Analysis of stress and strain around orthodontically loaded implants: An animal study

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 213-225

  Cattaneo, Paolo M ^a   Dalstra, Michel ^a   Melsen, Birte ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Dental implants; Finite element analysis; Histomorphometry; Osseointegration

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE DENSITY; BONE REGENERATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL CARE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; IMPLANT; MACACA; MALE; MASTICATION; METHODOLOGY; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; OSTEOLYSIS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH SOCKET;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; BITE FORCE; BONE DENSITY; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; IMPLANTS, EXPERIMENTAL; MACACA FASCICULARIS; MALE; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES; OSSEOINTEGRATION; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TOOTH SOCKET;

EID: 34248340063     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Brånemark P-I, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindström J, Ohlsson A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1969;3(2): 81-100.
2. Albrektsson T, Lekholm U. Osseointegration: Current state of the art. Dent Clin North Am 1989;33:537-554.
3. Brunski JB. Biomechanical factors affecting the bone-dental implant interface.Clin Mater 1992;10:153-201.
4. Listgarten MA, Lang NP, Schroeder HE, Schroeder A. Periodontal tissues and their counterparts around endosseous implants [corrected and republished with original paging, article orginally printed in Clin Oral Implants Res 1991;2(1):1-19]. Clin Oral Implants Res 1991;2(3):1-19.
5. Brånemark P-I, Hansson BO, Adell R, et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scan J Plast Reconstr Surg 1977;16 (suppl):1-132.
6. Roberts WE, Helm FR, Marshall KJ, Gongloff RK. Rigid endosseous implants for orthodontic and orthopedic anchorage. Angle Orthod 1989;59:247-256.
7. Deguchi T, Takano-Yamamoto T, Kanomi R, Hartsfield JK Jr, Roberts WE, Garetto LP. The use of small titanium screws for orthodontic anchorage. J Dent Res 2003;82:377-381.
8. Garetto LP, Chen J, Parr JA, Roberts WE. Remodeling dynamics of bone supporting rigidly fixed titanium implants: A histomorphometric comparison in four species including humans. Implant Dent 1995;4:235-243.
9. Sennerby L, Thomsen P, Ericson LE. A morphometric and biomechanic comparison of titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical and cancellous bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:62-71.
10. Skripitz R, Aspenberg P.Tensile bond between bone and titanium - A reappraisal of osseointegration.Acta Orthop Scand 1998;69:315-319.
11. Roberts WE. Bone tissue interface. J Dent Educ 1988;52:804-809.
12. Frost HM.Tetracycline-based histological analysis of bone remodeling.Calcif Tissue Res 1969;3:211-237.
13. Parfitt AM, Drezner MK, Glorieux FH, et al. Bone histomorphometry: Standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units. Report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee. J Bone Miner Res 1987;2:595-610.
14. Roberts WE, Smith RK, Zilberman Y, Mozsary PG, Smith RS. Osseous adaptation to continuous loading of rigid endosseous implants. Am J Orthod 1984;86:95-111.
15. Jerome CP. Estimation of the bone mineral density variation associated with changes in turnover rate.Calcif Tissue Int 1989;44:406-410.
16. Parfitt AM. Osteonal and hemi-osteonal remodeling:The spatial and temporal framework for signal traffic in adult human bone. J Cell Biochem 1994;55:273-286.
17. Roberts WE, Marshall KJ, Mozsary PG. Rigid endosseous implant utilized as anchorage to protract molars and close an atrophic extraction site. Angle Orthod 1990;60:135-152.
18. Chen J, Chen K, Garetto LP, Roberts WE. Mechanical response to functional and therapeutic loading of a retromolar endosseous implant used for orthodontic anchorage to mesially translate mandibular molars. Implant Dent 1995;4:246-258.
19. Roberts WE. Bone physiology of tooth movement, ankylosis, and osseointegration. Semin Orthod 2000;6(3):173-182.
20. Huja SS, Katona TR, Burr DB, Garetto LP, Roberts WE. Microdamage adjacent to endosseous implants. Bone 1999;25:217-222.
21. Baiamonte T, Abbate MF, Pizzarello F, Lozada J, James R. The experimental verification of the efficacy of finite element modeling to dental implant systems. J Oral Implantol 1996;22:104-110.
