Some puzzling findings in multiple object tracking (MOT): II. Inhibition of moving nontargets

Visual Cognition

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 175-198

  Pylyshyn, Zenon ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIRECTIONAL VISION; EYE FIXATION; EYE TRACKING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; THEORY; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 33746165144     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: 14640716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13506280544000200     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Alvarez, G. A., Horowitz, J. M., & Wolfe, J. M.(2000). Multielement tracking and visual search use independent resources [Abstract]. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 41(4), S759.
2. Atchley, P. and Jones, S. E. and Hoffman, L. (2003) Visual marking: A convergence of goal- and stimulus-driven processes during visual search Perception and Psychophysics, 65(5), pp. 667-677.
3. Baylis, G. C and Tipper, S. P. and Houghton, G. (1997) Externally cued and internally generated selection: Differences in distractor analysis and inhibition Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23(6), pp. 1617-1630.
4. Braithwaite, J. J. and Humphreys, G. W. (2003) Inhibition and anticipation in visual search: Evidence from effects of color foreknowledge on preview search Perception and Psychophysics, 65(2), pp. 213-237.
5. Braithwaite, J. J. and Humphreys, G. W. and Hodsoll, J. (2003) Color grouping in space and time: Evidence from negative color-based carryover effects in preview search Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(4), pp. 758-778.
6. Burkell, J. and Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1997) Searching through subsets: A test of the visual indexing hypothesis Spatial Vision, 11(2), pp. 225-258.
7. Cave, K. and Bichot, N. (1999) Visuospatial attention: Beyond a spotlight model Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, pp. 204-223.
8. Cave, K. R. (1999) The FeatureGate model of visual selection Psychological Research, 62(2-3), pp. 182-194.
9. Cepeda, N. J. and Cave, K. R. and Bichot, N. P. and Kim, M.-S. (1998) Spatial selection via feature-driven inhibition of distractor locations Perception and Psychophysics, 60(5), pp. 727-746.
10. Cheal, M. and Lyon, D. R. and Gottlob, L. R. (1994) A framework for understanding the allocation of attention in location-precued discrimination Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, pp. 699-739.
11. Christ, S. E. and McCrae, C. S. and Abrams, R. A. (2002) Inhibition of return in static and dynamic displays Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9(1), pp. 80-85.
12. Cohen, E. H. and Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2002) Searching through subsets of moving items [Abstract] Journal of Vision, 2(1), pp. 541a.
13. Comtois, R.(2003) VisionShell PPC Software libraries. Cambridge MA: Harvard Vision Laboratory.
14. Dawson, M. and Pylyshyn, Z. W.(1988) Natural constraints in apparent motion. In Computational processes in human vision: An interdisciplinary perspective. (pp. 99-120). Stamford CT: Ablex Publishing.
15. Donk, M. and Theeuwes, J. (2001) Visual marking beside the mark: Prioritizing selection by abrupt onsets Perception and Psychophysics, 63(5), pp. 891-900.
16. Green, S. B. and Salkind, N. J. and Aken, T. M.(2000) Using SPSS for Windows 2nd ed. London: Prentice Hall.
17. Horowitz, T. S.(1996) Spatial attention: Inhibition of distractor locations. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.
18. Houghton, G. and Tipper, S. P. (1996) Inhibitory mechanisms of neural and cognitive control: Applications to selective attention and sequential action Brain and Cognition, 30(1), pp. 20-43.
19. Humphreys, G. W. and Stalmann, B. J. and Olivers, C. (2004) An analysis of the time course of attention in preview search Perception and Psychophysics, 66(5), pp. 713-730.
20. Intriligator, J. and Cavanagh, P. (1992) Object-specific spatial attention facilitation that does not travel to adjacent spatial locations (Abstract) Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 33, pp. 2849.
21. Julesz, B.(1971) Foundations of Cyclopean perception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Kerzel, D. (2003) Attention maintains mental extrapolation of target position: Irrelevant distractors eliminate forward displacement after implied motion Cognition, 88(1), pp. 109-131.
23. Klein, R. (2000) Inhibition of return Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(4), pp. 138-147.
24. Klein, R. M. (1988) Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search Nature, 334(6181), pp. 430-431.
25. Koch, C and Ullman, S. (1985) Shifts in selective visual attention: Towards the underlying neural circuitry Human Neurobiology, 4, pp. 219-227.
26. Koshino, H. (2001) Activation and inhibition of stimulus features in conjunction search Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8(2), pp. 294-300.
