Smart traceability systems to satisfy consumer expectations

Acta Horticulturae

Volumn 768, Issue , 2008, Pages 407-415

  Hertog, M L A T M ^a   Yudhakusuma, R F ^a   Snoekx, P ^a   De Baerdemaeker, J ^a   Nicolai B M ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b Flanders Centre of Postharvest Technology   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Colour change; Model; RFID label; Tomato; Traceability

Indexed keywords

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM;

EID: 56349136071     PISSN: 05677572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.768.53     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. De Ketelaere, B., Lammertyn, J., Molenberghs, G., Desmet, M., Nicolaï, B. and De Baerdemaeker, J. 2004. Tomato cultivar grouping based on firmness change, shelf-life and variability during postharvest storage. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 34:187-201.
2. De Ketelaere, B., Stulens, J., Lammertyn, J., Cuong, N.V. and De Baerdemaeker, J. 2006. A methodological approach for the identification and quantification of sources of biological variance in postharvest research. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 39:1-9.
3. Hertog, M.L.A.T.M. 2004. Biological variation, Chapter 4 in: Quality change modelling in postharvest biology and technology, Ph.D. thesis No 633, K.U. Leuven, Belgium, p. 196. 〈http://perswww.kuleuven.ac.be/~u0040603/ thesis.html〉 (retrieved March, 2006).
4. Hertog, M.L.A.T.M. 2002. The impact of biological variation on postharvest population dynamics. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 26:253-263.
5. Hertog, M.L.A.T.M., Lammertyn, J., Desmet, M., Scheerlinck, N. and Nicolaï, B.M. 2004. The impact of biological variation on postharvest behaviour of tomato fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 34:271-284.
6. Hertog, M.L.A.T.M., Lammertyn, J., Scheerlinck, N. and Nicolaï, B.M. 2006b. The impact of biological variation on postharvest behaviour; The case of dynamic temperature conditions. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 43:183-192.
7. Hertog, M.L.A.T.M., Scheerlinck, N., Lammertyn, J. and Nicolaï, B.M. 2006a. The impact of biological variation on postharvest behaviour of Belgian endive: the case of multiple stochastic variables. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 43:78-88.
8. Lammertyn, J., De Ketelaere, B., Marquenie, D., Molenberghs, G. and Nicolaï, B.M. 2003. Mixed models for multicategorical repeated response: modelling the time effect of physical treatments on strawberry sepal quality. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 30:195-207.
9. Scheerlinck, N., Peirs, A., Desmet, M., Schenk, A. and Nicolaï, B.M. 2004. Modeling fruit characteristics during apple maturation: A stochastic approach. Math. Comp. Model. Dyn. 10:149-168.
10. Schouten, R.E., Jongbloed, G., Tijskens, L.M.M. and Van Kooten, O. 2004. Batch variability and cultivar keeping quality of cucumber. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 32:299-310.
11. Schouten, R.E., Tijskens, L.M.M. and Van Kooten, O. 2002. Predicting keeping quality of batches of cucumber fruit based on a physiological mechanism. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 26:209-220.
12. Schouten, R.E. 2004. 'Physiology of biological variation', PhD Thesis, Wageningen University, ISBN: 90-5808-851-0.
13. Tijskens, L.M.M. and Wilkinson, E.C. 1996. Behaviour of biological variability in batches during postharvest storage. Asp. Appl. Biol. 46:267-268.
14. Tijskens, L.M.M., Konopacki, P. and Simčič, M. 2003. Biological variance, burden or benefit? Postharvest Biol. Technol. 27:15-25.