A hemodynamic evaluation of the medos deltastream DP1 rotary pump and Jostra HL-20 roller pump under pulsatile and nonpulsatile perfusion in an infant cardiopulmonary bypass model-a pilot study

ASAIO Journal

Volumn 54, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 529-533

  Rider, Alan R ^a   Griffith, Kimberly ^a   Ressler, Noel ^a   Kunselman, Allen R ^a   Wang, Shigang ^a   Ündar, Akif ^a,b  

^a PENN STATE CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b PENN STATE COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALOG TEST; BYPASS CIRCUITS; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; FLOW WAVEFORMS; HEMODYNAMIC ENERGY; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; PERFUSION SYSTEM; PILOT STUDIES; ROLLER PUMPS; SURPLUS HEMODYNAMIC ENERGIES; WAVE FORMS;

BLOOD; FLOW RATE; HEMODYNAMICS; HYDRODYNAMICS; MERCURY (METAL); PULSATILE FLOW; ROLLERS (MACHINE COMPONENTS);

ROTARY PUMPS;

BLOOD; BLOOD PUMP; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENERGY; EVALUATION; FLOW KINETICS; FLOW MEASUREMENT; FLOW RATE; HEART PERFUSION; HEMODYNAMICS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIQUID; LUNG PERFUSION; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; PERFUSION; PILOT STUDY; PRESSURE; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PULSATILE FLOW; SIMULATION; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENERGY METABOLISM; HEART ASSIST DEVICE; HUMAN; INFANT; INSTRUMENTATION; PHYSIOLOGY;

CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; ENERGY METABOLISM; HEART-ASSIST DEVICES; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; INFANT; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; PERFUSION; PILOT PROJECTS; PULSATILE FLOW;

EID: 55949088238     PISSN: 10582916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e318186bd8d     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Ündar A: Pulsatile versus nonpulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass procedures in neonates and infants: From bench to clinical practice. ASAIO J 51: vi-x, 2005.
2. Alkan T, Akçevin A, Ündar A, et al: Benefits of pulsatile perfusion on vital organ recovery during and after pediatric open heart surgery. ASAIO J 53: 651-654, 2007.
3. Ji B, Ündar A: Comparison of perfusion modes on microcirculation during acute and chronic cardiac support: Is there a difference? Perfusion 22: 115-119, 2007.
4. Ündar A, Eichstaedt HC, Masia T, et al: Comparisons of six pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass pumps during pulsatile and nonpulsatile perfusion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 122: 827-829, 2001.
5. Göbel C, Arvand A, Rau G, et al: A new rotary blood pump for versatile extracorporeal circulation: The DeltaStreamTM. Perfusion 17: 373, 2002.
6. Göbel C, Arvand A, Eilers R, et al: Development of the MEDOS/ HIA DeltaStream extracorporeal rotary blood pump. Artif Organs 25: 358-365, 2001.
7. Christiansen S, Göbel C, Buhre W, et al: Successful use of a miniaturized bypass system with the DeltaStream extracorporeal rotary blood pump. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 125: 43-44, 2003.
8. Ündar A, Ji B, Rider A, et al: Comparison of four different pediatric 10F aortic cannulae during pulsatile versus nonpulsatile perfusion in a simulated neonatal model of cardiopulmonary bypass. ASAIO J 53: 778-784, 2007.
9. Rider AR, Ji B, Kunselman AR, et al: A performance evaluation of eight geometrically different 10 Fr pediatric arterial cannulae under pulsatile and nonpulsatile perfusion conditions in an infant cardiopulmonary bypass model. ASAIO J 54: 306-315, 2008.
10. Shepard RB, Simpson DC, Sharp JF: Energy equivalent pressure. Arch Surg 93: 730-740, 1966.
11. Travis A, Giridharan G, Pantalos G, et al: Vascular pulsatility in patients with a pulsatile- or continuous-flow ventricular assist device. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 133: 517-524, 2007.
12. Wang S, Miller A, Myers JL, Ündar A: "Stolen" blood flow: The effect of an open arterial filter purge line in a simulated neonatal CPB model. ASAIO J 54: 432-435, 2008.