Justice Delayed or Justice Denied? A Contemporary Review of Capital Habeas Corpus

Justice System Journal

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 273-287

  Gould, Jon B ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 56049093243     PISSN: 0098261X     EISSN: 23277556     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0098261X.2008.10767893     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Ad Hoc Committee on Federal Habeas Corpus in Capital Cases, Judicial Conference of the United States (1989). Committee report and proposal.
2. Alarcon, A. (2007). “Remedies for California’s Death Row Deadlock,” 80 Southern California Law Review 697.
3. Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, 28 U.S.C. §2241-2266 (1996).
4. Bright, s. (2004). Interview with PBS Frontline. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/plea/interviews/bright.html (last accessed March 10, 2008)
5. Church, T. W., Jr. (1985). “Examining Local Legal Culture,” 10 Law and Social Inquiry 449.
6. CNN (2006). “Victim’s Family ‘Devastated’ by Execution Delay.” http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/02/22/morales.execution/index.html (last accessed March 11, 2008)
7. Congressional Research Service (2005). Review of S1088. http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:SN01088:@@@D&summ2=m& (last accessed March 7, 2008).
8. Coyle, M. (2005). “Congress Moves to Limit Prisoner Habeas,” National Law Journal, November 23. http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1132580126812 (last accessed March 7, 2008)
9. Death Penalty Information Center (2008). “Facts About the Death Penalty.” http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/FactSheet.pdf (last accessed March 9, 2008)
10. Freedman, E. M. (2006). “Giarranto is a Scarecrow: The Right to Counsel in State Capital Postconviction Proceedings,” 91 Cornell Law Review 1079.
11. Gallas, G. (2005). “Local Legal Culture: More Than Court Culture,” 20 Court Manager 23.
12. Hanson, R. A., and H. W. K. Daley (1995). Federal Habeas Corpus Review: Challenging State Court Criminal Convictions. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
13. King, N. J., F. L. Cheesman II, and B. J. Ostrom (2007). Habeas Litigation in the U.S. District Courts: An Empirical Study of Habeas Corpus Cases Filed by State Prisoners Under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Law School.
14. Office of the Attorney General, Department of Justice (2007). “Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: Certification Process for State Capital Counsel Systems,” Federal Register 72(108): 31217–220.
15. Ostrom, B. J., C. W. Ostrom, R. A. Hanson, and M. Kleiman (2007). Trial Courts as Organizations. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
16. Proceedings of the Judicial Conference of the United States (2007). Minutes, March 13. http://www.uscourts.gov/judconf/07MarchProceedings.pdf (last accessed March 10, 2008)
17. Wasby, S. L. (2007). “Of Note.” Review of Gallas, “Local Legal Culture,” 21 Justice System Journal 131.