The test of infant motor performance: Reliability in spinal muscular atrophy type i

Pediatric Physical Therapy

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 242-246

  Finkel, Richard S ^a,c,d   Hynan, Linda S ^b,e   Glanzman, Allan M ^b   Owens, Hollis ^b   Nelson, Leslie ^b   Cone, Stephanie R ^b   Campbell, Suzann K ^h   Iannaccone, Susan T ^f,g  

^a Division of Neurology   (Hong Kong)

^b Department of Physical Therapy ^*

^c CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA   (United States)

^d Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics

^e UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^g TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Human movement system; Infant; Reliability; Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type I; Test of Infant Motor Performance

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFANT; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MUSCLE HYPOTONIA; PHYSIOTHERAPIST; PRESCHOOL CHILD; SCORING SYSTEM; SPINAL MUSCULAR ATROPHY; SPINAL MUSCULAR ATROPHY TYPE 1; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; TRAINING; WEAKNESS; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; HEREDITARY SPINAL MUSCULAR ATROPHY; INSTRUMENTATION; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOTHERAPY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; VALIDATION STUDY; VIDEORECORDING;

CHILD DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; MALE; MOTOR SKILLS; OBSERVER VARIATION; PHYSICAL THERAPY (SPECIALTY); REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SPINAL MUSCULAR ATROPHIES OF CHILDHOOD; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 56149090248     PISSN: 08985669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PEP.0b013e318181ae96     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Emery AE. Population frequencies of inherited neuromuscular diseases - a world survey. Neuromuscul Disord. 1991;1:19-29.
2. Lefebvre S, Bü rglen L, Reboullet S, et al. Identification and characterization of a spinal muscular atrophy-determining gene. Cell. 1995;80: 155-165.
3. Wirth B, Brichta L, Schrank B, et al. Mildly affected patients with spinal muscular atrophy are partially protected by an increased SMN2 copy number. Hum Genet. 2006;119:422-428.
4. Swoboda KJ, Prior TW, Scott CB, et al. Natural history of denervation in SMA: relation to age, SMN2 copy number, and function. Ann Neurol. 2005;57:704-712.
5. Sumner CJ. Therapeutics development for spinal muscular atrophy. NeuroRx. 2006;3:235-245.
6. Russman BS, Iannaccone ST, Samaha FJ. A phase 1 trial of riluzole in spinal muscular atrophy. Arch Neurol. 2003;60:1601-1603.
7. Wang HY, Yang YH, Jong YJ. Evaluation of muscle strength in patients with spinal muscular atrophy. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2002;18: 241-247.
8. Merlini L, Mazzone ES, Solari A, et al. Reliability of hand-held dynamometry in spinal muscular atrophy. Muscle Nerve. 2002;26: 64-70.
9. Piper MC, Darrah J. Motor Assessment of the Developing Infant. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1994.
10. Bayley N. Manual for the Bayley Scales of Infant Development. 3rd ed. Australia: Psychological Corp; 1993.
11. Folio MR, Fewell RR. Peabody Developmental Motor Scales. 2nd ed. Texas: Pro-ed; 2000.
12. Campbell SK. The Test of Infant Motor Performance: test User's Manual, version 2.0: A Training Manual. Chicago, IL; 2005.
13. Campbell SK, Hedeker D. Validity of the Test of Infant Motor Performance for discriminating among infants with varying risk for poor motor outcome. J Pediatr. 2001;139:546-551.
14. Campbell SK, Levy P, Zawacki L, et al. Population-based age standards for interpreting results on the Test of Infant Motor Performance. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2006;18:119-125.
15. Campbell SK. Test-retest reliability of the Test of Infant Motor Performance. Pediatr Phys Ther, 1999;11:60-66.
16. Flegel J, Kolobe THA. Predictive validity of the test of infant motor performance as measured by the Bruininks-Oseretsky test of motor proficiency at school age. Phys Ther. 2002;82:762-771.
17. Iannaccone S, Hynan L, AmSMART Group. Challenges of enrollment for SMA type I clinical trials [abstract]. Neuromuscul Disord. 2007;17:780.
18. Liao PM CS, Girolami GL, et al. The Test of Infant Motor Performance: A Self-Study CD-ROM Program V3.0©2001. Available at: http://www.thetimp.com. Accessed August 20, 2007.
19. Oskoui M, Levy G, Garland CJ, et al. The changing natural history of spinal muscular atrophy Type 1. Neurology, 2007;69:1931-1936.
20. Bartko J. Measures of agreement: a single procedure. Stat Med. 1994; 13:737-745.
21. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159-174.
22. Hartman DP. Considerations in the choice in interobserver reliability estimates. J Appl Behav Anal. 1977;10:103-116.
23. Klinge L, Straub V, Neudorf U, et al. Enzyme replacement therapy in classical infantile Pompe disease: results of a ten-month follow-up study. Neuropediatrics. 2005;36:6-11.