The impact of margin status on local recurrence following breast conserving therapy for invasive carcinoma in Manitoba

Journal of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 98, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 399-402

  Hardy, K ^a,b,d   Fradette, K ^c   Gheorghe, R ^a   Lucman, L ^a   Latosinsky, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c Epidemiology and Cancer Registry   (Canada)

^d ST JOSEPH S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Breast conserving therapy; Local recurrence; Margin status

Indexed keywords

ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CARCINOMA; CANADA; CANCER GROWTH; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE COURSE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INVASIVE CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASTECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MANITOBA; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; RADIOTHERAPY, ADJUVANT; REGISTRIES;

EID: 55749103200     PISSN: 00224790     EISSN: 10969098     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jso.21126     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al.: Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1233-1241.
2. Arriagada R, Le MG, Guinebretiere JM, et al.: Late local recurrences in a randomised trial comparing conservative treatment with total mastectomy in early breast cancer patients. Ann Oncol 2003;14:1617-1622.
3. Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al.: Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1227-1232.
4. van Dongen JA, Voogd AC, Fentiman IS, et al.: Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:1143-1150.
5. Blichert-Toft M, Rose C, Andersen JA, et al.: Danish randomized trial comparing breast conservation therapy with mastectomy: Six years of life-table analysis. Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1992;11:19-25.
6. Poggi MM, Danforth DN, Sciuto LC, et al.: Eighteen-year results in the treatment of early breast carcinoma with mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy: The National Cancer Institute Randomized Trial. Cancer 2003;98:697-702.
7. Effects of radiotherapy and surgery in early breast cancer. An overview of the randomized trials. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1444-1455.
8. Huston TL, Simmons RM: Locally recurrent breast cancer after conservation therapy. Am J Surg 2005;189:229-235.
9. Klimberg VS, Harms S, Korourian S: Assessing margin status. Surg Oncol 1999;8:77-84.
10. Singletary SE: Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. Am J Surg 2002;184:383-393.
11. Schwartz GF, Veronesi U, Clough KB, et al.: Proceedings of the Consensus Conference on Breast Conservation, April 28 to May 1, 2005, Milan, Italy. Cancer 2006;107:242-250.
12. Early Breast Cancer Working Group. Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of early breast cancer. Australia: National Health and Medical Research; Council 2001.
13. NCCN. Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Breast Cancer (Version 2.2007). 2007 © National Comprehensive Cancer; Network, Inc. Fort Washington, PA, 2007; Available at www.nccn.org/professionals/physicians_gls/ pdf/breast.pdf [Accessed October10, 2007].
14. Hardy K, McKay A, Latosinsky S: The impact of margin status on the local recurrence of invasive carcinoma following breast conserving therapy: A systematic review. Can J Surg 2007;50: 307.
15. Kostyra J: CancerCare Manitoba. Personal Communication, December 2007.
16. Turner DHK, Fradette K, Latosinsky S: Same question, different data source, different answer? Data source agreement for surgical procedures on women with breast cancer. Accepted for publication Healthcare Policy.
17. Holland R, Veling SH, Mravunac M, et al.: Histologic multi-focality of Tis, T1-2breast carcinomas. Implications for clinical trials of breast-conserving surgery. Cancer 1985;56: 979-990.
18. Leong C, Boyages J, Jayasinghe UW, et al.: Effect of margins on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast conservation therapy for lymph node-negative breast carcinoma. Cancer 2004;100:1823-1832.
19. Cochrane RA, Valasiadou P, Wilson AR, et al.: Cosmesis and satisfaction after breast-conserving surgery correlates with the percentage of breast volume excised. Br J Surg 2003;90:1505-1509.
20. Al-Ghazal SK, Blamey RW, Stewart J, et al.: The cosmetic outcome in early breast cancer treated with breast conservation. Eur J Surg Oncol 1999;25:566-570.
21. Clarke M, Collins R, Darby S, et al.: Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: An overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 2005;366:2087-2106.