Imaging and imagining: Current positions on the epistemic priority of theoretical concepts and data in psychiatric neuroimaging

Current Opinion in Psychiatry

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 625-629

  Huber, Christian G ^a,b   Kummer, Christian ^b   Huber, Johannes ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^b Hochschule fur Philosophie   (Germany)

Author keywords

Neuroimaging; Neuroscience; Philosophy of science; Psychiatry

Indexed keywords

CONCEPT FORMATION; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; EMPATHY; EPISTEMOLOGY; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; MENTAL DISEASE; NEUROBIOLOGY; NEUROIMAGING; PHILOSOPHY; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; REVIEW; THEORETICAL MODEL; WELLBEING;

BRAIN; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MENTAL DISORDERS; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; SPECTROSCOPY, NEAR-INFRARED; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED, SINGLE-PHOTON;

EID: 56249112338     PISSN: 09517367     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e328314b7a1     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Bush GHW. Proclamation 'Decade of the brain', 1990-2000. Proclamation 6158' Federal Register 55 no. 140; 1990. p. 29553.
2. Fusar-Poli P, Broome MR. Conceptual issues in psychiatric neuroimaging. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2006; 19:608-612.
3. Albus JS, Bekey GA, Holland JH, et al. A proposal for a decade of the mind initiative. Science 2007; 317:1321. Albus et al. propose an interdisciplinary research initiative, the decade of the mind, with a focus on the four areas of mental health, research on high-level cognitive functions, education and computational applications.
4. Spitzer M. Decade of the mind. Philos Ethics Humanit Med 2008; 3:7.
5. Denys D. How new is the new philosophy of psychiatry? Philos Ethics Humanit Med 2007; 2:22. Denys critically discusses the hypothesis exhibited by Banner and Thornton [6*] and promotes the idea that the philosophical questions currently discussed as part of the 'new philosophy of psychiatry' are not really 'new' but have always been seen as an integral part of psychiatry itself. He warns that establishing a 'philosophy of psychiatry' could lead to the separation of psychiatry from philosophical questions and a decreased impact of the philosophical discussion on clinical psychiatry.
6. Banner NF, Thornton T. The new philosophy of psychiatry: its (recent) past, present and future: a review of the Oxford University Press series International Perspectives in Philosophy and Psychiatry. Philos Ethics Humanit Med 2007; 2:9. Banner and Thornton argue that a new (i.e. not based on the phenomenological-existential and the continental tradition) philosophy of psychiatry mainly based on analytic philosophy has been recently forming and is already flourishing. The authors regard this development as a novel and welcome addition to philosophy and mental heath care.
7. Heinze M, Kupke C. The role of philosophy in psychiatry. Nervenarzt 2006; 77:346-349.
8. Fuchs T. Ethical issues in neuroscience. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2006; 19:600-607.
9. Evers K. Towards a philosophy for neuroethics. An informed materialist view of the brain might help to develop theoretical frameworks for applied neuroethics. EMBO Rep 2007; 8 (Spec No):S48-S51. Evers proposes to use the concept of informed materialism to provide a consistent framework for neuroscience and the interpretation of its sociological implications.
10. Canli T, Brandon S, Casebeer W, et al. Neuroethics and national security. Am J Bioeth 2007; 7:3-13.
11. Illes J. Empirical neuroethics. Can brain imaging visualize human thought? Why is neuroethics interested in such a possibility? EMBO Rep 2007; 8 (Spec No):S57-S60. In this personal opinion in the science and society section of EMBO Reports, Illes states why neuroimaging cannot directly 'visualize human thought'. She concludes that, nevertheless, neuroethicists should be highly interested in brain imaging and gives an outlook on future developments in the field of neuroethics.
12. Illies J, Bird SJ. Neuroethics: a modern context for ethics in neuroscience. Trends Neurosci 2006; 29:511-517.
13. Lombera S, Illies J. The international dimensions of neuroethics. Dev World Bioeth 2008 [Epub ahead of print]. Doi:10.1111/J.1471-8847.2008.00235.x Lombera and Illes demonstrate the international dimensions and rapid development of neuroethics research.
14. Illes J, Racine E. Imaging or imagining? A neuroethics challenge informed by genetics. Am J Bioeth 2005; 5:5-18.
15. Huber CG. Interdependence of theoretical concepts and neuroimaging data. Poiesis Prax (in press). In this paper, the author discusses different positions regarding the epistemological priority of theories and experimental data in neuroimaging and provides arguments for an interdependence of both levels. He proposes a common model integrating the different levels of explanation on the basis of the work of Jaspers and Fleck.
16. Shibasaki H. Human brain mapping: hemodynamic response and electro-physiology. Clin Neurophysiol 2008; 119:731-743. A review on the currently available noninvasive techniques in functional neuroimaging covering methods based on hemodynamic principles (fMRI, PET, SPECT and NIRS) and electrophysiological principles (EEG, MEG and TMS) as well as multimodal approaches.
17. Pearlson GD, Calhoun V. Structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging in psychiatric disorders. Can J Psychiatry 2007; 52:158-166. This review covers new approaches to structural and functional neuroimaging in psychiatry and discusses their potential for translation into clinical work.
18. Ogawa S, Lee TM, Kay AR, Tank DW. Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1990; 87:9868-9872.
19. Stehling MK, Turner R, Mansfield P. Echo-planar imaging: magnetic resonance imaging in a fraction of a second. Science 1991; 254:43-50.
20. Logothetis NK. What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI. Nature 2008; 453:869-878. Leaving aside epistemological and ontological issues, Logothetis provides an overview on the capabilities of fMRI and discusses current technical and principal limitations of the method in this excellent review.