22. Lozada JL, Abbate MF, Pizzarello FA, James RA. Comparative three-dimensional analysis of two finite-element endosseous implant designs. J Oral Implantol 1994;20:315-321.
23. Meyer U, Vollmer D, Runte C, Bourauel C, Joos U. Bone loading pattern around implants in average and atrophic edentulous maxillae: A finite-element analysis. J Maxillofac Surg 2001;29:100-105.
24. Cook SD, Klawitter JJ, Weinstein AM.The influence of implant geometry on the stress distribution around dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res 1982;16:369-379.
25. Rieger MR, Mayberry M, Brose MO. Finite element analysis of six endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1990:63:671-676.
26. Van Oosterwyck H, Duyck J, Vander SJ, et al.The influence of bone mechanical properties and implant fixation upon bone loading around oral implants.Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:407-418.
27. Chen J, Esterle M, Roberts WE. Mechanical response to functional loading around the threads of retromolar endosseous implants utilized for orthodontic anchorage: Coordinated histomorphometric and finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:282-289.
28. Meisen B, Diesen M, Oestergaard L, Agerbaek N, Lang K.The relationship between strain values and cellular reaction studied in trabecular bone by means of a finite element analysis. In: Davidovitch Z, Norton LA (eds). Biological Mechanics of Tooth Movements and Craniofacial Adaptation. Boston, MA: Harvard Society for the Advancement of Orthodontics, 1996:213-221.
29. Van Oosterwyck H, Vander Sloten J, Puers R, Naert I. Finite element studies on the role of mechanical loading in bone response around oral implants. Meccanica 2002;37:441-451.
30. Gundersen HJ, Bagger P, BendtsenTF, etal. Thenewstereological tools: Disector, fractionator, nucleator and point sampled intercepts and their use in pathological research and diagnosis. APMIS 1988;96:857-881.
31. Bonse U, Busch F, Günnewig O, et al. 3D computed X-ray tomography of human cancellous bone at 8 microns spatial and 10(-4) energy resolution. Bone Miner 1994;25:25-38.
32. Cattaneo PM, Dalstra M, Frich LH. A three-dimensional finite element model from computed tomography data: A semi-automated method. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 2001;215:203-213.
33. Hylander WL. Mandibular function in Galago crassicaudatus and Macaco fasdcularis: An in vivo approach to stress analysis of the mandible. J Morphol 1979;159:253-296.
34. Jerome CP, Peterson PE. Nonhuman primate models in skeletal research. Bone 2001;29:1-6.
35. Bouvier M, Hylander WL.The mechanical or metabolic function of secondary osteonal bone in the monkey Macaco fasdcularis. Arch Oral Biol 1996;41:941-950.
36. Barzilay I, Graser GN, Iranpour B, Natiella JR, Proskin HM. Immediate implantation of pure titanium implants into extraction sockets of Macaca fascicularis. Part II: Histologic observations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:489-497.
37. Barzilay I, Graser GN, Iranpour B, Proskin HM. Immediate implantation of pure titanium implants into extraction sockets of Macaco fascicularis. Part I: Clinical and radiographic assessment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:299-310.
38. Meisen B, Costa A. Immediate loading of implants used for orthodontic anchorage.Clin Orthod Res 2000;3:23-28.
39. Romanos G, Toh CG, Siar CH, et al. Peri-implant bone reactions to immediately loaded implants. An experimental study in monkeys. J Periodontol 2001;72:506-511.
40. Wadamoto M, Akagawa Y, Sato Y, Kubo T. The three-dimensional bone interface of an osseointegrated implant. I: A morphometric evaluation in initial healing. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:170-175.
41. Sahin S, Akagawa Y, Wadamoto M, Sato Y. The three-dimensional bone interface of an osseointegrated implant. II: A morphometric evaluation after three months of loading. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:176-180.
42. Carr AB, Gerard DA, Larsen PE.Quantitative histomorphometric description of implant anchorage for three types of dental implants following 3 months of healing in baboons. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:777-784.
43. Dagnaes-Hansen F. Laboratory animal genetics and genetic monitoring. In: Van Hoosier GL Jr, Hau J (eds). Handbook of Laboratory Animal Science, ed 2.Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2003:89-124.
