Effects of microgrooves on the success rate and soft tissue adaptation of orthodontic miniscrews

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 78, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1057-1064

  Kim, Tae Woo ^a   Baek, Seung Hak ^a   Kim, Jong Wan ^b   Chang, Young Il ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University Bundang Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Bone remodeling; Histomorphometric analysis; Microgroove; Orthodontic load; Orthodontic miniscrew; Soft tissue adaptation

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; FLUORESCENT DYE;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; BONE REMODELING; BONE SCREW; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONNECTIVE TISSUE; DOG; EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; GINGIVA; IMAGE PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; JAW; MALE; MECHANICAL STRESS; ORTHODONTICS; PATHOLOGY; PERIODONTIUM; PHYSIOLOGY; PRESSURE; SURFACE PROPERTY; WOUND HEALING;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ALVEOLAR PROCESS; ANIMALS; BONE REMODELING; BONE SCREWS; CONNECTIVE TISSUE; DOGS; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; FEMALE; FLUORESCENT DYES; GINGIVA; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; ORTHODONTIC ANCHORAGE PROCEDURES; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE DESIGN; OSSEOINTEGRATION; PERIODONTIUM; PRESSURE; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 56049125337     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 00033219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2319/101707-496.1     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Kanomi R. Mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage. J Clin Orthod. 1997;31:763-767.
2. Umemori M, Sugawara J, Mitani H, Nagasaka H, Kawamura H. Skeletal anchorage system for open-bite correction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;115:166-174.
3. Park YC, Lee SY, Kim DH, Jee SH. Intrusion of posterior teeth using mini-screw implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;123:690-694.
4. Mah J, Bergstrand F. Temporary anchorage devices: a status report. J Clinic Orthod. 2005;39:132-136.
5. Chen F, Terada K, Handa K. Anchorage effect of various shape palatal osseointegrated implants: a finite element study. Angel Orthod. 2005;75:378-385.
6. Kim JW, Ahn SJ, Chang YI. Histomorphometric and mechanical analyses of the drill-free screw as orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;128:190-194.
7. Chen F, Terada K, Hanada K, Saito I. Anchorage effects of a palatal osseointegrated implant with different fixation: a finite element study. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:593-601.
8. Cochran D, Oates T, Morton D, Jones A, Buser D, Peters F. Clinical field trial examining an implant with a sand-blasted, acid-etched surface. J Periodontol. 2007;78:974-982.
9. Stem IB. Current concepts of the dentogingival junction: the epithelial and connective tissue attachments to the tooth. J Periodontol. 1981;52:465-476.
10. Berglundh T, Lindhe J, Ericsson I, Marinello CP, Liljenberg B, Thomsen P. The soft tissue barrier at implants and teeth. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1991;2:81-90.
11. Buser D, Weber HP, Donath K, Fiorellini JP, Paquette DW, Williams RC. Soft tissue reactions to non-submerged unloaded titanium implants in beagle dogs. J Periodontol. 1992;63:225-235.
12. Comut AA, Weber HP, Shortkroff S, Cui FZ, Spector M. Connective tissue orientation around dental implants in a canine model. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12:433-440.
13. Brunette DM, Kenner GS, Gould TR. Grooved titanium surfaces orient growth and migration of cells from human gingival explants. J Dent Res. 1983;62:1045-1048.
14. Schierano G, Ramieri G, Cortese M, Aimetti M, Preti G. Organization of the connective tissue barrier around long-term loaded implant abutments in man. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13:460-464.
15. Ruggeri A, Franchi M, Marini N, Trisi P, Piatelli A. Supracrestal circular collagen fiber network around osseointegrated nonsubmerged titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1992;3:169-175.
16. Piattelli A, Scarano A, Piattelli M, Bertolai R, Panzoni E. Histologic aspects of the bone and soft tissues surrounding three titanium non-submerged plasma-sprayed implants retrieved at autopsy: a case report. J Periodontol. 1997;68:694-700.
17. Glauser R, Schüpbach P, Gottlow J, Hämmerle CH. Periimplant soft tissue barrier at experimental one-piece mini-implants with different surface topography in humans: a light-microscopic overview and histometric analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005;7(suppl 1):S44-S51.
18. Chehroudi B, Gould TR, Brunette DM. Effects of a grooved titanium-coated implant surface on epithelial cell behavior in vitro and in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res. 1989;23:1067-1085.
19. Brunette DM. The effects of implant surface topography on the behavior of cells. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1988;3:231-246.
20. Meyle J, Wolburg H, von Recum AF. Surface micromorphology and cellular interactions. J Biomater Appl. 1993;7:362-374.
21. Clark P, Connolly P, Curtis AS, Dow JA, Wilkinson CD. Topographical control of cell behavior: II. Multiple grooved substrata. Development. 1990;108:635-644.
22. Picha GJ, Drake RF. Pillared-surface microstructure and soft-tissue implants: effect of implant site and fixation. J Biomed Mater Res. 1996;30:305-312.
23. Chehroudi B, Gould TR, Brunette DM. Titanium-coated micromachined grooves of different dimensions affect epithelial and connective-tissue cells differently in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res. 1990;24:1203-1219.
24. Chehroudi B, Gould TR, Brunette DM. The role of connective tissue in inhibiting epithelial downgrowth on titanium coated percutaneous implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 1992;26:493-515.
25. Motoyoshi M, Yano S, Tsuruoka T, Shimizu N. Biomechanical effect of abutment on stability of orthodontic mini-implant: a finite element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16:480-485.
26. Büchter A, Wiechmann D, Koerdt S, Wiesmann HP, Piffko J, Meyer U. Load-related implant reaction of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16:473-479.
27. Cattaneo PM, Dalstra M, Melsen B. Analysis of stress and strain around orthodontically loaded implants: an animal study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22:213-225.
28. Donath K, Breuner G. A method for the study of undecalcified bones and teeth with attached soft tissues: the Säg-Schliff (sawing and grinding) technique. J Oral Pathol. 1982;11:318-326.
29. Vidigal GM Jr, Aragones LC, Campos A Jr, Groisman M. Histomorphometric analyses of hydroxyapatite-coated and uncoated titanium dental implants in rabbit cortical bone. Implant Dent. 1999;8:295-302.
30. Mihalko WM, May TC, Kay JF, Krause WR. Finite element analysis of interface geometry effects on the crestal bone surrounding a dental implant. Implant Dent. 1992;1:212-217.
31. Meyer U, Vollmer D, Runte C, Bourauel C, Joos U. Bone loading pattern around implants in average and atrophic edentulous maxillae: a finite-element analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2001;29:100-105.
32. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg. 1981;10:387-416.
33. Rieger MR, Mayberry M, Brose MO. Finite element analysis of six endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;63:671-676.
34. Liou EJ, Pai BC, Lin JC. Do miniscrews remain stationary under orthodontic forces? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;126:42-47.
35. Ericsson I, Johansson CB, Bystedt H, Norton MR. A histomorphometric evaluation of bone-to-implant contact on machine-prepared and roughened titanium dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1994;5:202-206.