Correcting social ills through mandatory research participation

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 8, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 39-40

  Ho, Anita ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ETHICS; HEALTH CARE DISPARITY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MINORITY GROUP; MORALITY; NOTE; POLICY; RESEARCH SUBJECT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIAL PROBLEM; STANDARD; UNITED STATES;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; HEALTHCARE DISPARITIES; HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; HUMANS; MINORITY GROUPS; MORAL OBLIGATIONS; PUBLIC POLICY; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIAL PROBLEMS; SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY; THERAPEUTIC HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; UNITED STATES;

EID: 56049098166     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265160802478545     Document Type: Note

References (7)

1. de Melo-Martin, I. 2008. A Duty to Participate in Research: Does social context matter? American Journal of Bioethics 8(10): 28-36.
2. Fisher, J. 2006. Procedural misconceptions and informed consent: Insights from empirical research on the clinical trials industry. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 16: 251-268.
3. Institute of Medicine. 2003. Unequal treatment: Confronting racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
4. Kass, N., Sugarman, J., Faden, R., et al. 1996. Trust: The fragile foundation of contemporary biomedical research. Hastings Center Report 26: 25-29.
5. London, A. 2005. Does research ethics rest on a mistake? The common good, reasonable risk and social justice. American Journal of Bioethics 5(1): 37-39.
6. Morreim, H. 2005. Research versus innovation: Real differences. American Journal of Bioethics 5(1): 42-43.
7. Rhodes, R. 2005. Rethinking research ethics. American Journal of Bioethics 5(1): 7-28.