Acute toxicity estimation by calculation - Tubifex assay and quantitative structure-activity relationships

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Volumn 27, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 2281-2286

  Tichý, Miloň ^a   Rucki, Marián ^a   Hanzlíková, Iveta ^a   Roth, Zdeněk ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Acute toxicity; Quantitative activity activity relationships; Quantitative structure activity relationship; Tubifex tubifex

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOLS; ALDEHYDES; ANILINE; BIOCHEMISTRY; BIODIVERSITY; CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS; CHEMICAL STABILITY; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); DYES; ESTERS; MOLECULAR GRAPHICS; OCEAN HABITATS; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; PHENOLS; POTASSIUM COMPOUNDS; SULFUR COMPOUNDS; TOXIC MATERIALS; TOXICITY;

ACUTE TOXICITIES; ACUTE TOXICITY; ALKANOLS; ALKENOLS; ALKYNOLS; CHEMICAL STRUCTURES; CHLORINATED PHENOLS; CROSS VALIDATIONS; MEDIAN EFFECTIVE CONCENTRATIONS; OLIGOCHAETA; PREDICTIVE ABILITIES; QSAR MODELS; QUANTITATIVE ACTIVITY-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIPS; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURES; STANDARD DEVIATIONS; TUBIFEX TUBIFEX; TUBIFEX TUBIFEXES; UNSATURATED ALDEHYDES;

ORGANIC CHEMICALS;

ALDEHYDE DERIVATIVE; ALKANOL; ANILINE DERIVATIVE; ESTER; PHENOL DERIVATIVE;

ANNELID; BIOASSAY; INHIBITION; MODEL VALIDATION; MOVEMENT; PHENOL; POLLUTION EXPOSURE; TOXICITY TEST;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; TOXICITY TESTING; TUBIFEX TUBIFEX; VALIDATION PROCESS; WORM;

ACUTE TOXICITY TESTS; ANIMALS; OLIGOCHAETA; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

TUBIFEX; TUBIFEX TUBIFEX;

