Role of plant enemies in the forestry of indigenous vs. nonindigenous pines

Ecological Applications

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 1171-1181

  Lombardero, María J ^a   Vázquez Mejuto, Patricia ^a   Ayres, Matthew P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA   (Spain)

^b Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory   (United States)

Author keywords

Antations; Enemy release hypothesis; Exotic plants; Forestry; Herbivory; Host choice; Invasions; Pathogen; Pinus pinaster; Pinus radiata; Silviculture; Tomicus piniperda

Indexed keywords

BEETLE; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; CONIFEROUS TREE; ENEMY RELEASE HYPOTHESIS; FORESTRY; FUNGUS; HERBIVORY; HOST PREFERENCE; INTRODUCED SPECIES; NATIVE SPECIES; PEST OUTBREAK; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PLANTATION; SILVICULTURE; WOUNDING;

EURASIA; EUROPE; GALICIA [SPAIN]; SOUTHERN EUROPE; SPAIN;

COLEOPTERA; PINUS PINASTER; PINUS RADIATA; SCOLYTINAE; SPHAEROPSIS SAPINEA; TOMICUS PINIPERDA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ASCOMYCETES; INSECT; MICROBIOLOGY; PARASITOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PINE;

ANIMALS; ASCOMYCOTA; INSECTS; PINUS;

EID: 55949134580     PISSN: 10510761     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/07-1048.1     Document Type: Article

References (106)