21. Peterson BS. Conceptual, methodological, and statistical challenges in brain imaging studies of developmentally based psychopathologies. Dev Psychopathol 2003; 15:811-832.
22. Spiers HJ, Maguire EA. Decoding human brain activity during real-world experiences. Trends Cogn Sci 2007; 11:356-365. Spiers and Maguire provide an overview on fMRI paradigms using naturalistic realworld stimuli and suitable analysis methods.
23. Weiskopf N, Sitaram R, Josephs O, et al. Real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging: methods and applications. Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 25:989-1003. This study reviews technical advances allowing the conduction of real-time fMRI analyses and brain-computer interfaces and gives information on possible applications. 24 Buckner RL, Carroll DC. Self-projection and the brain. Trends Cogn Sci 2007; 11:49-57. On the basis of a review of the current literature, the authors speculate that prediction of future events, remembering past events, and taking the point-of-view of others share a common brain network.
24. Huppert FA, Baylis N. Well being: towards an integration of psychology, neurobiology and social science. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2004; 359:1447-1451.
25. Bowden EM, Jung-Beeman M. Methods for investigating the neural components of insight. Methods 2007; 42:87-99. This review provides advice on methods to study the neural basis of insight by integrating neuropsychological paradigms and patients' self-reports.
26. Singer T. The neuronal basis of empathy and fairness. Novartis Found Symp 2007; 278:20-30; discussion 40, 89-96, 216-221. Singer gives an overview on the neural foundations of empathy and fairness and provides evidence that both share common mechanisms.
27. Haynes JD, Rees G. Decoding mental states from brain activity in humans. Nat Rev Neurosci 2006; 7:523-534.
28. Brass M, Haggard P. To do or not to do: the neural signature of self-control. J Neurosci 2007; 27:9141-9145. This review summarizes recent research on the neural basis of volition using fMRI and discusses the role of paradigms that involve voluntarily cancelling decisions.
29. Huber L. Visualisations of psychiatric disorders via fMRI? Searching for reliable paradigms within psychiatry and their impact on the understanding of psychiatric diseases. Poiesis Prax (in press). Huber gives an overview on methodological difficulties in neuroimaging. Furthermore, she critically discusses the impression that 'imaging' would provide a direct visualization and provides evidence that, for example, cognitive functions 'visualized' by fMRI are in fact technologically constructed scientific objects.
30. Kaposy C. Ethical muscle and scientific interests: a role for philosophy in scientific research. Q Rev Biol 2008; 83:77-86. In a novel and interesting approach, Kaposy shows how ethical arguments can promote improvements in the quality of scientific research and illustrates this hypothesis with an example from neuropsychological research using fMRI.
31. Hutton SB, Ettinger U. The antisaccade task as a research tool in psychopathology: a critical review. Psychophysiology 2006; 43:302-313.
32. Halliday GM. A review of the neuropathology of schizophrenia. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2001; 28:64-65.
33. Werner G. Siren call of metaphor: subverting the proper task of neuroscience. J Integr Neurosci 2004; 3:245-252.
34. Fuchs T. The challenge of neuroscience: psychiatry and phenomenology today. Psychopathology 2002; 35:319-326.
35. Kell DB, Oliver SG. Here is the evidence, now what is the hypothesis? The complementary roles of inductive and hypothesis-driven science in the postgenomic era. Bioessays 2004; 26:99-105.
36. Mossner R, Mikova O, Koutsilieri E, et al. Consensus paper of the WFSBP Task Force on Biological Markers: biological markers in depression. World J Biol Psychiatry 2007; 8:141-174. The authors give an overview on currently available biological markers for major depression and conclude that none of them are sufficiently specific to be included into DSM-V as diagnostic criteria.
37. Phillips ML, Vieta E. Identifying functional neuroimaging biomarkers of bipolar disorder: toward DSM-V. Schizophr Bull 2007; 33:893-904. Phillips and Vieta review recent work on common fMRI findings in bipolar disorder and speculate about their inclusion as diagnostic criteria in DSM-V. They propose to use traits specific for bipolar disorder to simplify differentiation between bipolar and unipolar depression.
38. Hyman SE. Can neuroscience be integrated into the DSM-V? Nat Rev Neurosci 2007; 8:725-732. Hyman summarizes the current debate about the inclusion of biological markers into DSM-V and concludes that, although it is currently premature to do so, the classification system should be constructed in a way to allow inclusion of biomarkers at a later point, and neuroscience can be used to generate a classification system that mirrors nature more closely.
39. Fulford KW. Values in psychiatric diagnosis: developments in policy, training and research. Psychopathology 2005; 38:171-176.
40. Fulford KW, Broome M, Stanghellini G, Thornton T. Looking with both eyes open: fact and value in psychiatric diagnosis? World Psychiatry 2005; 4:78-86.
41. Kirmayer LJ. Beyond the 'new cross-cultural psychiatry': cultural biology, discursive psychology and the ironies of globalization. Transcult Psychiatry 2006; 43:126-144.
42. Prasad A. The (amorphous) anatomy of an invention: the case of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Soc Stud Sci 2007; 37:533-560. Taking the invention of MRI and the difficulties in identifying the real inventor as an example, Prasad discusses the way scientific progress and inventions are made. He argues that the invention itself is contingent upon distributed cognitions and the socioepistemic context.
43. Fugelsang JA, Stein CB, Green AE, Dunbar KN. Theory and data interactions of the scientific mind: evidence from the molecular and the cognitive laboratory. Can J Exp Psychol 2004; 58:86-95.