Intercandidate agenda-setting in presidential elections: Issue and attribute agendas in the 2004 campaign

Public Relations Review

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 325-330

  Kiousis, Spiro ^a   Shields, Arlana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Agenda building; Attribute salience; Framing; Information subsidies; Intercandidate agenda setting; Issue salience; Political public relations

Indexed keywords

EID: 56049084651     PISSN: 03638111     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2008.07.004     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Benoit W., and Airne D. Issue ownership for non-presidential television spots. Communication Quarterly 53 4 (2005) 493-503
2. Berger B.K. Private issues and public policy: Locating the corporate agenda in agenda-setting theory. Journal of Public Relations Research 13 2 (2001) 91-126
3. Boyle T.P. Intermedia agenda setting in the 1996 presidential election. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 78 1 (2001) 26-44
4. Cameron G.T., Sallot L.M., and Curtin P.A. Public relations and the production of news: A critical review and a theoretical framework. In: Burleson B.R. (Ed). Communication yearbook 20 (1997), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 111-155
5. Davis A. Public relations, news production and changing patterns of source access in the British national media. Media, Culture, & Society 22 1 (2000) 39-59
6. de Vreese C.H. Framing Europe: Television news and European integration (2003), Askant Academic Publishers, Amsterdam
7. Entman R. Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 43 4 (1993) 51-58
8. Evatt D.S., and Bell T. The political dance: A test of agenda-setting effects in the 1994 Texas gubernatorial election. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication. Washington, DC (August 1995)
9. Gandy O.H. Beyond agenda setting: Information subsidies and public policy (1982), Norwood, NJ: Ablex
10. Golan G., and Wanta W. Second-level agenda setting in the New Hampshire primary: A comparison of coverage in three newspapers and public perceptions of candidates. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 78 2 (2001) 247-259
11. Hallahan K. Seven models of framing: Implications for public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research 11 3 (1999) 205-242
12. Harris P., Fury D., and Lock A. Do political parties and the press influence the public agenda? A content analysis of press coverage of the 2001 UK general election. Journal of Political Marketing 5 3 (2006) 1-28
13. Hon L.C. Demonstrating effectiveness in public relations: Goals, objectives and evaluation. Journal of Public Relations Research 10 2 (1998) 103-135
14. Iyengar S. Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues (1991), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
15. Kaid L.L. Newspaper treatment of a candidate's news releases. Journalism Quarterly 53 1 (1976) 135-157
16. Kim Y. Measuring the economic value of public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research 13 1 (2001) 3-26
17. Kiousis S. Explicating media salience: A factor analysis of New York Times issue coverage during the 2000 presidential election. Journal of Communication 54 1 (2004) 71-88
18. Kiousis S. Compelling arguments and attitude strength: Exploring the impact of second-level agenda-setting on public opinion of presidential candidate images. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 10 2 (2005) 3-27
19. Knight M.G. Getting past the impasse: Framing as a tool for public relations. Public Relations Review 25 3 (1999) 381-398
20. Lancendorfer K.M., and Lee B. Agenda building and the media: A content analysis of the relationships between the media in the 2002 Michigan Governor's race. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication. Kansas City, MO (August 2003)
21. Lopez-Escobar E., Llamas J.P., and McCombs M.E. Agenda setting and community consensus: First and second level effects. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 10 4 (1998) 335-348
22. McCombs M.E. Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion (2004), Polity Press, Malden, MA
23. McCombs M.E., and Evatt D. Los temas y los aspectos: Explorando una nueva dimension de la agenda setting [Objects and Attributes: Exploring a New Dimension of Agenda Setting.]. Comunicacion y Sociedad 8 1 (1995) 7-32
24. McKinnon L.M., Tedesco J.C., and Lauder T. Political power through public relations. In: Heath R.L., and Vasquez G.M. (Eds). Handbook of public relations (2001), Sage, Boston, MA 557-564
25. McNair B. An introduction to political communication. 3rd ed. (2003), Routledge, London
26. Miller, M., Andsager, J., & Riechert, B. (1998). Framing the candidates in presidential primaries: Issues and images in press releases and news coverage. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 75(2), 312-324.
27. Riffe D., Lacy S., and Fico F. Analyzing media messages (1998), Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey
28. Roper J. Organizational identities, identification, and positioning: learning from political fields. Public Relations Review 31 1 (2005) 138-139
29. Semetko H., and Valkenburg P.M. Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication 50 2 (2000) 93-109
30. Shin J., and Cameron G.T. The interplay of professional and cultural factors in the online source-reporter relationship. Journalism Studies 4 2 (2003) 253-272
31. Spaeth M. Presidential politics and public relations in 2004. Journalism Studies 6 2 (2004) 237-240
32. Tedesco J.C. Issue and strategy agenda-setting in the 2000 presidential primaries. American Behavioral Scientist 44 12 (2001) 2048-2067
33. Tedesco J.C. Intercandidate agenda setting in the 2004 presidential primary. American Behavioral Scientist 49 1 (2005) 92-113
34. Tedesco J.C. Issue and strategy agenda setting in the 2004 presidential election: Exploring the candidate-journalist relationship. Journalism Studies 6 2 (2005) 187-201