Configuration management and maintenance ranking by reliability importance measures

Proceedings of the European Safety and Reliability Conference 2006, ESREL 2006 - Safety and Reliability for Managing Risk

Volumn 1, Issue , 2006, Pages 633-641

  Vaurio, J K ^a  

^a LAPPEENRANTA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LARGE SCALE SYSTEMS; MAINTENANCE; PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE; QUALITY ASSURANCE; RELIABILITY THEORY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT;

BIRNBAUM IMPORTANCES; CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENTS; IMPORTANCE MEASURES; MAKING DECISIONS; NON-COHERENT; RELIABILITY IMPORTANCES; SYSTEM RELIABILITIES; TESTING AND MAINTENANCES; USEFUL PROPERTIES;

RELIABILITY; RELIABILITY THEORY;

BIRNBAUM IMPORTANCE; COMMON CAUSE FAILURE; CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT; IMPORTANCE MEASURE; MAKING DECISION; NON-COHERENT; RELIABILITY IMPORTANCE; SYSTEM RELIABILITY; TESTING AND MAINTENANCE; USEFUL PROPERTIES;

EID: 56249138989     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Andsten, R. & Vaurio, J.K. 1989. Advanced Accident Sequence Quantification Techniques Developed in Loviisa 1 PSA. Proc. PSA'89 Intl. Mtg. on Probability, Reliability and Safety Assessment: 965-971. Pittsburgh, 2-7 April 1989. La Grange Park: American Nuclear Society.
2. Andsten, R.S. & Vaurio, J.K. 1992. Sensitivity, Uncertainty and Importance Analysis of a Risk Assessment. Nuclear Technology 98: 160-170.
3. Borgonovo, E. & Apostolakis, G. 2000. A new importance measure for risk informed decision making. Reliab Engng Syst Safety 72: 195-212.
4. Fleming, K.N. 2003. Issues and recommendations for advancement of PRA technology in risk-informed decision making. Report NUREG/CR-6813. Washington, DC: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
5. Murchland, J. 1973. Fundamental probability relations for repairable items. NATO Advanced Study Institute on Generic Techniques in Systems Reliability Assessment: 17-27. Liverpool: The University of Liverpool.
6. NEI. 2003.10 CFR 50.69 SSC Categorization Guideline. NEI 00-04 (Draft-Revision D).
7. Shepherd, C.H. et al. 2004. RISK MONITORS The State of the Art in their Development and Use at Nuclear Power Plants. Report NEA/CSNI/R(2004)20. Paris: IAEA & OECD NEA WGRisk.
8. Vaurio, J.K. 1995. Optimization of test and maintenance intervals based on risk and cost. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 49: 23-36.
9. Vaurio, J.K. 1998. Safety-related decision making at a nuclear power plant. Nuclear Engineering and Design 185: 335-346.
10. Vaurio, J.K. 2001. Fault tree analysis of phased mission systems with repairable and non-repairable components, Reliability Engineering and System Safety 74: 169-180.
11. Vaurio, J.K. 2006. Developments in importance measures for risk-informed ranking and other applications. In Proc. PSAM 8 conf, New Orleans, 14-19 May 2006: ASME.