메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 42-43

Research versus innovation: Real differences

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL TRIAL; DECISION MAKING; ETHICS; EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY; HEART ASSIST DEVICE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMED CONSENT; MENTAL CAPACITY; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; PATIENT SELECTION; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; RESEARCH ETHICS; RESEARCH SUBJECT; RISK ASSESSMENT; VULNERABLE POPULATION;

EID: 26944493436     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265160590931205     Document Type: Note
Times cited : (9)

References (4)
  • 1
    • 5044237159 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Litigation in clinical research: Malpractice doctrines versus research realities
    • Morreim, E. H. 2004. Litigation in clinical research: Malpractice doctrines versus research realities. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 32(3): 474-484.
    • (2004) Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics , vol.32 , Issue.3 , pp. 474-484
    • Morreim, E.H.1
  • 2
    • 27944452720 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • End-stage heart disease, high-risk research, and competence to consent: The case of the AbioCor artificial heart
    • _. 2005. End-stage heart disease, high-risk research, and competence to consent: The case of the AbioCor artificial heart. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine.
    • (2005) Perspectives in Biology and Medicine
  • 3
    • 27944440137 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Prince v. Massachusetts. 1944. 321 U.S. 158, 170
    • Prince v. Massachusetts. 1944. 321 U.S. 158, 170.


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.