Challenging dominant physics paradigms

Journal of Scientific Exploration

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 421-438

  Campanario, Juan Miguel ^a   Martin, Brian ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALCALÁ   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

Author keywords

Alternatives; Challengers; Orthodoxy; Paradigms; Physics

Indexed keywords

PERSONNEL; PHYSICS; PUBLISHING; SOCIAL SCIENCES; STUDENTS; WEBSITES;

PARASCYCHOLOGY; PHYSICS PARADIGMS; PHYSICS THEORIES; SCIENTISTS;

ENGINEERING RESEARCH;

EID: 5644227836     PISSN: 08923310     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Arp, H. 1987. Quasars, Redshifts, and Controversies. Berkeley, CA: Interstellar Media.
2. Arp, H. 1998. Seeing Red: Redshifts, Cosmology and Academic Science. Montreal: Apeiron.
3. Assis, A. K. T. 1994. Weber's Electrodynamics (Fundamental Theories of Physics, Vol. 66). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
4. Assis, A. K. T. 1999. Relational Mechanics. Montreal Apeiron.
5. Barber, B. 1961. Resistance by scientists to scientific discovery. Science, 134: 596-602.
6. Barnes, B. 1974. Scientific Knowledge and Sociological Theory. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
7. Barnes, B. 1977. Interests and the Growth of Knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
8. Barnes, B. 1982. T. S. Kuhn and Social Science. London: Macmillan.
9. Bauer, H. H. 1984. Beyond Velikovsky: The History of a Public Controversy. University of Illinois Press.
10. Bauer, H. H. 1992. Scientific Literacy and the Myth of the Scientific Method. University of Illinois Press.
11. Bond, M. 2000. Father earth (interview with James Lovelock). New Scientist, 167(9 September): 44-47.
12. Bourdieu, P. 1975. The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason, Social Science Information, 14: 19-47.
13. Bourdieu, P. 1988. Homo Academicus. Cambridge: Polity Press.
14. Brush, S. G. 1990. Prediction and theory evaluation: Alfvén on space plasma phenomena. Eos, 71(9 January): 19-33.
15. Campanario, J. M. 1993a. Not in our Nature. Nature, 361: 488.
16. Campanario, J. M. 1993b. Consolation for the scientist: Sometimes it is hard to publish papers that are later highly cited. Social Studies of Science, 23: 342-362.
17. Campanario, J. M. 1995. On influential books and journal articles initially rejected because of negative referees' evaluations. Science Communication, 16: 304-325.
18. Campanario, J. M. 1996. Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47: 302-310.
19. Campanario, J. M. 1997. ¿Por qué a los cientificos y a nuestros alumnos les cuesta tanto, a veces, cambiar sus ideas científicas? Didáctica de las Ciencias Experimentales y Sociales, 11: 31-62.
20. Campanario, J. M. 2004. Rejecting Nobel class papers (in revision).
21. Chalmers, A. 1999. What Is This Thing Called Science? (3rd ed.). Brisbane: University of Queensland Press.
22. Chandrasekhar, S. 1969. The Richtmyer Memorial Lecture - Some historical notes. American Journal of Physics, 37: 577-584.
23. Chia, A. 1998. Seeing and believing. Science Communication, 19(4): 366-391.
24. Chinn, C. A. and Brewer, W. F. 1993. The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63: 1-49.
25. Collins, H. M. 1985. Changing Order. London: Sage.
26. Collins, H. M. 1999. Tantalus and the aliens: publications, audiences and the search for gravitational waves. Social Studies of Science, 29 (2): 163-197.
27. Crane, D. 1972. Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities. University of Chicago Press.
28. Devine, T. 1997. The Whistleblower's Survival Guide: Courage Without Martyrdom. Washington, DC: Fund for Constitutional Government.
29. Feyerabend, P. 1975. Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge. London: New Left Books.
30. Freeman, L. J. 1981. Nuclear Witnesses: Insiders Speak Out. New York: Norton.
31. Fuller, S. 2000. Thomas Kuhn: A Philosophical History for our Times. University of Chicago Press.
32. Hess, D. J. 1992. Disciplining Heterodoxy, Circumventing Discipline: Parapsychology, Anthropologically. In Hess, D., & Layne, L. (Eds.) Knowledge and Society: The Anthropology of Science and Technology, Vol. 9. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 223-252.
33. Hook, E. B., Ed. 2002. Prematurity in Scientific Discovery: On Resistance and Neglect. University of California Press.
34. Horrobin, D. 1989. The grants game. Nature , 339(29 June): 654.
35. Horrobin, D. F. 1990. The philosophical basis of peer review and the suppression of innovation. Journal of the American Medical Association, 263: 1438-1441.
