Clinical evaluation of a resin-based desensitizing agent and self-etching adhesive on reduction of postoperative sensitivity of amalgam restorations

Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Volumn 9, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 009-016

  Hajizadeh, Hila ^a   Akbari, Majid ^a   Ghavamnasiri, Marjaneh ^a   Abedini, Sara ^b  

^a MASHHAD UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^b NONE

Author keywords

All in one adhesive system; Amalgam; Cavity varnish; Randomized clinical trial; Resin based desensitizing agent

Indexed keywords

COPALITE; DENTAL ALLOY; PLANT RESIN; PROMPT L POP; PROMPT L-POP; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; VIVASENS LINER;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLD; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; HUMAN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COLD TEMPERATURE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL CAVITY LINING; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; HUMANS; RESIN CEMENTS; RESINS, PLANT; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 55849142569     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15263711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Cenci MS, Piva E, Potrich F, Formolo E, Demarco FF, Powers JM. Microleakage in bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive materials. Braz Dent J 2004 15(1):13-8.
2. Mahler DB, Engle JH. Clinical evaluation of amalgam bonding in Class I and II restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2000 Jan;131(1):43-9.
3. Browning WD, Johnson WW, Gregory PN. Reduction of postoperative pain: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc 1997 Dec;128(12):1661-7.
4. Browning WD, Johnson WW, Gregory PN. Postoperative pain following bonded amalgam restorations. Oper Dent 1997 Mar;22(2):66-71.
5. Schwartz RS, Conn LJ, Jr., Haveman CW. Clinical evaluation of two desensitizing agents for use under Class 5 silver amalgam restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1998 Sep;80(3):269-73.
6. Gordan VV, Mjor IA, Hucke RD, Smith GE. Effect of different liner treatments on postoperative sensitivity of amalgam restorations. Quintessence Int 1999 Jan;30(1):55-9.
7. Gordan VV, Mjor IA, Moorhead JE. Amalgam restorations: postoperative sensitivity as a function of liner treatment and cavity depth. Oper Dent 1999 Nov;24(6):377-83.
8. Kennington LB, Davis RD, Murchison DF, Langenderfer WR. Short-term clinical evaluation of postoperative sensitivity with bonded amalgams. Am J Dent 1998 Aug;11(4):177-80.
9. Al Omari WM, Al Omari QD, Omar R. Effect of cavity disinfection on postoperative sensitivity associated with amalgam restorations. Oper Dent 2006 Mar;31(2):165-70.
10. Roberson TM, Heymann HO. Sturdevant's Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. 5 ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2006. p. 311.
11. Stockton LW, Tsang ST. Microleakage of Class II posterior composite restorations with gingival margins placed entirely within dentin. J Can Dent Assoc 2007 Apr;73(3):255.
12. Brackett WW, Covey DA, St GH, Jr. One-year clinical performance of a self-etching adhesive in class V resin composites cured by two methods. Oper Dent 2002 May;27(3):218-22.
13. Pontes DG, de Melo AT, Monnerat AF. Microleakage of new all-in-one adhesive systems on dentinal and enamel margins. Quintessence Int 2002 Feb;33(2):136-9.
14. Moore DS, Johnson WW, Kaplan I. A comparison of amalgam microleakage with a 4-META liner and copal varnish. Int J Prosthodont 1995 Sep;8(5):461-6.
15. Camps J, About I, Van Meerbeek B, Franquin JC. Efficiency and cytotoxicity of resin-based desensitizing agents. Am J Dent 2002 Oct;15(5):300-4.
16. Betke H, Kahler E, Reitz A, Hartmann G, Lennon A, Attin T. Influence of bleaching agents and desensitizing varnishes on the water content of dentin. Oper Dent 2006 Sep;31(5):536-42.
17. Mahler DB, Nelson LW. Sensitivity answers sought in amalgam alloy microleakage study. J Am Dent Assoc 1994 Mar;125(3):282-8.
18. Mahler DB, Adey JD. All factors related to the microleakage of amalgam alloys (abstract 1494). J Dent Res 1997;76:200.