EID: 56049086608     PISSN: 07307268     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1897/08-037.1     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Jaworska JS, Comber M, Auer C, van Leeuwen CJ. 2003. Summary of a workshop on regulatory acceptance of (Q)SARs for human health and environmental endpoints. Environ Health Perspect 111:1358-1360.
2. Eriksson L, Jaworska J, Worth AP, Cronin MTD, McDowel RM, Gramatica P. 2003. Methods for reliability and uncertainty assessment and for applicability evaluations of classification- and regression-based QSARs. Environ Health Perspect 111:1361-1375.
3. Cronin MTD, Walker JD, Jaworska JS, Comber MHI, Watts CD, Worth AP. 2003. Use of QSARs in international decision-making frameworks to predict ecologic effects and environmental fate of chemical substances. Environ Health Perspect 111:1376-1390.
4. Cronin MTD, Jaworska JS, Walker JD, Comber MHI, Watts CD, Worth AP. 2003. Use of QSARs in international decision-making frameworks to predict health effects of chemical substances. Environ Health Perspect 111:1391-1401.
5. Schultz TW, Holcombe GW, Phipps GL. 1986. Relationships of quantitative structure-activity to comparative toxicity of selected phenols in the Pimephales promelas and Tetrahymena pyriformis test systems. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 12:146-153.
6. Schultz TW, Arnold LM, Wilke TS, Moulton MP. 1990. Relationships of quantitative structure-activity for normal aliphatic alcohols. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 19:247-253.
7. Lipnick RL. 1985. Validation and extension of fish toxicity QSARs and interspecies comparisons for certain classes of organic chemicals. In Tichy M, ed, QSAR in Toxicology and Xenobiochemistry, Vol 8 - Pharmacochemistry Library. Elsevier, New York, NY, USA, pp 39-52.
8. Bearden AP, Schultz TW. 1997. Structure-activity relationships for Pimephales and Tetrahymena: A mechanism of action approach. Environ Toxicol Chem 16:1311-1317.
9. Bearden AP, Schultz TW. 1998. Comparison of Tetrahymena and Pimephales toxicity based on mechanism of action. SAR QSAR Environ Res 9:127-153.
10. Kaiser KLE. 1993. Qualitative and quantitative relationships of Microtox data with toxicity data for other aquatic species. In Richardson M, ed, Ecotoxicology Monitoring. Verlag Chemie Verlagsgesellschaft, Weinheim, Germany, pp 197-211.
11. Cronin MTD, Dearden JC, Dobbs AJ. 1991. QSAR studies of comparative toxicity in aquatic organisms. Sci Total Environ 109/110:431-439.
12. Kaiser KLE, Niculescu SP, Schüürmann G. 1997. Feed forward backpropagation neural networks and their use in predicting the acute toxicity of chemicals to the fathead minnow. Water Qual Res J Can 32:637-657.
13. Vaal M, van der Wal JT, Hermens J, Hoekstra J. 1997. Pattern analysis of the variation in the sensitivity of aquatic species to toxicants. Chemosphere 35:1291-1309.
14. Dimitrov SD, Mekenyan OG, Schultz TW. 2000. Interspecies modeling of narcotics toxicity to aquatic animals. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 65:399-406.
15. Tichý M, Rucki M, Hanzlíková I, Roth Z. 2007. The Tubifex tubifex assay for the determination of acute toxicity. Altern Lab Anim 35:229-237.
16. Origin Lab. 2003. Origin/OriginPro 7.5 SR0. Northampton, MA, USA.
17. Verhaar HJM, van Leeuwen CJ, Hermens JLM. 1992. Classifying environmental pollutants. 1: Structure-activity relationships for prediction of aquatic toxicity. Chemosphere 25:471-491.
18. Hansch C, Kim D, Leo AJ, Novellino E, Silipo C, Vittoria A. 1989. Toward a quantitative comparative toxicology of organic compounds. Crit Rev Toxicol 19:185-226.
19. Schultz TW, Wyatt NL, Lin DT. 1990. Structure-toxicity relationships for nonpolar narcotics: A comparison of data from the Tetrahymena, Photobacterium and Pimephales systems. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 44:67-72.
20. Hansch C, Dunn WJ. 1972. Linear relationships between lipophilic character and biological activity of drugs. J Pharm Sci 61:1-19.
21. Veith GD, Lipnick RL, Russom CL. 1989. The toxicity of acetylenic alcohols to the fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas: Narcosis and proelectrophile activation. Xenobiotica 19:555-565.
22. Lipnick RL, Johnson DE, Gilford JH, Bickings CK, Newsome LD. 1985. Comparison of fish toxicity screening data for 55 alcohols with the quantitative structure-activity relationship predictions of minimum toxicity for nonreactive nonelectrolyte organic compounds. Environ Toxicol Chem 4:281-296.
23. Wold S. 1991. Validation of QSARs. Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships 10:191-193.
24. Tichy M, Rucki M, Hanzlíková I, Čihák R, Dynterová A, Feltl L, Roth Z. 2005. Validation of alternative method for hazard estimation of chemicals and their mixtures. České Pracovní Lékařství 6:137-146 (in Czech).
25. Russom CL, Bradbury SP, Broderius SJ, Hammermeister DE, Drummond RA. 1997. Predicting modes of toxic action from chemical structure: Acute toxicity in the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas). Environ Toxicol Chem 16:948-967.
26. Seward JR, Hamblen EL, Schultz TW. 2002. Regression comparisons of Tetrahymena pyriformis and Poecilia reticulata toxicity. Chemosphere 47:93-101.
27. Bringmann G, Kuhn R. 1977. Befunde der Schadwirkung wassergefahrdender Stoffe gegen Daphnia magna. Wasser und Abwasser-Forschung 10:161-166.
28. Guilhermino L, Diamantino T, Silva MC, Soares AMVM. 2000. Acute toxicity test with Daphnia magna: An alternative to mammals in the prescreening of chemical toxicity. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 46:357-362.
29. Hansch C, Leo A, Hoekman D. 1995. Exploring QSAR. Hydrophobic, Electronic and Steric Constants. ACS Professional Reference Book. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC.