Natural Decompositions of Perceived Transparency: Reply to Albert (2008)

Psychological Review

Volumn 115, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 1144-1151

  Anderson, Barton L ^a,b   Singh, Manish ^c   O'Vari, Judit ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^c RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

lightness; perceptual organization; scission; transparency

Indexed keywords

EID: 56349120591     PISSN: 0033295X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0013666     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Albert M.K. The role of contrast in the perception of achromatic transparency: Comment on Singh & Anderson (2002) and Anderson (2003). Psychological Review 115 (2008) 1127-1143
2. Anderson B.L. A theory of illusory lightness and transparency in monocular and binocular images: The role of contour junctions. Perception 26 (1997) 419-453
3. Anderson B.L. Stereoscopic surface perception. Neuron 26 (1999) 919-928
4. Anderson B.L. The role of occlusion in the perception of depth, lightness, and opacity. Psychological Review 110 (2003) 762-784
5. Anderson B.L., Singh M., and Meng J. The perceived transmittance of inhomogeneous surfaces and media. Vision Research 46 (2006) 1982-1995
6. Anderson B.L., and Winawer J. Image segmentation and lightness perception. Nature 434 (2005, March 3) 79-83
7. Anderson B.L., and Winawer J. Layered image representations and the computation of surface lightness. Journal of Vision 8 (2008) 1-22 doi: 10.1167/8.7.18
8. Chubb C., Sperling G., and Solomon J. Texture interactions determine perceived contrast. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA 86 (1989) 9631-9635
9. D'Zmura M., and Singer B. Contrast gain control. In: Sharpe L.T., and Gegenfurtner K.R. (Eds). Color vision: From genes to perception (1999), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England 369-385
10. Ekroll V., Faul F., and Niederee R. The peculiar nature of simultaneous contrast in uniform surrounds. Vision Research 44 (2004) 1765-1786
11. Faul F., Ekroll V., and Wendt G. Color appearance: The limited role of chromatic surround variance in the "gamut expansion effect.". Journal of Vision 8 3 (2008) 1-20
12. Metelli F. Achromatic color conditions in the perception of transparency. In: MacLeod R.B., and Pick H.L. (Eds). Perception: Essays in honor of J. J. Gibson (1974), Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY 95-116
13. Metelli F. The perception of transparency. Scientific American 230 (1974, April) 90-98
14. Metelli F. Stimulation and perception of transparency. Psychological Research 47 (1985) 185-202
15. Robilotto R., Khang B., and Zaidi Q. Sensory and physical determinants of perceived achromatic transparency. Journal of Vision 2 5 (2002) 388-403
16. Robilotto R., and Zaidi Q. Perceived transparency of neutral density filters across dissimilar backgrounds. Journal of Vision 4 3 (2004) 183-195
17. Singh M., and Anderson B.L. Toward a perceptual theory of transparency. Psychological Review 109 (2002) 492-519
18. Singh M., and Anderson B.L. Photometric determinants of perceived transparency. Vision Research 46 (2006) 879-894
19. Solomon J., Sperling G., and Chubb C. The lateral inhibition of perceived contrast is indifferent to on-center/off-center segregation, but specific to orientation. Vision Research 33 (1993) 2671-2683
20. Wyszecki G., and Stiles W.S. Color science: Concepts and methods, quantitative data and formulae. 2nd ed. (1982), Wiley, New York