacts of scattered-site public housing on neighbourhoods in Yonkers, New York. Journal of the American Planning Association 65 (1999) 27-49
10. Feins J., and Shroder M. Moving to opportunity: The demonstration's design and its effects on mobility. Urban Studies 42 (2005) 1275-1299
11. In: Friedrichs J., Galster G., and Musterd S. (Eds). Neighbourhood effects on social opportunities: The European and American research and policy context, Editorial. Housing Studies 18 (2003) 797-806
12. Galster G. Investigating behavioural impacts of poor neighbourhoods: Towards new data and analytic strategies. Housing Studies 18 (2003) 893-914
13. Galster G. Neighbourhood social mix as a goal of housing policy: A theoretical; analysis. European Journal of Housing Policy 7 (2007) 19-43
14. Galster G., and Zobel A. Will dispersed housing programs reduce social problems in the US?. Housing Studies 13 (1998) 605-622
15. Goetz E. Forced relocation vs. voluntary mobility: The effects of dispersal programs on households. Housing Studies 17 (2002) 107-123
16. Hiscock, R. (2002). Mixing tenures: Is it good for social wellbeing? Paper presented at the European Network for Housing Research Conference, Vienna, 1-5 July.
17. Jacobs, K., & Arthurson, K. (2003). Can effective housing management policies address anti-social behaviour. Final Report for the Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute (AHURI). http://www.ahuri.edu.au
18. Johnson M.P., Ladd H.F., and Ludwig J. The benefits and costs of residential mobility programmes for the poor. Housing Studies 17 (2002) 125-138
19. Jupp B. Living together: Community life on mixed housing estates (1999), Demos, London
20. Kleinhans R. Social implications of housing diversification in urban renewal: A review of recent literature. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 19 (2004) 367-390
21. Leventhal T., and Brooks-Gunn J. Moving to opportunity: An experimental study of neighbourhood effects on mental health. American Journal of Social Housing 93 (2003) 1576-1582
22. Massey D., and Kanaiaupuni S. Public housing and the concentration of poverty. Social Sciences Quarterly 74 (1993) 109-122
23. Orr L., Feins J., Jacob R., Beecroft E., Sanbonmatsu L., Katz L., Liebman J., and Kling J. Moving to opportunity interim impacts evaluation. Final Report (2003), Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington
24. Peel M. The rise and fall of social mix in an Australian new town. Journal of Urban History 22 (1995) 121
25. Popkin, S., Harris, J., & Cunningham, M. (2002). Families in transition: A qualitative analysis of the MTO experience. Final Report. Prepared for the US Department of Housing and Urban Development under a subcontract with Abt Associates Inc. Washington, DC; US Department of Housing and Urban Development.
26. Popkin S., Katz B., Cunningham M., Brown K., Gustafson J., and Turner M. Decade of HOPE VI: Research findings and policy challenges (2004), Urban Institute, Washington
27. Rose, D. (2004). The uneasy cohabitation of gentrification and 'social mix': A case study of residents of infill condominiums in Montreal. Working Paper. INRS, Urbanisation, Culture et Societe.
28. Ruming K., Mee K., and McGuirk P. Questioning the rhetoric of social mix: Courteous community or hidden hostility?. Australian Geographical Studies 42 (2004) 234-237
29. Sarkissian W. The idea of social mix in town planning: An historical overview. Urban Studies 13 (1976) 231-246
30. Scottish Council Foundation. Three nations: Social exclusion in Scotland (1998), Scottish Council Foundation, Edinburgh
31. Scottish Homes. Assessing the impact of tenure diversification: The case of Niddrie (1999), Scottish Homes, Edinburgh
32. Thompson S. The quest for heartful environments: A qualitative researcher's journey. Urban Policy and Research 24 (2006) 17-38
33. Varady D., and Walker C. Housing vouchers and residential mobility. Journal of Planning Literature 18 (2003) 17-30
34. Wood M. A balancing act tenure diversification in Australia and the UK. Urban Policy and Research 21 (2003) 45-56