1. Abbott, I. 1993, Review of the ecology and control of the introduced bark beetle Ips grandicollis (Eichhoff) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in Western Australia, 1952-1990. CALM-Science 1:35-46.
2. Agrawal, A. A., P. M. Kotanen, C. E. Mitchell, A. G. Power, W. Godsoe, and J. Klironomos. 2005. Enemy release? An experiment with congeneric plant pairs and diverse above- and belowground enemies. Ecology 86:2979-2989.
3. Almquist, A. C., J. Faldt, A. Yart, Y. Chevet, D. Sauvard, F. Lieutier, and A. K. Borg-Karlson. 2006, Selection in Tomicus piniperda L.: composition of monoterpene hydrocarbons in relation to attack frequency in the shoot feeding phase. Zeitschrift fü r Naturforschung C 61:439-444.
4. Alvarez, P. 2004. Viveros forestales y uso de planta en repoblación en Galicia. Universidad de Santiago, Santiago, Spain.
5. Amezaga, I. 1996. Monterrey pine (Pinus radiata D. Don) suitability for the pine shoot beetle (Tomicus piniperda L.) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Forest Ecology and Management 86:73-79.
6. Amezaga, I. 1997. Forest characteristics affecting the rate of shoot pruning by the pine shoot beetle (Tomicus piniperda L.) in Pinus radiata D. Don and P. sylvestris L. plantations. Forestry 70:129-137.
7. Bakke, A. 1968. Ecological studies on bark beetles (Coleoptcra: Scolytidae) associated with Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in Norway with particular reference to influence of temperature. Meddelelser fra det Norske Skogforsoksvesen 21:447-602.
8. Bega, R. V., R. S. Smith, A. P. Martinez, and C. J. Davis. 1978. Severe damage to Pinus radiata and P. pinaster by Diplodia pinea and Lophodermium sp. on Malokai and Lanai in Hawaii. Plant Disease Repoter 62:329-331.
9. Blaney, C. S., and P. M. Kotanen, 2001. Effects of fungal pathogens on seeds of native and exotic plants: a test using congeneric pairs. Journal of Applied Ecology 38:1104-1113.
10. Blossey, B., and R. Nö tzold. 1995. Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants: a hypothesis. Journal of Ecology 83:887-889.
11. Blumenthal, D. M., and R. A. Hufbauer. 2007. Increased plant size in exotic populations: a common-garden test with 14 invasive species. Ecology 88:2758-2765.
12. Borkowski, A. 2001. Threats to pine stands by the pine shoot beetles Tomkus piniperda (L.) and T. minor (Hart.) around a sawmill in southern Poland, Journal of Applied Entomology 125:489-92.
13. Boyle, J. R., J. K. Winjum, K. Kavanagh, and E. C. Jensen, editors. 1999. Planted forests: contributions to the quest for sustainable societies. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
14. Brockerhoff, E. G., A. M. Liebhold, and H. Jactel. 2006. The ecology of forest insect invasions and advances in their management. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36:263-268.
15. Browne, F. G. 1968. Pest and diseases of forest plantation trees: an annoted list of the principal species occurring in the British Commonwealth. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
16. Burgess, T. I., and M.J. Wingfield. 2001. Exotic pine forestry in the Southern Hemisphere: a brief history of establishment and quarantine practices. South African Forestry Journal 192:79-83.
17. Cappuccino, N., and D. Carpenter. 2005. Invasive exotic plants suffer less herbivory than non-invasive exotic plants. Biology Letters 1:435-438.
18. Carpenter, D., and N. Cappuccino. 2005. Herbivory, time since introduction and the invasiveness of exotic plants. Journal of Ecology 93:315-321.
19. Chapin, F. S., III, et al. 2000. Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature 405:234-242.
20. Chararas, C. 1968. Adaptation faculty of Blastophagus piniperda L (Col., Scolytidae) on various Pinus and preference of this insect with regard to these essences. Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Seances de l'Académie des Sciences Serie D 266:238-241.
21. Colautti, R. I., A. Ricciardi, I. A. Grigorovich, and H. J. Maclsaac. 2004. Is invasion success explained by the enemy release hypothesis? Ecology Letters 7:721-733.
22. Cool, L. G., and E. Zavarin. 1992. Terpene variability of mainland Pinus radiata. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 20:133-144.
23. Cordero. A., and S. Satolamazza. 2000. The effect of three species of Eucalyptus on growth and fecundity of the Eucalyptus snout beetle (Gonipterus scutellatus). Forestry 73:21-29.
24. Crawley, M. J. 1997. Plant ecology. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, UK.
25. Cripps, M. G., M. Schwarzlander, J. L. Mckenney, H. L. Hinz, and W. J. Price. 2006. Biogeographical comparison of the arthropod herbivore communities associated with Lepidium draba in its native, expanded and introduced ranges. Journal of Biogeography 33:2107-2119.
26. Czokajlo, D., R. A. Wink, J. C. Warren, and S. A. Teale. 1997. Growth reduction of Scots pine, Pinus sylvestris, caused by the larger pine shoot beetle. Tomicus piniperda (Coleoptcra, Scolytidae), in New York State. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 27:1394-1397.
27. Darwin, C. 1859. On the origin of species by means of natural selection, on the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. John Murray, London, UK.