27. Kunar, M. A. and Humphreys, G. W. and Smith, K. J. (2003) Visual change with moving displays: More evidence for color feature map inhibition during preview search Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(4), pp. 779-792.
28. Kunar, M. A. and Humphreys, G. W. and Smith, K. J. and Hulleman, J. (2003) What is "marked" in visual marking? Evidence for effects of configuration in preview search Perception and Psychophysics, 65(6), pp. 982-996.
29. Leslie, A. M. and Xu, F. and Tremolet, P. D. and Scholl, B. J. (1998) Indexing and the object concept: Developing "what" and "where" systems Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(1), pp. 10-18.
30. Marr, D.(1982) Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
31. Milner, P. M. (1957) The cell assembly: Mark II Psychological Review, 64, pp. 242-252.
32. Mueller, H. J. and van Muehlenen, A. (2000) Probing distractor inhibition in visual search: Inhibition of return Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance., 26(5), pp. 1591-1605.
33. Ogawa, H. and Takeda, Y. and Yagi, A. (2002) Inhibitory tagging on randomly moving objects Psychological Science, 13(2), pp. 125-129.
34. Olivers, C. N. L. and Humphreys, G. W. (2003) Visual marking inhibits singleton capture Cognitive Psychology, 47(1), pp. 1-2.
35. Olivers, C. N. J. and Watson, D. G. and Humphreys, G. W. (1999) Visual marking of locations and feature maps: Evidence from within-dimension defined conjunctions Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A(3), pp. 679-715.
36. Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2001) Visual indexes, preconceptual objects, and situated vision Cognition, 80(1/2), pp. 127-158.
37. Pylyshyn, Z. W.(2003) Seeing and visualizing: It's not what you think. Cambridge MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
38. Pylyshyn Z. W. (2004) Some puzzling findings in multiple object tracking (MOT): I. Tracking without keeping track of object identities Visual Cognition, 11(7), pp. 801-822.
39. Pylyshyn, Z. W. and Storm, R. W. (1988) Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism Spatial Vision, 3(3), pp. 1-19.
40. Scholl, B. J. (2001) Objects and attention: The state of the art Cognition, 80(1/2), pp. 1-46.
41. Scholl, B. J. and Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1999) Tracking multiple items through occlusion: Clues to visual objecthood Cognitive Psychology, 38(2), pp. 259-290.
42. Sears, C. R. and Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2000) Multiple object tracking and attentional processes Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54(1), pp. 1-14.
43. Strawson, P. F.(1963) Individuals: An essay in descriptive metaphysics. New York: Anchor Books.
44. Theeuwes, J. and Kramer, A. F. and Atchley, P. (1998) Visual marking of old objects Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5(1), pp. 130-134.
45. Tipper, S. P. and Driver, J. and Weaver, B. (1991) Object-centred inhibition of return of visual attention Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, pp. 289-298.
46. Trick, L. M. and Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1994) Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited capacity preattentive stage in vision Psychological Review, 101(1), pp. 80-102.
47. Ullman, S. (1976) Relaxation and constrained optimization by local processes Computer Graphics and Image Processing, 10, pp. 115-125.
48. Ullman, S.(1979) The interpretation of visual motion. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
49. Ullman, S. (1984) Visual routines Cognition, 18, pp. 97-159.
50. Wallach, H. and O'Connell, D. N. (1953) The kinetic depth effect Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, pp. 205-217.
51. Watson, D. G. (2001) Visual marking in moving displays: Feature-based inhibition is not necessary Perception and Psychophysics, 55(1), pp. 74-84.
52. Watson, D. G. and Humphreys, G. W. (1997) Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects Psychological Review, 104(1), pp. 90-122.
53. Watson, D. G. and Humphreys, G. W. (1998) Visual marking of moving objects: A role for top-down feature-based inhibition in selection Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(3), pp. 946-962.
54. Watson, D. G. and Humphreys, G. W. (2000) Visual marking: Evidence for inhibition using a probe-dot detection paradigm Perception and Psychophysics, 62(3), pp. 471-81.
55. Watson, D. G. and Humphreys, G. W. and Olivers, C. N. L. (2003) Visual marking: Using time in visual selection Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(4), pp. 180-186.
56. Watson, D. G. and Humphreys, G. W. and Olivers, C. N. L.(2004) Visual marking: Using time as well as space in visual selection. In Psychophysics beyond sensation: Laws and invariants of human cognition. (pp. 289-309). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
57. Wolfe, J. M. and Pokorny, C. W. (1990) Inhibitory tagging in visual search: A failure to replicate Perception and Psychophysics, 48(4), pp. 357-362.