44. Pilon JJ, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Maltha JC. Magnitude of orthodontic forces and rate of bodily tooth movement. An experimental study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;110:16-23.
45. Barbier L, Schepers E. Adaptive bone remodeling around oral implants under axial and nonaxial loading conditions in the dog mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:215-223.
46. Gotfredsen K, Rostrup E, Hjorting-Hansen E, Stoltze K, Budtz-Jorgensen E. Histological and histomorphometrical evaluation of tissue reactions adjacent to endosteal implants in monkeys. Clin Oral Implants Res 1991;2:30-37.
47. Müller R, Rüegsegger P. Micro-tomographic imaging for the nondestructive evaluation of trabecular bone architecture. Stud Health Technol Inform 1997;4061-4079.
48. Kiba H, Hayakawa T, Oba S, Kuwabara M, Habata I, Yamamoto H. Potential application of high-resolution microfocus x-ray techniques for observation of bone structure and bone-implant interface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:279-285.
49. Sennerby L, Wennerberg A, Pasop F.A new microtomographic technique for non-invasive evaluation of the bone structure around implants.Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:91-94.
50. Jung H, Kim HJ, Hong S, et al. Osseointegration assessment of dental implants using a synchrotron radiation imaging technique: A preliminary study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:121-126.
51. Yip G, Schneider P, Roberts EW. Micro-computed tomography: High resolution imaging of bone and implants in three dimensions. Semin Orthod 2004;10:174-187.
52. Bernhardt R, Scharnweber D, Muller B, et al.Comparison of microfocus- and synchrotron x-ray tomography for the analysis of osteointegration around Ti6Al4V implants. Eur Cell Mater 2004;742-751.
53. Sennerby L, Ericson LE, Thomsen P, Lekholm U, Astrand P. Structure of the bone-titanium interface in retrieved clinical oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1991;2:103-111.
54. Pierrisnard L, Hure G, Barquins M, Chappard D. Two dental implants designed for immediate loading: A finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:353-362.
55. Qin YX, McLeod KJ, Guilak F, Chiang FP, Rubin CT.Correlation of bony ingrowth to the distribution of stress and strain parameters surrounding a porous-coated implant.J Orthop Res 1996;14:862-870.
56. Frost HM. Skeletal structural adaptations to mechanical usage (SATMU): 1. Redefining Wolff's law:The bone modeling problem. Anat Rec 1990;226:403-413.
57. Frost HM.Wolff's Law and bone's structural adaptations to mechanical usage: An overview for clinicians. Angle Orthod 1994;64:175-188.
58. Frost HM. Some ABC's of skeletal pathophysiology.6. The growth/modeling/remodeling distinction. Calcif Tissue Int 1991;49:301-302.
59. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR.The longterm efficacy of currently used dental implants: A review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25.
60. Linder L, Albrektsson T, Brånemark P-I, et al. Electron microscopic analysis of the bone-titanium interface. Acta Orthop Scand 1983;54:45-52.
61. Frost HM. Skeletal structural adaptations to mechanical usage (SATMU): 2. Redefining Wolff's law:The remodeling problem. Anat Rec 1990;226:414-422.
62. Frost HM. Bone's mechanostat: A 2003 update. Anat Rec Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 2003;275A:1081-1101.
63. Lanyon LE, Rubin CT. Static vs dynamic loads as an influence on bone remodelling. J Biomech 1984;17:897-905.
64. Trisi P, Rebaudi A. Progressive bone adaptation of titanium implants during and after orthodontic load in humans. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002;22:31-43.
65. Verna C, Dalstra M, Lee TC, Cattaneo PM, Melsen B. Microcracks in the alveolar bone following orthodontic tooth movement: A morphological and morphometric study. Eur J Orthod 2004;26:459-467.
66. Marotti G, Favia A, Zallone AZ.Quantitative analysis on the rate of secondary bone mineralization. Calcif Tissue Res 1972;10:67-81.
67. Huja SS, Katona TR, Moore BK, Roberts WE. Microhardness and anisotropy of the vital osseous interface and endosseous implant supporting bone. J Orthop Res 1998;16:54-60.
68. Baumrind S. Taking stock: A critical perspective on contemporary orthodontics. Orthod Craniofac Res 2004;7:150-156.