The impact of visual factors on noise annoyance among people living in the vicinity of wind turbines

Journal of Environmental Psychology

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 379-389

  Pedersen, Eja ^a   Larsman, Pernilla ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 55949124475     PISSN: 02724944     EISSN: 15229610     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.02.009     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Allison P.D. Missing data techniques for structural equation modelling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 112 (2003) 545-557
2. Arbuckle J.L., and Wothke W. AMOS 4.0 user's guide (1995), SmallWaters Corporation, Chicago, IL
3. Aylor D.E., and Marks L.E. Perception of noise transmitted through barriers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 59 (1976) 397-400
4. Bangjun Z., Lili S., and Guoqing D. The influence of the visibility of the source on the subjective annoyance due to its noise. Applied Acoustics 64 (2003) 1205-1215
5. Berglund, B., & Lindvall, T. (Eds.), (1995). Community noise. Document prepared for the World Health Organisation. Archives of the Centre for Sensory Research 2, 1-195.
6. Bollen K. Structural equations with latent variables (1989), Wiley, New York, NY
7. Browne M.W., and Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen K.A., and Long J.S. (Eds). Testing structural equation models (1993), Sage, Newbury Park, CA 136-162
8. Brush R.O., and Palmer J.F. Measuring the impact of urbanization on scenic quality: Land use change in the northeast. Proceedings of our national landscape. A conference on applied techniques for analyses and management of the visual resource (1979), Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. USDA Forest Service, Berkley, CA 358-364
9. Calvert G.A. Crossmodal processing in the human brain: Insights from functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex 11 (2001) 1100-1123
10. Fields J.M. Effect of personal and situational variables on noise annoyance in residential areas. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 93 (1993) 2753-2763
11. Fornell C., and Larcker D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1981) 39-50
12. Guski R. Personal and social variables as co-determinants of noise annoyance. Noise & Health 3 (1999) 45-56
13. Hartig T., Evans G.W., Jamner L.D., Davis D.S., and Gärling T. Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology 23 (2003) 109-123
14. Hartig T., and Staats H. The need for psychological restoration as a determinant of environmental preferences. Journal of Environmental Psychology 26 (2006) 215-226
15. Hu L.-T., and Bentler P.M. Evaluating model fit. In: Hoyle R.H. (Ed). Structural equation modelling. Concepts, issues, and applications (1995), Sage, London
16. Job R.F.S. Community response to noise: A review of factors influencing the relationship between noise exposure and reaction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 83 (1988) 991-1001
17. Kastka J., and Hangartner M. Machen hässliche Strassen den Verkehrslärm lästiger? (Do ugly streets increase road traffic noise annoyance?). Arcus 1 (1986) 23-29 [in German]
18. Kastner S., and Ungerleider L.G. Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience 23 (2000) 315-341
19. Kline R.B. Principles and practice of structural equation modelling (1998), The Guilford Press, New York, NY
20. Miedema H.M.E., and Voss H. Exposure response relationships for transportation noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 104 (1998) 3432-3445
21. Miedema H.M.E., and Vos H. Demographic and attitudinal factors that modify annoyance from transportation noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 105 (1999) 3336-3344
22. Pedersen E., Hallberg L.R.-M., and Persson Waye K. Living in the vicinity of wind turbines-A grounded theory study. Qualitative Research in Psychology 4 (2007) 49-63
23. Pedersen E., and Persson Waye K. Perception and annoyance due to wind turbine noise-A dose-response relationship. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116 (2004) 3460-3470
24. Pedersen E., and Persson Waye K. Wind turbine noise, annoyance and self-reported health and wellbeing in different living environments. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 64 (2007) 480-486
25. Pedersen, T. H., & Nielsen, K. S. (1994). Genvirkning af støj fra vindmøller (Annoyance by noise from wind turbines). Report 150, DELTA Acoustic & Vibration, Lydtekniske Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark [in Danish].
26. Staats H., Kieviet A., and Hartig T. Where to recover from attentional fatigue: An expectancy-value analysis of environmental preference. Journal of Environmental Psychology 23 (2003) 147-157
27. Stein B.E., and Meredith M.A. Merging of the senses (1993), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
28. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency (2001). Ljud från vindkraftverk (Noise from wind turbines). Report 6241 [In Swedish].
29. Ulrich R.S. Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In: Altmann I., and Wohlwill J.F. (Eds). Behavior and the Natural Environment (1983), Plenum, New York, NY 85-125
30. Viollon, S., & Lavandier, C. (2002). Environmental approach of the perception of noise transmitted through barriers. In Proceedings of internoise, Derborn, MI, USA, 19-21 August 2002, paper no. 519.
31. Viollon S., Lavandier C., and Drake C. Influence of visual setting on sound ratings in an urban environment. Applied Acoustics 63 (2002) 493-511