Market access asymmetry in food trade

Review of World Economics

Volumn 144, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 509-537

  Olper, Alessandro ^a   Raimondi, Valentina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

Author keywords

Asymmetry; Food trade; Gravity; Market access; NTBs

Indexed keywords

EID: 55749100146     PISSN: 16102878     EISSN: 16102886     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10290-008-0158-8     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Anderson, J. E. (1979). A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation. American Economic Review 69 (1): 106-116.
2. Anderson, J. E., and J. P. Neary (2005). Measuring the Restrictiveness of International Trade Policy. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
3. Anderson, J. E., and E. van Wincoop (2003). Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle. American Economic Review 93 (1): 170-192.
4. Anderson, J. E., and E. van Wincoop (2004). Trade Costs. Journal of Economic Literature XLII (3): 691-751.
5. Bergstrand, J. H. (1989). The Generalized Gravity Equation, Monopolistic Competition and the Factor-Proportion Theory in International Trade. Review of Economics Statistics 71 (1): 143-153.
6. Bouët, A., Y. Décreux, L. Fontagné, S. Jean, and D. Laborde (2008). Assessing Applied Protection across the World. Review of International Economics (forthcoming).
7. Brusch, L., and E. Reinhart (1999). Industrial Location and Protection: The Political and Economic Geography of U.S. Nontariff Barriers. American Journal of Political Science 43 (4): 1028-1050.
8. Bureau, J. C., and L. Salvatici (2004a). WTO Negotiation on Market Access: What We Know, What We Don't and What We Should. In G. Anania, M. Bhoman, C. Carter, and A. McCalla (eds.), Agricultural Policy Reform and the WTO. Where Are We Heading? Cheltenam: Edward Elgar.
9. Bureau, J. C., and L. Salvatici (2004b). WTO Negotiation on Market Access in Agriculture: A Comparison of Alternative Tariff Cut Proposals for the EU and the US. Topics in Economic Analysis & Policy 4 (1): 1-33.
10. Chen, N. (2004). Intra-National versus International Trade in the European Union: Why Do National Border Matter? Journal of International Economics 63 (1): 93-118.
11. Combes, P.-P., M. Lafourcade, and T. Mayer (2005). The Trade-Creating Effects of Business and Social Networks: Evidence from France. Journal of International Economics 66 (1): 1-29.
12. Deardorff, A. V. (1998). Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassic World. In J. A. Frankel (ed.), The Regionalization of the World Economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13. Disdier, A. C., and T. Mayer (2007). Je t'aime, moi non plus: Bilateral Opinions and International Trade. European Journal of Political Economy 23 (4): 1140-1159.
14. Dixit, A. K., and E. Stiglitz (1977). Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity. American Economic Review 67 (3): 297-308.
15. Eaton, G., and S. Kortum (2002). Technology, Geography and Trade. Econometrica 70 (5): 1241-1279.
16. Evans, C. L. (2003). The Economic Significance of National Border Effects. American Economic Review 93 (4): 1291-1312.
17. Feenstra, R. (2004). Advanced International Trade. Theory and Evidence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
18. Ferrantino, M. (2006). Quantifying the Trade and Economic Effect of Non-Tariff Measures. OECD Trade Policy Working Paper No. 28.
19. Fontagné, L., T. Mayer, and S. Zignago (2005). Trade in the Triad: How Easy Is the Access to Large Markets? Canadian Journal of Economics 38 (4): 1401-1430.
20. Furtan, W. H., and B. M. van Melle (2004). Canada's Agricultural Trade in North America: Do National Borders Matter?' Review of Agricultural Economics 26 (3): 317-331.
21. Gallezot, J. (2003). Real Access to the EU's Agricultural Market. Mimeo, UMR Economie publique INRA-INAPG, Paris: Institute National de la Recherche Agronomique.
22. Haveman, J., U. Nair-Reichert, and J. G. Thursby (2003). How Effective Are Trade Barriers? An Analysis of Trade Reduction, Diversion and Compression. Review of Economics and Statistics 85 (2): 488-485.
23. Head, K., and T. Mayer (2000). Non-Europe: The Magnitude and Causes of Market Fragmentation in Europe. Weltwirschaftliches Archiv/Review of World Eco nomics 136 (2): 285-314.
24. Head, K., and T. Mayer (2002). Illusory Border Effects: Distance Mismeasurement Inflates Estimates of Bias in Trade. CEPII Discussion Paper No. 2002-01.
25. Head, K., and J. Ries (2001). Increasing Return vs. National Product Differentiation as an Explanation for the Pattern of US-Canada trade. American Economic Review 91 (4): 848-876.
26. Hillberry, R. (1999). Explaining the H̀ome Bias': What Can Be Learned from Disaggregated Commodity Flow Data? Indiana University Graduate Student Eco nomics Working Paper Series No. 9802.
27. Hillberry, R. (2002). Aggregation Bias, Compositional Change, and the Border Effect. Canadian Journal of Economics 35 (3): 517-530.
28. Hillberry, R., and D. Hummels (2002). Explain Home Bias in Consumption: The Role of Intermediate Input Trade. Working Paper, Purdue University.
29. Kee, H. L., A. Nicita, and M. Olarreaga (2006). Estimating Trade Restrictive Index. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3840.
30. Krugman, P. (1980). Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade. American Economic Review 70 (5): 950-959.
31. Lopez, R., E. Pagoulatos, and M. A. Gonzales (2006). Home Bias and US Imports of Processed Foods. North American Journal of Trade and Finance 17 (3): 367-392.
32. Manova, K. (2006). Credit Constraints, Heterogeneous Firms, and International Trade. Working Paper, November 2006, Harvard University.
33. Mayer, T., and S. Zignago (2005). Market Access in Global and Regional Trade. Working Paper 2005-02. Centre d'Etudes Prospectives et d'Informations Internationales (CEPII). Paris: CEPII.
34. McCallum, J. (1995). National Borders Matter: Canada-U.S. Regional Trade Patterns. American Economic Review 85 (3): 615-623.
35. Messerlin, P. (2001). Measuring the Costs of Protection in Europe: European Commercial Policy in the 2000s. Washington, D.C.: Institute of International Economics.
36. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2003). Structural Statistics for Industry and Services 1993-2000. Paris: OECD Publishing.
37. Olper, A., and V. Raimondi (2006). Explaining the Border Effects: The Role of Policy and Non-Policy Barriers in the Quad Food Trade. Paper presented at the IATRC Summer Symposium, Bonn, 28-30 May.
38. Rauch, J. E. (1999). Networks versus Markets in International Trade. Journal of International Economic 48 (1): 7-35.
39. Sheldon, I. (2005). Monopolistic Competition and Trade: Does the Theory Carry any Empirical Weight'?. Paper presented at the Winter Meeting of the IATRC, San Diego, CA, 4-6 December, 2005.
40. Wei, S.-J. (1996). Intra-National versus International Trade: How Stubborn are Nations in Global Integration? NBER Working Paper No. 5531.
41. Wolf, H. C. (2000). International Home Bias in Trade. Review of Economics and Statistics 82 (4): 555-569.