Respondent experience and contingent valuation of environmental goods

Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 296-313

  Cameron, Trudy Ann ^a   Englin, Jeffrey ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL GOODS; ENVIRONMENTAL VALUE; RESPONDENT EXPERIENCE;

EID: 0031193460     PISSN: 00950696     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jeem.1997.0995     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ajzen I., Brown T. C., Rosenthal L. H. Information bias in contingent valuation: Effects of personal relevance, quality of information, and motivational orientation. J. Environ. Econom. Management. 30:1996;43-57.
2. Arrow K., Solow R., Portney P., Leamer E., Radner R., Schuman H. Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Federal Register. 58:1993;4602-4614.
3. Bergstrom J. C., Stoll J. R., Randall A. The impact of information on environmental commodity valuation decisions. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. 72:1990;614-621.
4. Bishop R. C., Heberlein T. A. Measuring values of extramarket goods: Are indirect measures biased? Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. 61:1979;926-930.
5. Boyle K. J., Welsh M. P., Bishop R. C. The role of question order and respondent experience in contingent valuation studies. J. Environ. Econom. Management. 25:1993;S80-S97.
6. Cameron T. A. A new paradigm for valuing non-market goods using referendum data: Maximum likelihood estimation by censored logistic regression. J. Environ. Econom. Management. 15:1988;355-379.
7. Cameron T. A., James M. D. Efficient estimation methods for 'closed-ended' contingent valuation surveys. Rev. Econom. Statist. 69:1987;269-275.
8. Cummings R. G., Brookshire D. S., Schulze W. D. Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method. 1986;Rowman and Allanheld, Totowa.
9. Davis J., O'Neill C. Discrete-choice valuation of recreational angling in northern Ireland. J. Agricultural Econom. 43:1992;452-457.
10. W. H. Greene, 1994, Accounting for excess zeros and sample selection in Poisson and negative binomial regression models, Stern School of Business, New York University, NY.
11. Greene W. H. Econometric Analysis. 1993;Macmillan, New York.
12. Hanemann W. M. Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. 66:1984;322-341.
13. Hausman J. Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment. 1993;North-Holland, Amsterdam.
14. J. R. Irwin, W. D. Schulze, G. H. McClelland, D. Waldman, D. J. Schenk, T. Stewart, L. Deck, P. Slovic, S. Lichtenstein, M. Thayer, March 1990, Valuing visibility: A field test of the contingent valuation method.
15. Kealy M. J., Dovidio J. F., Rockel M. L. Accuracy in valuation is a matter of degree. Land Economics. 64:1988;158-171.
16. Kealy M. J., Montgomery M., Dovidio J. F. Reliability and predictive validity of contingent values: Does the nature of the good matter? J. Environ. Econom. Management. 19:1990;244-263.
17. Larson D. M. Some further results on willingness to pay for non-market goods. J. Environ. Econom. Management. 23:1992;101-122.
18. J. K. Lazo, W. D. Schulze, G. H. McClelland, J. K. Doyle, August 1992, Can contingent valuation measure non-use values?
19. Maddala G. S. Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. 1983;Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.
20. G. H. McClelland, W. D. Schulze, J. K. Lazo, D. M. Waldman, J. K. Doyle, S. R. Elliot, J. R. Irwin, October 1992, Methods for measuring non-use values: A contingent valuation study of groundwater cleanup, Center for Economic Analysis, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO.
21. S. A. Shankle, J. E. Englin, W. H. Monroe, D. M. Beck, M. F. Casinelli, H. Saunders, S. E. Grover, 1990, Freshwater-based recreation in the upper northeast: Data collection documentation, Battelle-Pacific Northwest Laboratories.
22. Teisl M. F., Boyle K. J., McCollum D. W., Reiling S. D. Test-retest reliability of contingent valuation with independent sample pretest and posttest control groups. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. 77:1995;613-619.
23. Whitehead J. C., Blomquist G. C., Hoban T. J., Clifford W. B. Assessing the validity and reliability of contingent values: A comparison of on-site users, off-site users, and non-users. J. Environ. Econom. Management. 29:1995;238-251.