Cephalometric superimpositions: A comparison of anatomical and metallic implant methods

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 78, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 967-976

  Gu, Yan ^a   McNamara Jr , James A ^b,c,d,e  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY SCHOOL AND HOSPITAL OF STOMATOLOGY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^e NONE

Author keywords

Cephalometrics; Cervical vertebral maturation method; Mandible; Maxilla; Metallic implants; Superimposition

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; TANTALUM;

AGE DETERMINATION; ARTICLE; BONE DEVELOPMENT; BONE REMODELING; CEPHALOMETRY; CERVICAL SPINE; CHILD; CHIN; FACIAL BONE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; MANDIBLE; MANDIBLE CONDYLE; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; NASAL BONE; PALATE; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES; SKULL;

AGE DETERMINATION BY SKELETON; BONE DEVELOPMENT; BONE REMODELING; CEPHALOMETRY; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; CHILD; CHIN; DENTAL MATERIALS; FACIAL BONES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MANDIBLE; MANDIBULAR CONDYLE; MAXILLA; NASAL BONE; PALATE; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; SKULL; TANTALUM;

EID: 56049087580     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 00033219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2319/070107-301.1     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Sarnat BG. Growth pattern of the mandible: some reflections. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1986;90:221-233.
2. Björk A. Facial growth in man, studied with the aid of metallic implants. Acta Odontol Scand. 1955;13:9-34.
3. Björk A. Variations in the growth pattern of the human mandible: longitudinal radiographic study by the implant method. J Dent Res. 1963;42:400-411.
4. Björk A. Sutural growth of the upper face studied by the implant method. Acta Odontol Scand. 1966;24:109-129.
5. Björk A. The use of metallic implants in the study of facial growth in children: method and application. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1968;29:243-254.
6. Björk A, Skieller V. Facial development and tooth eruption. An implant study at the age of puberty. Am J Orthod. 1972;62:339-383.
7. Björk A, Skieller V. Postnatal growth and development of the maxillary complex. In: McNamara JA Jr, ed. Factors Affecting the Growth of the Midface. Ann Arbor, Mich: Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan; 1976:61-69.
8. Krebs A. Midpalatal suture expansion studies by the implant method over a seven-year period. Trans Europ Orthod Soc. 1964;40:131-142.
9. Ødegaard J. Growth of the mandible studied with the aid of metal implant. Am J Orthod. 1970;57:145-157.
10. Ødegaard J. Mandibular rotation studies with the aid of metal implants. Am J Orthod. 1970;58:448-454.
11. Lavergne J, Gasson N. A metal implant study of mandibular rotation. Angle Orthod. 1976;46:144-150.
12. Breiden CM, Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, Kulbersh R. Maxillary skeletal and dental change with Fränkel appliance therapy - an implant study. Angle Orthod. 1984;54:232-266.
13. Salzmann JA. The research workshop on cephalometrics. Am J Orthod. 1960;46:834-847.
14. Ricketts RM. A four-step method to distinguish orthodontic changes from natural growth. J Clin Orthod. 1975;9:208-215, 218-228.
15. Ricketts RM. Perspectives in the clinical application of cephalometrics. The first fifty years. Angle Orthod. 1981;51:115-150.
16. McNamara JA Jr. Influence of respiratory pattern on craniofacial growth. Angle Orthod. 1981;51:269-300.
17. Nielsen IL. Maxillary superimposition: a comparison of three methods for cephalometric evaluation of growth and treatment change. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;95:422-431.
18. Doppel DM, Damon WM, Joondeph DR, Little RM. An investigation of maxillary superimposition techniques using metallic implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994;105:161-168.
19. Springate SD, Jones AG. The validity of two methods of mandibular superimpositions: a comparison with metallic implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;113:263-270.
20. American Board of Orthodontics. Case report preparation: composite tracings. St Louis, Mo: 2007. Available at: http://www.americanboardortho.com/ professionals/clinicalexam/casereportpresentation/preparation/tracings.aspx#. Accessed April 20, 2007.
21. Björk A. Prediction of mandibular growth rotation. Am J Orthod. 1969;55:585-599.
22. Franchi L, Baccetti T. New emphasis on the role of mandibular skeletal maturity in dentofacial orthopedics. In: McNamara JA Jr, ed. The Enigma of the Vertical Dimension. Ann Arbor, Mich: Monograph 36, Craniofacial Growth Series, Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan; 2000:237-251.
23. Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. The Cervical Vertebral Maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Semin Orthod. 2005;11:119-129.
24. Mathews JR, Ware WH. Longitudinal mandibular growth in children with tantalum implants. Am J Orthod. 1978;74:633-655.
25. Mathews JR, Payne GS. Quantitative computerized analysis of lower incisor changes: a longitudinal implant study in man. Angle Orthod. 1980;50:218-229.
26. Steiner CC. Cephalometrics for you and me. Am J Orthod. 1953;39:729-755.
27. Ricketts RM. The influence of orthodontic treatment on facial growth and development. Angle Orthod. 1960;30:103-133.
28. McNamara JA Jr. A method of cephalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod. 1984;86:449-469.
29. McNamara JA Jr, Graber LW. Mandibular growth in the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). Am J Phys Anthropol. 1975;42:15-24.
30. Enlow DH. The Human Face. New York, NY: Harper and Row; 1968:232.
31. Isaacson RJ, Worms FW, Speidel TM. Measurement of tooth movement. Am J Orthod. 1976;70:290-303.
32. Björk A, Skieller V. Growth of the maxilla in three dimensions as revealed radiographically by the implant method. Br J Orthod. 1977;4:53-64.
33. Baumrind S, Korn EL, Ben-Bassat Y, West EE. Quantitation of maxillary remodeling. 1. A description of osseous changes relative to superimposition on metallic implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987;91:29-41.
34. Baumrind S, Korn EL, Ben-Bassat Y, West EE. Quantitation of maxillary remodeling. 2. Masking of remodeling effects when an "anatomical" method of superimposition is used in the absence of metallic implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987;91:463-474.