Validation of a modern activity hand survey with respect to reliability, construct and criterion validity

Journal of Hand Surgery: European Volume

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 653-660

  Alexander, M ^a,b,c   Franko, O I ^a,b,c   Makhni, E C ^a,b,c   Zurakowski, D ^a,b,c   Day, Charles S ^a,b,c  

^a BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Functional outcomes; Hand function; Wrist survey

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRITERION RELATED VALIDITY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISABILITIES OF THE ARM SHOULDER AND HAND; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HAND DISEASE; HAND FUNCTION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MODERN ACTIVITY SUBJECTIVE SURVEY; OUTPATIENT; PATIENT RATED WRIST EVALUATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; TERTIARY HEALTH CARE; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; VALIDATION STUDY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HAND; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; MALE; MAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUESTIONNAIRES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 55949126696     PISSN: 17531934     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1753193408093810     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Beaton, DE, JN Katz, and AH Fossel (2001). Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. Journal of Hand Therapy, 14, 128-146.
2. Beaton, DE, JG Wright, JN Katz, and Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (2005). Development of the QuickDASH: Comparison of three item-reduction approaches. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 87A, 1038-1046.
3. Chung, KC, MS Pillsbury, MR Walters, and RA Hayward (1998). Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. Journal of Hand Surgery, 23A, 575-587.
4. Chung, KC, JB Hamill, MR Walters, and RA Hayward (1999). The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ): Assessment of responsiveness to clinical change. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 42, 619-622.
5. Cronbach, LJ (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
6. De Vellis, RF (Ed.) (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications. New York: SAGE.
7. Dowrick, AS, BJ Gabbe, OD Williamson, and PA Cameron (2005). Outcome instruments for the assessment of the upper extremity following trauma: a review. Injury, 36, 468-476.
8. Engelberg, R, DP Martin, and J Agel (1996). Musculoskeletal Function Assessment instrument: Criterion and construct validity. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 14, 182-192.
9. Feinstein, AR (1987). Clinimetrics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
10. Gummesson, C, MM Ward, and I Atroshi (2006). The shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH): Validity and reliability based on responses within the full-length DASH. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 18, 7-44.
11. Hudak, PL, PC Amadio, and C Bombardier (1996). Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: The DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 29, 602-608.
12. Hulley, SB, JN Martin, and SR Cummings (2001). Planning the measurements: Precision and accuracy. In Designing clinical research. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
13. Husted, JA, RJ Cook, and VT Farewell (2000). Methods for assessing responsiveness: A critical review and recommendations. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 53, 459-468.
14. Kotsis, SV, and KC Chung (2005). Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire in carpal tunnel surgery. Journal of Hand Surgery, 30A, 81-86.
15. Kotsis, SV, FH Lau, and KC Chung (2007). Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and physical measurements in outcome studies of distal radius fracture treatment. Journal of Hand Surgery, 32A, 84-90.
16. Levine, DW, BP Simmons, and MJ Koris (1993). A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 75A, 1582-1592.
17. MacDermid, JC (1996). Development of a scale for patient rating of wrist pain and disability. Journal of Hand Therapy, 9, 178-183.
18. MacDermid, JC, and V Tottenham (2004). Responsiveness of the disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) and patient-rated wrist/hand evaluation (PRWHE) in evaluating change after hand therapy. Journal of Hand Therapy, 17, 18-23.
19. MacDermid, JC, RS Richards, A Donner, N Bellamy, and JH Roth (2000). Responsiveness of the short form-36, disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire, patient-rated wrist evaluation, and physical impairment measurements in evaluating recovery after a distal radius fracture. Journal of Hand Surgery, 25A, 330-340.
20. Martin, DP, R Engelberg, J Agel, D Snapp, and MF Swiontkowski (1996). Development of a musculoskeletal extremity health status instrument: The Musculoskeletal Function Assessment instrument. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 14, 173-181.
21. Martin, DP, R Engelberg, J Agel, and MF Swiontkowski (1997). Comparison of the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire with the Short Form-36, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and the Sickness Impact Profile healthstatus measures. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 79A, 1323-1355.
22. McHorney, CA, JE Ware, Jr, and AE Raczek (1993). The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Medical Care, 31, 247-263.
23. Michener, LA, and BG Leggin (2001). A review of self-report scales for the assessment of functional limitation and disability of the shoulder. Journal of Hand Therapy, 14, 68-76.
24. Nunnally, JC (1978). Psychometric theory, 2nd Edn. New York, New York: McGraw-Hill.
25. Offenbaecher, M, T Ewert, O Sangha, and G Stucki (2002). Validation of a German version of the disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (DASH-G). Journal of Rheumatology, 29, 401-402.
26. SooHoo, NF, AP McDonald, JG Seiler, 3rd, and GR McGillivary (2002). Evaluation of the construct validity of the DASH questionnaire by correlation to the SF-36. Journal of Hand Surgery, 27A, 537-541.
27. Stewart, AL, and JE Ware, Jr (1992). Measuring functioning and well-being: The medical outcomes study approach. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
28. Streiner, D, and G Norman (1995). Health Measurement Scales: A practical guide to their development and use, 2nd Edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.