Selective nontarget inhibition in Multiple Object Tracking

Visual Cognition

Volumn 16, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 1011-1021

  Pylyshyn, Zenon W ^a   Haladjian, H Haroutioun ^a   King, Charles E ^a   Reilly, James E ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Multiple object tracking; Nontarget inhibition; Probe dot detection; Segregation by depth; Tracking; Visual attention

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE TRACKING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION;

EID: 56449110318     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: 14640716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13506280802247486     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bahrami, B. (2003) Object property encoding and change blindness in multiple object tracking. Visual Cognition, 10:8, pp. 949-963.
2. Comtois, R. (1999)
3. Julesz, B. (1971) Foundations of Cyclopean perception, University of Chicago Press, Chicago
4. McLeod, P., Driver, J., Dienes, Z. and Crisp, J. (1991) Filtering by movement in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17:1, pp. 55-64.
5. Nakayama, K. and Silverman, G. H. (1986) Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions. Nature, 320:6059, pp. 264-265.
6. Ogawa, H., Takeda, Y. and Yagi, A. (2002) Inhibitory tagging on randomly moving objects. Psychological Science, 13:2, pp. 125-129.
7. Olivers, C. N. J., Watson, D. G. and Humphreys, G. W. (1999) Visual marking of locations and feature maps: Evidence from within-dimension defined conjunctions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52:3, pp. 679-715.
8. Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2001) Visual indexes, preconceptual objects, and situated vision. Cognition, 80:12, pp. 127-158.
9. Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2003) Seeing and visualizing: It's not what you think, MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambridge, MA
10. Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2004) Some puzzling findings in multiple object tracking (MOT): I. Tracking without keeping track of object identities. Visual Cognition, 11:7, pp. 801-822.
11. Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2006) Some puzzling findings in multiple object tracking (MOT): II. Inhibition of moving nontargets. Visual Cognition, 14:2, pp. 175-198.
12. Pylyshyn, Z. W. and Storm, R. W. (1988) Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spatial Vision, 3:3, pp. 1-19.
13. Scholl, B. J. and Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1999) Tracking multiple items through occlusion: Clues to visual objecthood. Cognitive Psychology, 38:2, pp. 259-290.
14. Scholl, B. J., Pylyshyn, Z. W. and Franconeri, S. L. (1999) When are featural and spatiotemporal properties encoded as a result of attentional allocation?. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 40:4, p. 4195.
15. Theeuwes, J. (2004) Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11:1, pp. 65-70.
16. Tipper, S. P., Brehaut, J. C. and Driver, J. (1990) Selection of moving and static objects for the control of spatially directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16:3, pp. 492-504.
17. Watson, D. G. and Humphreys, G. W. (1997) Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. Psychological Review, 104:1, pp. 90-122.
18. Watson, D. G. and Humphreys, G. W. (1998) Visual marking of moving objects: A role for top-down feature-based inhibition in selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24:3, pp. 946-962.