Do children matter? An examination of gender differences in environmental valuation

Working Paper - Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment

Volumn , Issue 1, 2003, Pages 1-30

  Dupont, Diane P ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^b BROCK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Children; CVM; Environmental valuation; Gender; WTP

Indexed keywords

EID: 55849106626     PISSN: 09678875     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Becker, O.S., (1965). A theory of the allocation of time. Economic Journal. 75, 493-517.
2. Berrens, R.P., Bohara, A.K., and Kerkvliet, J. (1997). A randomized response approach to dichotomous choice contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79, 252-266.
3. Bittman, M., and Wajcman, J. (1999). "The Rush Hour: The Quality of Leisure Time and Gender Equity, " Social Policy Research Centre Discussion Paper No. 97, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
4. Blocker, T.J., and Eckberg, D.L. (1989). Environmental issues as women's issues: general concerns and local hazards. Social Science Quarterly. 70, 586-593.
5. Bord, R.J., and O'Connor, R.E. (1997). The gender gap in environmental attitudes: the case of perceived vulnerability to risk. Social Science Quarterly. 78(4), 830-840.
6. Brown, K., and Taylor, L. (2000). Do as you say, say as you do: evidence on gender differences in actual and stated contributions to public goods. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 43, 127-139.
7. Brown-Kruse, J., and Hummels, D. (1993). Gender effects in laboratory public goods contributions. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 22, 255-267.
8. Budig, M., and Folbre, N. (2002). Has Parental Time Devoted to Children Remained Unchanged? Manuscript. Department of Sociology. University of Massachusetts.
9. Burton, P., Phipps, S. and Curtis, L. (2002) "All in the Family: A Simultaneous Model of Parenting Style and Child Conduct," American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 92:2: 368-372.
10. Cadsby, B., and Maynes, E. (1998). Gender and free riding in a threshold public goods game: experimental evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 34, 603-620.
11. Cameron, T., and James, M. (1987). Efficient estimation methods for use with "closedended" contingent valuation survey data. Review of Economics and Statistics 69, 269-276.
12. Cameron, T., and Englin, J. (1997). Respondent experience and contingent valuation of environmental goods. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 33, 296-313.
13. Carson, R. (1991). Constructed markets. Chapter V in Measuring the Demand for Environmental Quality edited by J. Braden and C. Kolstad. North-Holland Publishing Co, Amsterdam, pp. 121-162.
14. Carson, R., and Mitchell, R. (1993). "The Value of Clean Water: The Public's Willingness to Pay for Boatable, Fishable, and Swimmable Quality Water" Water Resources Research, 29 (7 July): 2445-2454.
15. Carson, R., Mitchell, R., Hanemann, W.; Kopp, R., Presser, S., and Rudd, P. (1994). Contingent valuation and lost passive use: damages from the Exxon Valdez. Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 94-18. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
16. Daly, M., Wilson, M. and Gordon, S. (1996) Shoreline "Transect" Survey for McMaster Ecowise Hamilton Harbour Watershed Project (http://www.mcmaster.ca/ecowise/percept/-June, 1 2001).
17. Deyak, T.A., and Smith, V.K. (1978). Congestion and participation in outdoor recreation: A household production function approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 5: 63-80.
18. Dillman, D. (1978). Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
19. Dosman, D. and W. Adamowicz. (2002). Combining stated and revealed preference data to construct an empirical examination of intrahousehold bargaining. Paper presented at the World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economics. Monterey, California. June 24-27, 2002.
20. Drolet, M. (1999). The persistent gap: new evidence in the Canadian gender wage gap. Catalogue 75F0002MIE-99008, Statistics Canada. Income Statistics Division.
21. Fortin, N., and Lemieux, T. (2000). Are women's wage gains men's losses? A distributional test. American Economic Review. 90(2), 456-460.
22. Fox, M., and Firebaugh, G. (1992). Confidence in science: the gender gap. Social Science Quarterly. 73(1): 101-113.
23. Hanemann, W.M., Loomis, J., and Kanninen, B. (1991). Statistical efficiency of doublebounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73, 1255-1263.
24. Kealy, M., Montgomery, M., and Dovidio, J. (1990). Reliability and predictive validity of contingent values: does the nature of the good matter? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 19, 244-263.
25. Kolstad, C., and Braden, J. (1991). Environmental demand theory in Braden, J. and C. Kolstad (eds). Measuring the Demand for Environmental Quality Amsterdam: Elsevier Science pp. 17-40.
26. Krutilla, J.V. (1967). Conservation reconsidered. American Economic Review 57(4), 777-786.
27. Leeworthy, V.R. (2001). National survey on recreation and the environment (NSRE) 2000. Preliminary estimates from versions 1-6: coastal recreation participation. U.S. Department of Commerce. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
28. Mitchell, R., and Carson, R. (1989). Using surveys to value public goods : the contingent valuation method. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
29. Park, T., Loomis, J., and Creel, M. (1991). Confidence intervals for evaluating benefits from dichotomous choice contingent valuation studies. Land Economics. 67, 64-73.
30. Rodgers, G. (1992). Remedial action plan for Hamilton harbour. Volume I - Summary of RAP Stage 2 (November). Government of Canada. Canada-Ontario Agreement Respecting Great Lakes Water Quality.
31. Scott, K., and Lochhead, C. (1997). Are women catching up in the earnings race? The Canadian Council on Social Development Report # 532. (July 23, 1997).
32. Shaw, W., and Jakus, P. (1996). Travel cost models of the demand for rock climbing" Agricultural and Resource Economics Review October, 133-142.
33. Smith, V. 1998 Time and the valuation of environmental resources. Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 98-07. RFF, Washington, DC.
34. Statistics Canada. (1996). Census Statistics. Nations Series.
35. Statistics Canada. (1999). Overview of the time use of Canadians in 1998. Catalogue No. 12F0080XIE, Housing, Family and Social Statistics Division, General Social Survey.
36. Stern, P., Dietz, T., and Kalof, L. (1993). Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environment and Behaviour 25(3), 322-348.
37. Swallow, S., Weaver, T., Opaluch, J., and Michelman, T. (1994). Heterogeneous preferences and aggregation in environmental policy analysis: a landfill siting case American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76(3), 431-334.
38. Teal, G. and Loomis, J.B. (2000). Effects of gender and parental status on the economic valuation of increasing wetlands, reducing wildlife contamination and increasing salmon populations. Society and Natural Resources 13(1), 1-14.