Myopia progression in adolescent wearers of soft contact lenses and spectacles

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 76, Issue 7, 1999, Pages 474-479

  Horner, Douglas G ^a   Soni, P Sarita ^a   Salmon, Thomas O ^b   Swartz, Tracy Schroeder ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTHEASTERN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adolescent vision correction; Contact lenses; Myopia; Myopia progression; Refractive error; Spectacles

Indexed keywords

CONTACT LENSES; EYEGLASSES;

MYOPIA PROGRESSION;

OPHTHALMOLOGY;

ACCOMMODATION; ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; ASTIGMATISM; CHILD; EXTENDED WEAR CONTACT LENS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MYOPIA; OXYGEN TRANSPORT; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFRACTION ERROR; SELF ESTEEM; SOFT CONTACT LENS; SPECTACLES; WATER CONTENT;

ADOLESCENT; ASTIGMATISM; CHILD; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; DISEASE PROGRESSION; EYEGLASSES; HUMANS; INFANT; MYOPIA; REFRACTION, OCULAR;

EID: 0032803185     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199907000-00023     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Soni PS, Horner DG, Jimenez L, Ross J, Rounds J. Will young children comply and follow instructions to successfully wear soft contact lenses? CLAO J 1995;21:86-92.
2. Soni PS, Horner DG, Ross J. Ocular response to lens care systems in adolescent soft contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci 1996;73:70-85.
3. Terry RL, Soni PS, Horner DG. Spectacles, contact lenses, and children's self-concepts: a longitudinal study. Optom Vis Sci 1997;74: 1044-8.
4. Harris MG, Sarver MD, Poise KA. Corneal curvature and refractive error changes associated with wearing hydrogel contact lenses. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1975;52:313-9.
5. Grosvenor T. Changes in corneal curvature and subjective refraction of soft contact lens wearers. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1975;52: 405-13.
6. Barnett WA, Rengstorff RH. Adaptation to hydrogel contact lenses: variations in myopia and corneal curvature measurements. J Am Optom Assoc 1977;48:363-6.
7. Rengstorff RH, Nilsson KT. Long-term effects of extended wear lenses: changes in refraction, corneal curvature, and visual acuity. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1985;62:66-8.
8. Andreo LK. Long-term effects of hydrophilic contact lenses on myopia. Ann Ophthalmol 1990;22:224-7, 9.
9. McGlone V, Farkas B. Spherical refractive changes (myopia creep) secondary to hydrogel lens wear in the adult population. Optom Vis Sci 1991;68(Suppl):73.
10. McGlone V, Farkas B. Refractive error changes in adult hydrogel contact lens wears: low vs. medium water content and daily vs. extended wear. Optom Vis Sci 1992;69(Suppl):24.
11. Pence NA. Effect of contact lenses on myopic progression in 24-39-year-olds. Optom Vis Sci 1992;69(Suppl):72.
12. Giles GH. The Principles and Practice of Refraction. Philadelphia: Chilton, 1960.
13. Thibos LN, Wheeler W, Horner D. Power vectors: an application of Fourier analysis to the description and statistical analysis of refractive error. Optom Vis Sci 1997;74:367-75.
14. Harris WF. Statistical inference on mean dioptric power: hypothesis testing and confidence regions. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1990;10: 363-72.
15. Harris WF. Testing hypotheses on dioptric power. Optom Vis Sci 1992;69:835-45.
16. Harris WF, Malan DJ, Rubin A. Ellipsoidal confidence regions for mean refractive status. Optom Vis Sci 1991;68:950-3.
17. Anderson TW. An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 1984:59, 156.
18. Grosvenor T. Etiology of astigmatism. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1978;55:214-8.
19. Hirsch MJ. Changes in astigmatism during the first eight years of school-an interim report from the Ojai longitudinal study. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1963;40:127-32.