Metrics for the Evaluation of Models Business Process;Métricas para la evaluación de modelos de proceso de negocio

Actas IDEAS 2006 - 9th Workshop Iberoamericano de Ingenieria de Requisitos y Ambientes de Software

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 419-432

  Rolón, Elvira ^a   Ruiz, Francisco ^b   García, Félix ^b   Piattini, Mario ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE TAMAULIPAS   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CASTILLA LA MANCHA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 55849101189     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. BPMI, Business Process Modeling Notation, Business Process Management Initiative, Specification Version 1.0, (2004).
2. BPMN, Working Group. Business Process Management Initiative, Fecha de acceso: Mayo-2005, Fecha última actualización: Marzo-2005. www.bpmn.org/exampleIndex.htm
3. Canfora, G., García, F., Piattini, M., Ruiz, F. y Visaggio, C.A., A Family of Experiments to Validate Metrics for Software Process Models. Journal of Systems and Software, 77(2): (2005), 113-129.
4. García, F., Ruiz, F., Piattini, M., Canfora, G. y Visaggio, C.A., Framework for the Modeling and Evaluation of Software Processes. Journal of Systems Architecture, (aceptado para aparecer), (2006).
5. Gordijn, J., Akkermans, H. y van Vliet, H. Business Modelling is not Process Modelling. Conceptual Modeling for E-Business and The Web (ECOMO 2000). (Salt Lake City, USA, 2000) LNCS 1921. Springer-Verlag. 40-51
6. Hommes, B.J. y van Reijswoud V, The Quality of Business Process Modelling Techniques: The application of a framework for understanding the quality of UML, IFIP (1999).
7. Hommes, B.-J. y van Reijswoud, V. Assessing the Quality of Business Process Modelling Techniques. In Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, (Maui, Hawaii, USA, 2000) IEEE, 1007-1016
8. IBM, Modeling Business Measures, IBM WBI Workbench, (2003).
9. ISO/IEC, FCD9126-1.2, Information Technology-Software Product Quality-Part 1: Quality Model, (1998)
10. Latva-Koivisto, A. M. Finding a complexity measure for business process models. Systems Analysis Laboratory, Helsinky University of Technology, Reporte de investigación (2001).
11. Lindland, O.I., Sindre, G. y Solvnerg, A., Understanding Quality in Conceptual Modeling. Software IEEE, Vol. II(Issue 2), (1994). 42-49.
12. Popkin-Software, Enterprise Modeling: Aligning Business and Information Technology, White Paper, (1999).
13. Powell, S.G., Schwaninger, M. y Trimble, C., Measurement and control of business processes. System Dynamics Review, Vol. 17, No. 1, (Spring 2001): 63-61
14. Serrano, M., Piattini, M., Calero, C., Genero, M. y Miranda, D. Un Método para la Definición de Métricas de Software. MIFISIS, (Madrid, 2002) 65-74
15. Smith, H. y Fingar, P., Business Process Management: The Third Wave. USA: Meghan-Kiffer Press, (2003).
16. Smith, H., Neal, D., Ferrara, L. y Hayden, F., The Emergence of Business Process Management, CSĆs Research Services, (2002).
17. Tjaden, G.S., Narasimhan, S., y Mitra, S. Business Process Structural Analysis, Georgia Tech Center for Enterprise Systems, (1999).
18. van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M. y Weske, M. Business Process Management: A Survey. In International Conference on Business Process Management. (Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 2003) Springer-Verlag. 1-12
19. Vasconcelos, A., Caetano, A., Neves, J., Sinogas, P., Mendes, R. y Tribolet, J. A Framework for Modeling Strategy, Business Process and Informations Systems. In Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOĆ01). (Seattle Washington, USA. 2001) IEEE Computer Society, 69-80.
20. Vitolins, V. Business Process Measures. Proceedings of BALTIC DB&IS, (Riga, Latvia 2004) 186-197.
21. Weske, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P. y Verbeek, H.M.W., Advances in Business Process Management. Data & Knowledge Engineering, Vol. 50(Issue 1), (2004), 1-8
22. White, S.A., Introduction to BPMN, I. Corporation, Editor. (2004). www.bpmn.org