28. DeWalt, S. J., J. S. Denslow, and K. Ickes. 2004. Naturalenemy release facilitates habitat expansion of the invasive tropical shrub Clidemia hirta. Ecology 85:471-483.
29. De Wet, J., M. J. Wingfield, T. A. Coutinho, and B. D. Wingfield. 2000. Characterization of Sphaeropsis sapinea isolates from South Africa. Mexico, and Indonesia. Plant Disease 84:151-156.
30. Eldridge, K. G. 1961. Refreshing the genetic resource of Pinus radiata. Appita 32:93-97.
31. Elton, C. S. 1958. The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Methuen, London, UK.
32. Epstein, M. J., and J. Molofsky. 2007. Invasiveness in plant communities with feedbacks, Ecology Letters 10:253-263.
33. Erbilgin. N., S. R. Mori, J. H. Sun, J. D. Stein, D. R. Owen, L. D. Merrill, R. C. Bolanos, K. F. Raffa, T. M. Montiel, D. L. Wood, and N. E. Gillette. 2007. Response to host volatiles by native and introduced populations of Dendroctonus Valens (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Scolytinae) in North America and China, Journal of Chemical Ecology 33:131-146.
34. Faccoli, M. 2006. Morphological separation of Tomicus piniperda and T. destruens (Colcoptcra: Curculionidac: Scolytinae): new and old characters. European Journal of Entomology 103:433-442.
35. Feci, E., A. Battisti, P. Capretti, and S. Tegli. 2002. An association between the fungus Sphaeropsis sapinea and the cone bug Gastrodes grossipes in cones of Pinus nigra in Italy. Forest Pathology 32:241-247.
36. Gadgill, P. D., and J. Bain. 1999. Vulnerability of planted forests to biotic and abiotic disturbances. New Forests 17:227-238.
37. Gallego, D., F. Cánovas, M. A. Esteve, and J. Galián. 2004. Descriptive biogeography of Tomicus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) species in Spain. Journal of Biogeography 31:2011-2024.
38. Gallego. D., and J. Galián. 2001. The internal transcribed spacers (ITS 1 and ITS2) of the rDNA differentiates the bark beetle forest pests Tomicus destruens and Tomicus piniperda. Insect Molecular Biology 10:415-420.
39. Georgen, E., and C. C. Daehler. 2001. Inflorescence damage by insects and fungi in native pili grass (Heteropogon contortus) versus alien foundation grass (Pennisetum setaceum) in Hawaii. Pacific Science 55:129-136.
40. Graham, R. A. 1939. Principles of forest entomology. McGraw-Hill, New York, New York, USA.
41. Haack, R. A., and D. Kucera. 1993. New introduction: common pine shoot beetle, Tomicus piniperda (L.). USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, Pest Alert NA-TP-05-93. USDA Forest service, Washington, D.C., USA.
42. Haack, R. A., R. K. Lawrence, and G. C. Heaton, 2001. Tomicus piniperda (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) shoot-feeding characteristics and overwintering behavior in Scotch pine Christmas trees. Journal of Economic Entomology 94:422-129.
43. Haider, I. C. 2002. Forest pests and diseases of southern Europe. Institut Européen de la Forêt Cultivée (IEFC), Cestas, France.
44. Harrington, T. C., and M. J. Wingfield. 1998. Diseases and ecology of indigenous and exotic pines. Pages 381-404 in D. M. Richardson, editor. Ecology and biogeography of Pinus. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
45. Hausner, G., M. Iranpour, J. J. Kim, C. Breuil, C. N. Davis, E. A. Gibb, J. Reid, P. C. Loewen, and A. A. Hopkin. 2005. Fungi vectored by the introduced bark beetle Tomicus piniperda in Ontario, Canada, and comments on the taxonomy of Leptographium lundbergii, Leptographium terebrantis, Leptographium truncatum, and Leptographium wing-fieldii. Canadian Journal of Botany 83:1222-1237.
46. Hierro, J. L., J. L. Maron, and R. M. Callaway. 2005. A biogeographical approach to plant invasions: the importance of studying exotics in their introduced and native range. Journal of Ecology 93:5-15.
47. Honkanen, T., E. Haukioja. and J. Suomela. 1994. Effects of simulated defoliation and debudding on needle and shoot growth in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) - implications of plant source-sink relationships for plant-herbivore studies. Functional Ecology 8:631-639.
48. Ishtiaq, F., J. S. Beadell, A. J. Baker, A. R. Rahmani, Y. V. Jhala, and R. C. Fleischer. 2006. Prevalence and evolutionary relationships of haematozoan parasites in native versus introduced populations of common myna Acridotheres tristis. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 273:587-594.
49. Jactel, H., E. G. Brockerhoff, and P. Duelli. 2005. A test of the biodiversity-stability theory: Meta-analysis of tree species diversity effects on insect pest infestations, and re-examination of responsible factors. Pages 235-256 in M. Scherer-Lorenzen, C. Körner, and E.-D. Schulze, editors. Forest diversity and function: temperate and boreal systems. Ecological studies. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
50. Jactel, H., P. Menassieu, F. Vetillard, A. Gaulier, J. C. Samalens, and E. G. Brockerhoff, 2006. Tree species diversity reduces the invasibility of Maritime pine stands by the bast scale, Matsucoccus feytaudi (Homoptera: Margarodidae). Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36:314-323.
51. Keane, R. M., and M. J. Crawley. 2002. Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17:164-170.
