Writing manuscripts for peer review: Your guide to not annoying reviewers and increasing your chances of success

Sexuality and Disability

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 229-240

  Kalpakjian, Claire Z ^a   Meade, Michelle ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Getting published; Peer review; Reviewers; Writing manuscripts

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; LEARNING; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PEER REVIEW; SKILL; WRITING;

EID: 56349117470     PISSN: 01461044     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11195-008-9090-z     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. RJ Arceci 2004 The art and science of writing manuscripts Pediatric Blood & Cancer 43 3 207 210
2. LN Carraway 2006 Improve scientific writing and avoid perishing Am. Midl. Nat. 155 2 383 394
3. PW Fried AS Wechsler 2001 How to get your paper published J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 121 4 S3 S7
4. MJ Kern HN Bonneau 2003 Approach to manuscript preparation and submission: How to get your paper accepted Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 58 3 391 396
5. HB El-Serag 2006 Scientific manuscripts: the fun of writing and submitting Gastrointest. Endosc. 64 6 S19 S22
6. Citation. Impact Factor. (2008, April 1). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieve April 10, 2008, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Impact_factor
7. S Cetin DJ Hackam 2005 An approach to the writing of a scientific manuscript J. Surg. Res. 128 2 165 167
8. JM Provenzale 2007 Ten Principles to Improve the Likelihood of Publication of a Scientific Manuscript Am J Roentgenol. 188 5 1179 1182
9. Dijkers, M., Brown, M., Gordon, W.: Getting published and having an impact: turning rehabilitation research results into gold. National Center for the Dissemination of Disability Research (NDCRR), SEDL (2008)
10. J Smart 2005 Attributes of exemplary research manuscripts employing quantitative analyses Res. High. Educ. 46 4 461 477
11. L Wilkinson 1999 Inference TTFoS Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations Am. Psychol. 54 594 604
12. DL Streiner 2007 A shortcut to rejection: How not to write the results section of a paper Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. 52 6 385 389
13. M Dijkers GC Kropp RM Esper G Yavuzer N Cullen Y Bakdalieh 2002 Quality of intervention research reporting in medical rehabilitation journals Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 81 21 33
14. MV Johnston RA Keith SR Hinderer 1992 Measurement Standards for Interdisciplinary Medical Rehabilitation Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 73 12 S3 S23
15. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: writing and editing for biomedical publication. http://www.icmje.org/icmje.pdf. Accessed 3 March 2008
16. Dickersin, K., Ssemanda, E., Mansell, C., Rennie, D.: What do the JAMA editors say when they discuss manuscripts that they are considering for publication? Developing a schema for classifying the content of editorial discussion. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 7 (2007)
17. FG Hoppin 2002 How I review an original scientific article Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 166 8 1019 1023