36. Hoyle, F., & Chandra W. 1978. Lifecloud. London: Dent.
37. Hunt, Bruce J. 1983. 'Practice vs. theory': The British electrical debate, 1888-1891. Isis, 74: 341-355.
38. Illert, Chris. 1992/1993. Alchemy Today. Wollongong, Australia: The author.
39. Kuhn, T. S. 1963. The function of dogma in scientific research. In Crombie, A. C. (Ed.), Scientific change. London: Heinemann, 347-369.
40. Kuhn, T. S. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
41. Lakatos, I. 1970. Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A. (Eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press, 91-196.
42. Mahoney, M. J. 1976. Scientist as Subject: The Psychological Imperative. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
43. Martin, B. 1981. The scientific straightjacket: the power structure of science and the suppression of environmental scholarship. Ecologist, 11(1, January/February): 33-43.
44. Martin, B. 1986. Nuclear suppression. Science and Public Policy , 13 (6): 312-320.
45. Martin, B., Ed. 1996. Confronting the Experts. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
46. Martin, B. 1998. Strategies for Dissenting Scientists. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 12: 605-616.
47. Martin, B. 1999a. Suppressing research data: Methods, context, accountability, and responses. Accountability in Research, 6: 333-372.
48. Martin, B. 1999b. Suppression of dissent in science. Research in Social Problems and Public Policy, 7: 105-135.
49. Martin, B. 1999c. The Whistleblower's Handbook: How to Be an Effective Resister. Charlbury, UK: Jon Carpenter.
50. Martin, B. 2004. Dissent and heresy in medicine: models, methods and strategies. Social Science and Medicine, 58: 713-725.
51. Mauskopf, S. H., Ed. 1979. The Reception of Unconventional Science. Boulder, CO: Westview.
52. Medawar, P. 1967. The Art of the Soluble. London: Methuen.
53. Mitroff, I. I. 1974. The Subjective Side of Science: A Philosophical Inquiry into the Psychology of the Apollo Moon Scientists. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
54. Moran, G. 1998. Silencing Scientists and Scholars in other Fields: Power, Paradigm Controls, Peer Review, and Scholarly Communication. Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
55. Mulkay, M. 1979. Science and the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Allen and Unwin.
56. Muller, R. A. 1980. Innovation and scientific funding. Science, 209 (22 August): 880-883.
57. Nissani, M. 1995. The plight of the obscure innovator in science: A few reflections on Campanario's note. Social Studies of Science, 25: 165-183.
58. Pinch, T. 1986. Confronting Nature : The Sociology of Solar Neutrino Detection. Dordrecht: Reidel.
59. Planck, M. 1949. Scientific Autobiography and Other Papers. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
60. Polanyi, M. 1963. The potential theory of adsorption. Science, 141 (13 September): 1010-1013.
61. Popper, K. R. 1963. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
62. Robitaille, P.-M. 2002. The collapse of the big bang and the gaseous sun. New York Times, 17 March (http://www.thermalphysics.org/).
63. Schmidt, H. 1969. Precognition of a quantum process. Journal of Parapsychology, 33(2): 99-108.
64. Schmidt, J. 2000. Disciplined Minds. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
65. Sharma, D. 1996. Confronting the Nuclear Power Structure in India. In Martin, B. (Ed.), Confronting the Experts. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 155-174.
66. Simon, B. 2002. Undead Science: Science Studies and the Afterlife of Cold Fusion. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
67. Sommer, T. J. 2001. Suppression of scientific research: Bahramdipity and Nulltiple Scientific Discoveries. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7 : 77-104.
68. Thompson, C. 1999. The tangled methods of quantum entanglement experiments. Accountability in Research, 6(4): 311-332; http://freespace.virgin.net/ch.thompson1/tangled/tangled.html.
69. Van Flandern, T. 1993. Dark Matter, Missing Planets and New Comets: Paradoxes Resolved, Origins Illuminated (revised edition). Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books.
70. Watson, D. L. 1938. Scientists are Human. London: Watts.
71. Westrum, R. 1977. Social intelligence about anomalies: The case of UFOs. Social Studies of Science, 7: 271-302.
72. Westrum, R. 1978. Science and social intelligence about anomalies: The case of meteorites. Social of Studies Science, 8: 461-493.