52. Kerdelhue. C., G. Roux-Morabito, J. Forichon, J. M. Chambon, E. Robert, and F. Lieutier. 2002. Population genetic structure of Tomicus piniperda L. (Curculionidae: Scolytinae) on different pine species and validation of T. destruens (Woll.). Molecular Ecology 11:483-494.
53. Kohlmayr, B., M. Riegler, R. Wegensteiner, and C. Stauffer. 2002. Morphological and genetic identification of the three pine pests of the genus Tomicus (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) in Europe. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 4:151-157.
54. Kozlowski, T. T. 1969. Tree physiology and forest pests. Journal of Forestry 67:118-123.
55. Långströ m, B. 1983. Life cycles and shoot-feeding of the pine shoot beetles. Studia Forestalia Suecica 163:1-29.
56. Långströ m, B. 1984. Windthrown Scots pines as brood material for Tomicus piniperda and T. minor. Silva Fennica 18:187-198.
57. Långström, B., and C. Hellqvist. 1990. Spatial distribution and crown damage and growth losses caused by recurrent attacks of pine shoot beetles in pine stands surrounding a pulp mill in southern Sweden. Journal of Applied Entomology 110:261-269.
58. Långströ m, B., and C. Hellqvist. 1993. Scots pine susceptibility to attack by Tomicus piniperda (L.) as related to pruning date and attack density, Annals of Forest Science 50:101-117.
59. Lau, J. A., and S. Y. Strauss. 2005. Insect herbivores drive important indirect effects of exotic plants on native communities. Ecology 86:2990-2997.
60. Lavery, P. B., and D. J. Mead. 1998. Pinus radiata: a narrow endemic from North America takes the world. Pages 432-449 in D. M. Richardson, editor. Ecology and biogeography of Pinus. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
61. Leimu, R., and J. Koricheva. 2006. A meta-analysis of tradeoffs between plant tolerance and resistance to herbivores: combining the evidence from ecological and agricultural studies. Oikos 112:1-9.
62. Lieutier. F., G. Vouland, and M. Pettinetti. 1997. Testing the preferences of Scolytidae and other xylophagous insects. Revue Forestière Française 49:215-224.
63. Liu, H., and P. Stiling. 2006. Testing the enemy release hypothesis: a review and meta-analysis. Biological Invasions 8:1535-1545.
64. Liu, H., P. Stiling, and R. W. Pemberton. 2007. Does enemy release matter for invasive plants? Evidence from a comparison of insect herbivore damage among invasive, noninvasive and native congeners. Biological Invasions 9:773-781.
65. Lodge, D. M., S. Williams, H. J. MacIsaac, K. R. Hayes, B. Leung, S. Reichard, R. N. Mack, P. B. Moyle, M. Smith, D. A. Andow, J. T. Carlton, and A. McMichael. 2006. Biological invasions: recommendations for U.S. policy and management. Ecological Applications 16:2035-2054.
66. Lombardero, M. J. 1995. Planta hueśped y escolítidos (Col.: Scolytidae) en Galicia (NO Peninsula Iberica). Boletín Sanidad Vegetal. Plagas 21:357-370.
67. Mack, R. N., D. Simberloff, W. M, Lonsdale, H. Evans, M. Clout, and F. A. Bazzaz. 2000. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences and control. Ecological Applications 10:689-710.
68. Mansilla, J. P. 1992. Presencia sobre Eucalyptus globulus Labill de Gonipterus scutellatus Gyll. (Col. Curculionidae) en Galicia. Boletin de Sanidad Vegetal. Plagas 18:547-554.
69. Marquis, R. J. 1996. Plant architecture, sectoriality and plant tolerance to herbivores. Vegetatio 127:85-97.
70. Martinson, S. J., R. W. Hofstetter, and M. P. Ayres. 2007. Whydoes longleaf pine have low susceptibility to southern pine beetle? Canadian Journal of Forest Research 37(10): 1966-1977.
71. Masutti, L. 1969. Pine stands of the Adratic coast and Blastophagus piniperda: a bad combination. Monti e Boschi 20:15-27.
72. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente. 2002. III Inventario Forestal Nacional. 1997-2006. Galicia Lugo. Dirección General de Conservatión de la Naturaleza, Madrid, Spain.
73. Mitchell, C. E., et al. 2006. Biotic interactions and plant invasions. Ecology Letters 9:726-740. Mitchell, C. E., and A. G. Power. 2003. Release of invasive plants from fungal and viral pathogens. Nature 421:625-627.
74. Moorcroft, P. R., S. W. Pacala, and M. A. Lewis. 2006. Potential role of natural enemies during tree range expansions following climate change. Journal of Theoretical Biology 241:601-616.
75. Mortenson, S. G., and R. N. Mack. 2006. The fate of alien conifers in long-term plantings in the USA. Diversity and Distributions 12:456-466.
76. Nadel, H., J. H. Frank, and R. J. Knight. 1992. Escapees and accomplices: the naturalization of exotic Ficus and their associated faunas in Florida. Florida Entomologist 75:29-38.
77. Parker, I. M., and G. S. Gilbert. 2004. The evolutionary ecology of novel plant-pathogen interactions. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 35:675-700.
78. Parker, I. M., and G. S. Gilbert. 2007. When there is no escape: the effects of natural enemies on native, invasive, and noninvasive plants. Ecology 88:1210-1224.
79. Parker, J. D., D. E. Burkepile, and M. E. Hay. 2006. Opposing effects of native and exotic herbivores on plant invasions. Science 311:1459-1461.
