The validity of two methods of mandibular superimposition: a comparison with tantalum implants.

American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics

Volumn 113, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 263-270

  Springate, S D ^a   Jones, A G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TANTALUM;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CHIN; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; INCISOR; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE; MANDIBLE CONDYLE; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORTHODONTICS; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; ROTATION; TOOTH OCCLUSION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CHIN; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCISOR; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; MANDIBLE; MANDIBULAR CONDYLE; MOLAR; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROTATION; TANTALUM; VERTICAL DIMENSION;

EID: 0032012884     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70295-1     Document Type: Article

References (0)