A defense of deception on scientific grounds

Social Psychology Quarterly

Volumn 71, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 215-221

  Cook, Karen S ^a,b   Yamagishi, Toshio ^c  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (United States)

^c HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 55749086222     PISSN: 01902725     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/019027250807100303     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Blount, Sally and Max H. Bazerman. 1996. "The Inconsistent Evaluation of Absolute versus Comparative Payoffs in Labor Supply and Bargaining." Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 30:227-240.
2. Brandt, Jordi and Gary Charness. 2000. "Hot vs. Cold: Sequential Responses and Preference Stability in Experimental Games." Experimental Economics 2:227-238.
3. Brosig, Jeannette, Joachim Weimann, and Chun-Lei Yang. 2001. "The Hot versus Cold Effect in a Simple Bargaining Experiment." Journal of Experimental Economics 6:75-90.
4. Eckel, Catherine. 2007. "Economic Games for Social Scientists." Pp. 497-516 in Laboratory Experiments in the Social Sciences edited by Murray Webster, Jr. and Jane Sell. Elsevier: New York.
5. Falk, Amin, Ernst Fehr, and Urs Fischbacher. 2003. "On the Nature of Fair Behavior." Economic Inquiry 41:20-26.
6. Güth, Werner, Steffen Huck, and Wieland Müller. 2001. "The Relevance of Equal Splits in Ultimatum Games." Games and Economic Behavior 37:161-169.
7. Hertwig, Ralph and Andreas Ortmann. 2001. "Experimental Practices in Economics: A Methodological Challenge for Psychologists?" Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24:383-451.
8. Horita, Yutaka. 2008. "Motivational Bases of Rejection Choice in the Ultimatum and Related Games: Inequity Aversion, Reciprocity, and Identity." Master's Thesis submitted to the Department of Behavioral Science, Hokkaido University, Japan.
9. Horita, Yutaka, and Toshio Yamagishi. 2007a. "Reciprocity and Identity Protection: Reasons for Rejection in the Ultimatum Game." The Japanese Journal of Psychology 78:446-51.
10. Horita, Yutaka, and Toshio Yamagishi. 2007b. "Rejection of Unintentionally Unfair Offers in an Ultimatum Game." Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meetings of the Japanese Group Dynamics Association: 58-59.
11. Milgram, Stanley. 1974. Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View. Harper/Collins.
12. Ohira, Hideki. 1989. "Effects of Mitigating Information on Arousal and Retaliatory Aggression. Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 28: 95-104.
13. Oosterbeek, Hessel, Randolph Sloof, and Gus van de Kuilen. 2004. "Cultural Differences in Ultimatum Game Experiments: Evidence from a Meta-analysis. Experimental Economics 7: 171-188.
14. Takagishi, Haruto, Nobuyuki Takahashi, and Toshio Yamagishi. In press. "The Role of Intentions in Third-party Punishment." Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.
15. Takahashi, Nobuyuki and Rie Mashima. 2005. "Does Intention Matter in Third-party Punishment?" Paper presented at the 17th Annual Meetings of Human Behavior and Evolution Society, Austin, TX. June 1-5.
16. Wilson, Rick K. and R. Mark Isaac. 2007. "Political Economy and Experiments." Pp 1, 4-7 in The Political Economist: Newsletter of the Section on Political Economy, edited by William Bernhard and J. Lawrence Broz. American Political Science Association. Volume XIV, Issue 1 (Winter).