Evolutionary changes in the complexity of the tectum of nontetrapods: A cladistic approach

PLoS ONE

Volumn 3, Issue 10, 2008, Pages

  Maximino, Caio ^a  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEVELOPMENT; CLADISTICS; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOARCHITECTURE; EVOLUTIONARY DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; HYPOTHESIS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; SPECIES COMPARISON; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; VALIDATION PROCESS; ANIMAL; BIOLOGY; CELL COUNT; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE ANATOMY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CYTOLOGY; EVOLUTION; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TECTUM; VERTEBRATE;

ANIMALIA; VERTEBRATA;

CYTOCHROME B;

ANATOMY, COMPARATIVE; ANIMALS; CELL COUNT; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; CYTOCHROMES B; EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TECTUM MESENCEPHALI; VERTEBRATES;

EID: 55849107785     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003582     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Butler AB, Hodos W (2005) Comparative vertebrate neuroanatomy: evolution and adaptation. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
2. Huber GC, Crosby EC (1933) A phylogenetic consideration of the optic tectum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 19: 15-22.
3. Northcutt GR (2002) Understanding vertebrate brain evolution. Integ Comp Biol 42: 743-756.
4. Eldredge N, Cracraft J (1980) Phylogenetic patterns and the evolutionary process. New York: Columbia University Press.
5. Smeets WJA (1981) Retinofugal pathways in two chondrichthyans, the shark Scyliorhinus canicula and the ray Raja clavata. J Comp Neurol 195: 1-11.
6. Ebbesson SOE (1984) Structure and connections of the optic tectum in elasmobranchs. In Comparative neurology of the optic tectum. Vanegas H, ed. New York: Plenum Press. pp 33-46.
7. Ramón P (1899) El lóbulo de los peces (teleosteos). Rev Trimestr Micrograf 4: 87-107.
8. Northcutt RG (1983) Evolution of the optic tectum in ray-finned fishes. In Fish neurobiology. II. Higher brain areas and functions Davis RD, Northcutt RG, eds. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. pp 1-42.
9. Repérant J, Miceli D, Rio P, Peyrichoux J, Pierre J, Kirpitchnikova E (1986) The anatomical organization of retinal projections in the shark Scyliorhinus canicula with special reference to the evolution of the selachian primary visual system. Brain Res Rev 11: 227-248.
10. Manso MJ, Anadón R (1991) The optic tectum of the dogfish Scyliorhinus canicula L: A Golgi study. J Comp Neurol 307: 335-349.
11. Jacobson M, Gaze RM (1965) Selection of appropriate tectal connections by regenerating optic nerve fibers in adult goldfish. Exp Neurol 13: 418-430.
12. Schwassman HO, Kruger L (1965) Organization of the visual projection upon the optic tectum of some freshwater fish. J Comp Neurol. pp 113-126.
13. Gaze RM, Keating MJ (1969) The depth distribution of visual units in the tectum of the frog following regeneration of the optic nerve. J Physiol 200: 128P-129P.
14. Gaze RM, Sharma SC (1970) Axial differences in the reinnervation of the goldfish optic tectum by regenerating optic nerve fibres. Exp Brain Res 10: 171-181.
15. Huber R, Rylander MK (1992) Brain morphology and turbidity preference in Notropis and related genera (Cyprinidae, Teleostei). In: Environmental biology of fishes 33. Balon EK, Wieser W, Schiemer F, Goldschmidt A, Kotrschal K, eds. Dodrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp 153-165.
16. Huber R, van Staaden M, Kaufman LS, Liem KF (1997) Microhabitat use, trophic patterns and the evolution of brain structure in African cichlids. Brain Behav Evol 50: 167-18.
17. Kotrschal K, van Staaden MJ, Huber R (1998) Fish brains: Evolution and environmental relationships. Rev Fish Biol Fish 8: 373-408.
18. Striedter G (2005) Principles of brain evolution. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Press.
19. Blomberg SP, Garland Jr T, Ives AR (2003) Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57: 717-745.
