Faithful representation of stimuli with a population of integrate-and-fire neurons

Neural Computation

Volumn 20, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 2715-2744

  Lazar, Aurel A ^a   Pnevmatikakis, Eftychios A ^a  

^a Columbia University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; NERVE CELL; NERVE CELL NETWORK; PHYSIOLOGY; TIME;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ANIMALS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NERVE NET; NEURONS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 55749099947     PISSN: 08997667     EISSN: 1530888X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/neco.2008.06-07-559     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Christensen, O. (2003). An introduction to frames and riesz bases. Boston: Birkhäuser.
2. Deneve, S., Latham, P., & Pouget, A. (1999). Reading population codes: A natural implementation of ideal observers. Nature Neuroscience, 2(8), 740-745.
3. Eldar, Y. C., & Werther, T. (2005). General framework for consistent sampling in Hilbert spaces. International Journal of Wavelets, Multiresolution and Information Processing, 3(3), 347-359.
4. Fain, G. L. (2003). Sensory transduction. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
5. Hudspeth, A., & Konishi, M. (2000). Auditory neuroscience: Development, transduction and integration. PNAS, 97(22), 11690-11691.
6. Huys, Q. J. M., Zemel, R. S., Natarajan, R., & Dayan, P. (2007). Fast population coding. Neural Computation, 19, 404-441.
7. Jaffard, S. (1991). A density criterion for frames of complex exponentials. Michigan Mathematical Journal, 38(3), 339-348.
8. Lazar, A. A. (2005). Multichannel time encoding with integrate-and-fire neurons. Neurocomputing, 65-66, 401-407.
9. Lazar, A. A. (2006a). Time encoding machines with multiplicative coupling, feedback and feedforward. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs, 53(8), 672-676.
10. Lazar, A. A. (2006b). Recovery of stimuli encoded with a Hodgkin-Huxley neuron (Bionet Tech. Rep. 3-06). New York: Department of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University.
11. Lazar, A. A. (2007). Information representation with an ensemble of Hodgkin-Huxley neurons. Neurocomputing, 70, 1764-1771.
12. Lazar, A. A., & Tóth, L. T. (2004). Perfect recovery and sensitivity analysis of time encoded bandlimited signals. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems - I: Regular Papers, 51(10), 2060-2073.
13. Masland, R. (2001). The fundamental plan of retina. Nature Neuroscience, 4(9), 877-886.
14. Olshausen, B. A. (2002). Sparse codes and spikes. In R. P. N. Rao, B. A. Olshausen, & M. S. Lewicki (Eds.), Probabilistic models of the brain: Perception and neural function. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Patterson, R., Robinson, K., Holdsworth, J., McKeown, D., Zhang, C., & Allerhand, M. (1992). Complex sounds and auditory images. Advances in the Biosciences, 83, 429-446.
16. Rieke, F., Warland, D., de Ruyter van Steveninck, R., & Bialek, W. (1997). Spikes: Exploring the neural code. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Sanger, T. (2003). Neural population codes. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13, 238-249.
18. Slaney, M. (1998). Auditory toolbox for Matlab (Tech. Rep. No. 1998-10). Palo Alto, CA: Interval Research Corporation.
19. Smith, E., & Lewicki, M. S. (2005). Efficient coding of time-relative structure using spikes. Neural Computation, 17, 19-45.
20. Teolis, A. (1998). Computational signal processing with wavelets. Boston: Birkhäuser.
21. Tripp, B., & Eliasmith, C. (2007). Neural populations can induce reliable postsynaptic currents without observable spike rate changes or precise spike timing. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 1830-1840.