FMESP: Framework for the modeling and evaluation of software processes

Journal of Systems Architecture

Volumn 52, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 627-639

  García, Félix ^a   Piattini, Mario ^a   Ruiz, Francisco ^a   Canfora, Gerardo ^b   Visaggio, Corrado A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CASTILLA LA MANCHA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SANNIO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Conceptual framework; Software engineering environment; Software measurement; Software process modeling

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTS; SOFTWARE MEASUREMENTS; SOFTWARE PROCESS MODELING;

COMPETITIVE INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 33749648482     PISSN: 13837621     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sysarc.2006.06.007     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Basili V., and Rombach H. The TAME project: towards improvement-oriented software environments. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 14 6 (1988) 728-738
2. Basili V., Shull F., and Lanubile F. Building knowledge through families of experiments. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 25 4 (1999) 435-437
3. L. Briand, J. Wüstn, H.A. Lounis, Comprehensive investigation of quality factors in object-oriented designs: an industrial case study, Technical Report ISERN-98-29, International Software Engineering Research Network, 1998.
4. Canfora G., Garcia F., Piattini M., Ruiz F., and Visaggio C.A. A family of experiments to validate metrics for software process models. Journal Systems and Software 77 (2005) 113-129
5. Canfora G., Garcia F., Piattini M., Ruiz F., and Visaggio C.A. Applying a framework for the improvement of the software process maturity in a software company. Journal Software Practice and Experience 36 3 (2006) 283-304
6. M. Ciolkowski, F. Shull, S. Biffl, A family of experiments to investigate the influence of context on the effect of inspection techniques, in: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Empirical Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE), Keele (UK), 2002, pp. 48-60.
7. Cook J., and Wolf A. Software process validation: quantitatively measuring the correspondence of a process to a model. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 8 2 (1999) 147-176
8. Curtis B. Maintaining the software process. Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM) (1992), IEE Computer Society Press, Orlando, Florida 2-8
9. Florac W.A., and Carleton A.D. Measuring the software process. Statistical Process Control for Software Process Improvement (1999), Addison Wesley, Boston
10. A. Fuggetta, Software process: a roadmap, in: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Software Engineering, Limerick, Ireland, 2000, pp. 25-34.
11. García F., Ruiz F., Piattini M., and Polo M. Conceptual architecture for the assessment and improvement of software maintenance. Enterprise Information Systems IV (2003), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Hingham 219-226
12. García F., Ruiz F., Cruz J., and Piattini M. Integrated measurement for the evaluation and improvement of software processes. Proceedings of the 9th European Workshop on Software Process Technology (EWSPT'9). Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2786 (2003) 94-111
13. García F., Bertoa M.F., Calero C., Vallecillo A., Ruiz F., Piattini M., and Genero M. Towards a consistent terminology for software measurement. Information and Software Technology 48 8 (2006) 631-644
14. Goldenson D., Jarzombek J., and Rout T. Measurement and analysis in capability maturity model integration models and software process improvement. CROSSTALK The Journal of Defense Software Engineering 6 7 (2003) 20-24
15. Gruber T. Towards principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 43 5/6 (1995) 907-928
16. Meta Object Facility (MOF) Specification, version 1.4, Object Management Group (OMG), 2002.
17. Osterweil L.J. Software process are software too, revisited. Proceeding of the 19th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) (1997), ACM Press 540-548
18. Poels G., and Dedene G. Distance-based software measurement: necessary and sufficient properties for software measures. Information and Software Technology 42 1 (2000) 35-46
19. Ruiz F., Piattini M., García F., and Polo M. An XMI-based repository for software process metamodeling. Proceedings of Product Focused Software Process Improvement Conference (PROFES'2002). Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2559 (2002) 546-558
20. Software Process Engineering Metamodel Specification (SPEM); adopted specification, version 1.0, Object Management Group, November 2002.
21. C. Tautz, C.G. Von Wangenheim, REFSENO: a representation formalism for software engineering ontologies, version 1.1. 015.98/E. Fraunhofer IESE, 1998.
22. Vizcaino A., Favela J., Piattini M., and García F. Supporting software maintenance in web repositories through a multi-agent system. Proceedings of Atlantic Web Intelligence Conference (AWIC'03). Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2663 (2003) 307-317
23. XML Metadata Interchange (XMI) Specification, version 1.2, Object Management Group (OMG), 2002.