80. Peterson, G. W. 1981. Pine and juniper diseases in the Great Plains. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-86. USDA Forest service, Washington, D.C., USA.
81. Petrakis, P. V., V. Roussis, D. Papadimitriou, C. Vagias, and C. Tsitsimpikou. 2005. The effect of terpenoid extracts from 15 pine species on the feeding behavioural sequence of the late instars of the pine processionary caterpillar Thaumetopoea pityocampa. Behavioural Processes 69:303-322.
82. Petrakis, P. V., C. Tsitsimpikou, O. Tzakou, M, Couladis, C. Vagias, and V. Roussis. 2001. Needle volatiles from five Pinus species growing in Greece. Flavour and Fragrance Journal 16:249-252.
83. Pfeffer, A. 1995. Zentral- und westpalä arktische Boeken- und kernkä fer. Pro Entomologia. Museum of Natural History, Basel, Switzerland.
84. Price, R. A., A. Liston, and S. H. Strauss. 1998. Phylogeny and systematics of Pinus. Pages 49-69 in D. M. Richardson, editor. Ecology and biogeography of Pinus. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
85. Richardson, D. M., N. Allsopp, C. M. D'antonio, S. J. Milton, and M. Rejmanek. 2000. Plant invasions: the role of mutualisms. Biological Reviews 75:65-93.
86. Roques, A., M. A. Auger-Rozenberg, and S. Boivin. 2006. A lack of native congeners may limit colonization of introduced conifers by indigenous insects in Europe. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36:299-313.
87. Salonen, K. 1973. On the life cycle, especially on the reproduction biology of Blastophagus piniperda L. (Coleoptera, Scolytidae). Acta Forestalia Fennica 127:1-72.
88. Santos, A. M., T. Vasconcelos, E. Mateus, M. H. Farrall, M. D. R. Gomes da Silva, M. R. Paiva, and M. Branco. 2006. Characterization of the volatile fraction emitted by phloems of four Pinus species by solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A 1105:191-198.
89. Sedjo, R. A. 1983. The comparative economics of plantation forestry: a global assessment. Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C., USA
90. Seifert, K. A. 1993. Sapstain of commercial lumber by species of Ophiostoma and Ceratocystis. Pages 141-151 in M. J. Wingfield, K. A. Seifert, and J. F. Webber, editors. Ophiostoma and Ceratocystis: taxonomy, ecology and pathogenecity. APS Press, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
91. Speight, M. R., and D. Wainhouse. 1989. Ecology and management of forest insects. Oxford Science Publications, Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
92. Stamp, N. 2003. Out of the quagmire of plant defense hypotheses. Quarterly Review of Biology 78:23-55. Stastny, M., U. Schaffner, and E. Elle. 2005. Do vigour of introduced populations and escape from specialist herbivores contribute to invasiveness? Journal of Ecology 93:27-37.
93. Strauss, S. Y. 2001. Benefits and risks of biotic exchange between Eucalyptus plantations and native Australian forests. Austral Ecology 26:447-157.
94. Strauss, S. Y., and A. A. Agrawal. 1999. The ecology and evolution of plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14:179-185.
95. Swart, W. J., P. S. Knox-Davies, and M. J. Wingfield. 1985. Spaheropsis sapinea. with special reference to its occurrence in Pinus spp. in South Africa. Southern African Forestry Journal 35:1-8.
96. Tainter, F. H., and F. A. Baker. 1996. Principles of forest pathology. John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, USA.
97. Toro, J., and S. Gessel. 1999. Radiata pine plantations in Chile. New Forests 18:33-44.
98. Turchin, P., and W. T. Thoeny. 1993. Quantifying dispersal of southern pine beetles with mark recapture experiments and a diffusion-model. Ecological Applications 3:187-198.
99. Vasconcelos, T., A. Horn, F. Lieutier, M. Branco, and C. erdelhue. 2006. Distribution and population genetic structure of the Mediterranean pine shoot beetle Tomicus destruens in the Iberian Peninsula and Southern France. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 8:103-111.
100. Vila, M., J. L. Maron, and L. Marco. 2005. Evidence for the enemv release hvpothesis in Hypericum perforatum. Oecologia 142:474-479.
101. Volz, H. A. 1988. Monoterpenes governing host selection in the bark beetle Hylurgops palliatus and Tomicus piniperda. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 47:31-35.
102. Whitehill, J. G. A., J. S. Lehman, and P. Bonello. 2007. Ips pini (Curculionidae: Scolytinae) is a vector of the fungal pathogen, Sphaeropsis sapinea (Coelomycetes), to Austrian pines, Pinus nigra (Pinaceae). Environmental Entomology 36: 114-120.
103. Williamson, M. 1996. Biological invasions. Chapman and Hall, London, UK. Wingfield, M. J. 2003. Increasing threat of diseases to exotic plantation forests in the Southern hemisphere: lessons from Cryphonectria canker. Australasian Plant Pathology 32:133-139.
104. Xunta de Galicia. 1992. Plan forestal de Galicia. Consellería de Agricultura Gandería c Montes, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
105. Ylioja, T., D. H. Slone, and M. P. Ayres. 2005. Mismatch between herbivore behavior and demographics contributes to scale-dependence of host susceptibility in two pine species. Forest Science 51:522-531.
106. Zobel, B. J., G. van Wyk, and P. Stahl. 1987. Growing exotic forests. Wiley Press, New York, New York, USA.