-
5
-
-
0029395050
-
-
Choudhary M.I., Shahwar D.-E., Zeba P., Jabbar A., Ali I., and Rahman A.-Ur. Phytochemistry 40 (1995) 1243
-
(1995)
Phytochemistry
, vol.40
, pp. 1243
-
-
Choudhary, M.I.1
Shahwar, D.-E.2
Zeba, P.3
Jabbar, A.4
Ali, I.5
Rahman, A.-Ur.6
-
6
-
-
0027524461
-
-
Khan M.T.J., Ashraf M., Tehniyat S., Bukhtair M.K., Ashraf S., and Ahmed W. Fitoterapia 64 (1993) 367
-
(1993)
Fitoterapia
, vol.64
, pp. 367
-
-
Khan, M.T.J.1
Ashraf, M.2
Tehniyat, S.3
Bukhtair, M.K.4
Ashraf, S.5
Ahmed, W.6
-
11
-
-
0000592947
-
-
Vincent V.V., David L., Budhiraja R.D., Sharan S., and Garg K.N. Phytochemistry 22 (1983) 2253
-
(1983)
Phytochemistry
, vol.22
, pp. 2253
-
-
Vincent, V.V.1
David, L.2
Budhiraja, R.D.3
Sharan, S.4
Garg, K.N.5
-
12
-
-
0024239870
-
-
Neogi P., Kawai M., Butsugan Y., Mori Y., and Suzuki M. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 61 (1988) 4479
-
(1988)
Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.
, vol.61
, pp. 4479
-
-
Neogi, P.1
Kawai, M.2
Butsugan, Y.3
Mori, Y.4
Suzuki, M.5
-
13
-
-
56249122201
-
-
note
-
3-MeOH (17:3) eluate. The extraction and isolation procedure was repeated with fruits of W. coagulans (5.0 kg) to get the enough compounds for activity testing.
-
-
-
-
14
-
-
0242429164
-
-
Rahman A.-Ur., Shabbir M., Shahwar D.-E., Choudhary M.I., Voelter W., and Hohnholz D. Heterocycles 47 (1998) 1005
-
(1998)
Heterocycles
, vol.47
, pp. 1005
-
-
Rahman, A.-Ur.1
Shabbir, M.2
Shahwar, D.-E.3
Choudhary, M.I.4
Voelter, W.5
Hohnholz, D.6
-
15
-
-
37049095893
-
-
Glotter E., Abraham A., Gunzberg G., and Kirson I. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. I (1977) 341
-
(1977)
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. I
, pp. 341
-
-
Glotter, E.1
Abraham, A.2
Gunzberg, G.3
Kirson, I.4
-
16
-
-
56249122853
-
-
note
-
13C NMR data are in Table 1.
-
-
-
-
17
-
-
0012958889
-
-
Rahman A.-Ur., Yousaf M., Gul W., Qureshi S., Choudhary M.I., Voelter W., Hoff A., Jens F., and Naz A. Heterocycles 48 (1998) 1801
-
(1998)
Heterocycles
, vol.48
, pp. 1801
-
-
Rahman, A.-Ur.1
Yousaf, M.2
Gul, W.3
Qureshi, S.4
Choudhary, M.I.5
Voelter, W.6
Hoff, A.7
Jens, F.8
Naz, A.9
-
18
-
-
1542798272
-
-
Subramanian S.S., Sethi P.D., Glotter E., Kirson I., and Lavie D. Phytochemistry 10 (1971) 685
-
(1971)
Phytochemistry
, vol.10
, pp. 685
-
-
Subramanian, S.S.1
Sethi, P.D.2
Glotter, E.3
Kirson, I.4
Lavie, D.5
-
21
-
-
56249131707
-
-
note
-
Normoglycemic rats. Male albino rats of Sprague-Dawley strain (body weight 140 ± 20g) were selected for this study. Fasting blood glucose of each animal (14-16 h starvation) was measured and the animals showing blood glucose level between 60 and 80 mg/dl were finally selected and divided into groups of five animals each. Rats of experimental group were orally administered the suspension of the desired compounds at a dose of 100 mg/kg body weight prepared in 1.0% gum acacia. Suspension of the standard drug metformin was given at 100 mg/kg dose level. Animals of control group received vehicle (1.0% gum acacia). An oral sucrose load of 10 g/kg body weight was given to rats of all group exactly post 30 min administration of the test sample/vehicle. Blood glucose level was again measured at 30, 60, 90 and 120 min post administration of sucrose. Food but not water was withheld from the cages during the course of experimentation.
-
-
-
-
22
-
-
56249126705
-
-
note
-
Streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Male albino rats of Sprague-Dawley strain (body weight 140 ± 20 g) was selected for this study. Streptozotocin was dissolved in 100 mM citrate buffer, pH 4.5, and calculated amount of the fresh solution was injected to overnight fasted rats (60 mg/kg) intraperitoneally. Blood glucose was checked 48 h later by glucometer by using glucostrips and animals showing blood glucose values between 144 and 270 mg/dl were selected and divided into groups of five animals each. Rats of experimental groups were administered suspension of the desired test samples orally (made in 1.0% gum acacia) at a dose of 100 mg/kg body weight. Animals of control group were given an equal amount of 1.0% gum acacia. A sucrose load of 2.5 g/kg of body weight was given after 30 min of drug administration. After 30 min of post-sucrose load, blood glucose level was again checked at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and at 6 h, respectively. Comparing the AUC of experimental and control groups determined the percent antihyperglycemic activity.
-
-
-
-
24
-
-
56249131706
-
-
note
-
Type 2 diabetes model, that is, C57BL/KsJ-db/db mice. Hyperglycemic animals were divided into four groups having five animals each. Animals of one group were regarded as control group (orally administered 1% gum acacia) and other groups were treated as experimental groups (treated with suspension of the desired test substances at a dose of 50 mg/kg body weight). The treatment was continued for 10 consecutive days. Animals were dosed daily at a fixed time (10.00-11.00 a.m.) All animals had free access to fresh water and normal diet. Blood glucose profile of each animal was measured by glucometer using glucostrips (Boehringer Mannheim). An oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) of each individual was performed on day 10 after an overnight fast (10 h). Blood was sampled from the tail vein at time 0 min (baseline), followed by 30, 60, 90 and 120 min after an oral glucose load of 3.0 g/kg of body weight. Quantitative glucose tolerance of each animal was calculated by area under curve (AUC) method using Prism Software. Comparing the AUC of experimental and control groups determined the percentage antihyperglycemic activity.
-
-
-
|