20. Maddison WP, Maddison DR (2007) Mesquite: A modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 2.0. Available in http://mesquiteproject.org.
21. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4: 406-525.
22. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1999) CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequences alignment through sequence weighting, position specific gap penalties, and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22: 4673-4680.
23. Felsenstein J (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am Nat 125: 1-15.
24. Garland Jr T, Ives AR (2000) Using the past to predict the present: Confidence intervals for regression equations in phylogenetic comparative methods. Am Nat 155: 346-364.
25. Garland Jr T, Dickerman AW, Janis CM, Jones JA (1993) Phylogenetic analysis of covariance by computer simulation. Syst Biol 42: 265-292.
26. Felsenstein J (1988) Phylogenies and quantitative characters. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 19: 445-471.
27. Rohlf FJ, Sokal RR (1981) Statistical tables, 2nd edition. New York: W. H. Freeman.
28. Heier P (1948) Fundamental principles in the structure of the brain. A study of the brain of Petromyzon fluviatilis. Acta Anat 5: 7-213.
29. Kennedy MC, Rubinson K (1984) Development and structure of the lamprey optic tectum. In Comparative neurology of the optic tectum. Vanegas H, ed. NY: Plenum Press. pp 1-13.
30. Clairambault P, Capanna E, Chanconie M, Pinganaud G (1974) Architectural pattern of the diencephalon and mesencephalon of the African lungfish Protopterus dolloi. Boll Zool 41: 107-122.
31. Iwahori NK, Nakamura K, Tsuda A (1996) Neuronal organization of the optic tectum in the hagfish, Eptatretus burgeri: A Golgi study. Anat Embryol 193: 271-279.
32. Farner H-P (1978) Untersuchungen zur Embryoanalentwicklung des Gehirns von Scyliorhinus canicula (L). II. Das Tectum opticum und dessen Stratification. J Hirnfirsch 19: 333-344.
33. Leghissa S (1955) La struttura microscopica e la citoarchitettonica del tetto ottico dei pesci teleostei. Z Anat Entw Gesh 118: 427-463.
34. Meek J, Schellart NAM (1978) A Golgi study of goldfish optic tectum. J Comp Neurol 182: 89-122.
35. Odenthal J, van Eeden FJM, Haffter P, Ingham PW, Nüsslein-Volhard C (2000) Two distinct cell populations in the floor plate of the zebrafish are induced by different pathways. Dev Biol 219: 350-363.
36. Lázár G, Losonczy A (1999) NADPH-diaphorase-positive neurons and pathways in the brain of the frog Rana esculenta. Anat Embryol (Berlin) 199: 185-198.
37. Baez J, Monzón-Mayor M, Yances C, Romero-Alemán MM, Arbelo-Gálvan JF, Puelles L (2003) Neuronal differentiation patterns in the optic tectum of the lizard Gallotia galloti. Brain Res 9715: 48-65.
38. Puelles L, Bendala MC (1978) Differentiation of neuroblasts in the chick optic tectum up to eight days of incubation: A Golgi study. Neuroscience 3: 307-325.
39. Gray GE, Sanes JR (1992) Lineage of radial glia in the chicken optic tectum. Development 114: 271-283.
40. Scicolone G, Pereyra-Alfonso S, Brusco A, Saavedra JP, Flores V (2001) Development of the laminated pattern of the chick tectum opticum. Brain Res Bull 55: 695-710.
41. Pasquale EB (2005) Eph receptor signalling casts a wide net on cell behaviour.
42. Hatten ME (1999) Central nervous system neuronal migration. Ann Rev Neurosci 22: 511-539.
43. Nieuwenhuys R, ten Dokelaar HJ, Nicholson C (1998) The central nervous system of vertebrates. Berlin/Heilderberg/New York: Springer.
44. Puelles L, Medina L (2002) Field homology as a way to reconcile genetic and developmental variability with adult homology. Brain Res Bull 57: 243-255.
45. Hall BK (2003) Unlocking the black box between genotype and phenotype: Cell condensations as morphogenetic (modular) units. Biol Phil 18: 219-247.
46. Redies C, Takeichi M (1996) Cadherins in the developing central nervous system: An adhesive code for segmental and functional subdivisions. Dev Biol 180: 413-423.
47. Nollet F, Kools P, van Roy F (2000) Phylogenetic analysis of the cadherin superfamily allows identification of six major subfamilies besides several solitary members. J Mol Biol 299: 551-572.