The tangled methods of quantum entanglement experiments

Accountability in Research

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 311-332

  Thompson, Caroline H ^a  

^a ABERYSTWYTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bell inequalities; Bias; Data adjustment; Peer review; Photon; Quantum entanglement

Indexed keywords

EID: 0007785579     PISSN: 08989621     EISSN: 15455815     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08989629908573934     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Aspect, A. (1983) Trois tests expérimentaux des inégalités de Bell par mesure de corrélation de polarisation de photons. PhD thesis No. 2674, Université de Paris-Sud, Centre D'Orsay.
2. Aspect, A. and Grangier, P. (1985) Lettere al Nuovo Cimento, 43: 345.
3. Bell, J. (1964) Physics 1: 195.
4. Born, M. (1971) The Born-Einstein letters. Macmillan.
5. Boschi, D. et al. (1997) Physical Review Letters 79: 2755.
6. Clauser, J.F. and Shimony, A. (1978) Reports in Progress in Physics 41: 1881.
7. Duncan, A.J. (1994) Private communication, September 1994.
8. Einstein, A., Podolsky, B. and Rosen, N. (1935) Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Physical Review 47: 777.
9. Gisin, N. (1998) Private communication, March 31, 1998.
10. Greenberger, D. and Zeilinger, A. (1995) Quantum theory still crazy after all these years. Physics World, September 33.
11. Hagley, E. et al. (1997) Physical Review Letters 79: 1.
12. Hardy, L.J. (1997) General discussion at the 6th UK Conference on Conceptual and Mathematical Foundations of Modern Physics, University of Hull, UK, September 8-12, 1997.
13. Heisenberg, W. (1971) Physics and Beyond. George Allen and Unwin.
14. Hofer, W. (1997) Private communication, May 2, 1997.
15. Holt, R.A. and Pipkin, F.M. (1974) Harvard University preprint.
16. Kracklauer, A. (1998) Private communication, May 10, 1998.
17. Lorentz, H.A. (1916) Theory of Electrons. Teubner.
18. Marshall, T.W., Santos, E. and Seilen, F. (1983) Physics letters A 98: 5-9.
19. Matthews, R. (1998) Hidden truths. New Scientist 158 (23 May) 28.
20. PRL (1997a) Communication from Divisional Area Editor, Physical Review Letters, May 23, 1997.
21. PRL (1997b) Referee report, Physical Review Letters, July 18, 1997.
22. PRL (1998) Communication from Editor, Physical Review Letters, May 12, 1998.
23. Rarity, J. (1994) Private communications, October 1994.
24. Santos, E. (1995) Private discussion, University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain, June 1995.
25. Santos, E. (1997) Private communication, December 14, 1997.
26. Selleri, F. (1995a) Private communication, February 21, 1995.
27. Selleri, F. (1995b) Private discussion, University of Bari, Italy, May 1995.
28. Thompson, C.H. (1996) The chaotic ball: an intuitive model for EPR experiments. Foundations of Physics Letters 9: 357. Available at http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/9611037.
29. Thompson, C.H. (1997) Timing, 'accidentals' and other artifacts in EPR experiments. Submitted to Physical Review Letters, April 1997; re-submitted November 1997; rejected, June 1998. Available at http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/9711044.
30. Thompson, C.H. (1998a) Behind the scenes at the EPR magic show. In Selleri, F. (ed). Open Questions in Relativistic Physics. Montreal Apeiron, pp. 351-359. (Proceedings of Athens conference, June 25-28, 1997, on 'Relativistic Physics and some of its Applications'.)
31. Thompson, C.H. (1998b) EPR, magic and the nature of light. In Hunter, G., Vigier, J.-P. and Jeffers, S. (eds). Causality and Locality in Modern Physics, Kluwer, pp. 209-218.
32. Tittel, W., Brendel, J., Gisin, B., Herzog, T. and Gisin, N. (1997) Experimental demonstration of quantum-correlations over more than 10 kilometers. Physical Review A 57: 3229. Available at http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/9707042.
33. Wallace, B. (1993) The Farce of Physics. Available electronically at http://www.europa.com/~rsc.