Phylogenetic signals in morphometric data

Morphology, Shape and Phylogeny

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 100-138

  MacLeod, Norman ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 55649121634     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/9780203165171     Document Type: Chapter

References (75)

1. Adams, D. C. and Rosenberg, M. S. (1998) ‘Partial warps, phylogeny, and ontogeny: a comment on Zelditch and Fink (1995)', Systematic Biology, 47, 168-173.
2. Adrain, J. M. and Edgecombe, G. D. (1997) ‘Silurian encrinurine trilobites from the central Canadian Arctic’, Palaeontographica Canadiana, 14, 1-109.
3. Almeida, M. T. and Bisbey, F. A. (1984) ‘A simple method for establishing taxonomic characters from measurement data’, Taxon, 33, 405-409.
4. Archie, J. W. (1985) ‘Methods for coding variable morphological features for numeric taxonomic analysis’, Systematic Zoology, 34, 326-345.
5. Baum, B. R. (1988) ‘A simple procedure for establishing discrete characters from measurement data, applicable to cladistics’, Taxon, 37, 63-70.
6. Blackith, R. E. and Reyment, R. A. (1971) Multivariate morphometrics, London: Academic Press.
7. Bookstein, F., Chernoff, B., Elder, R., Humphries, J., Smith, G. and Strauss, R. (1985) Morphometrics in evolutionary biology, Special Publication 15, Philadelphia: The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia.
8. Bookstein, F. L. (1986) ‘Size and shape spaces for landmark data in two dimensions’, Statistical Science, 1, 181-242.
9. Bookstein, F. L. (1990) ‘Analytic methods: introduction and overview’, in Rohlf, F. J. and Bookstein, F. L. (eds) Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop, Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, Special Publication 2, pp. 61-74.
10. Bookstein, F. L. (1991) Morphometric tools for landmark data: geometry and biology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Bookstein, F. L. (1993) ‘A brief history of the morphometric synthesis’, in Marcus, L. F., Bello, E. and García-Valdecasas, A. (eds) Contributions to morphometrics, Madrid: Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales 8, pp. 18-40.
12. Bookstein, F. L. (1994) ‘Can biometrical shape be a homologous character?', in Hall, B. K. (ed.) Homology: the hierarchical basis of comparative biology, San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 197-227.
13. Bookstein, F. L. (1996) ‘Combining the tools of geometric morphometrics’, in Marcus, L. F., Corti, M., Loy, A., Naylor, G. J. P. and Slice, D. E. (eds) Advances in morphometrics, New York: Plenum Press, pp. 131-151.
14. Bookstein, F. L. (1997) ‘Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: localizing group differences in outline shape’, Medical Image Analysis, 1, 225-243.
15. Chapill, J. A. (1989) ‘Quantitative characters in phylogenetic analysis’, Cladistics, 5, 217-234.
16. Colless, D. H. (1980) ‘Congruence between morphological and allozyme data for Menidia: a reappraisal’, Systematic Zoology, 29, 288-299.
17. Cranston, P. S. and Humphries, C. J. (1988) ‘Cladistics and computers: a chironomid conundrum’, Cladistics, 4, 72-92.
18. Crisp, M. and Weston, P. (1987) ‘Cladistics and legume systematics, with an analysis of the Bossiaeeae, Brongniartieae and Mirbelieae’, in Stirton, C. (ed.) Advances in legume systematics, part 3, Kew: Royal Botanical Gardens, pp. 65-130.
19. Crowe, T. M. (1994) ‘Morphometrics, phylogenetic models and cladistics: means to an end or much ado about nothing?', Cladistics, 10, 77-84.
20. Darwin, C. (1859) On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life, London: John Murray.
21. Eldredge, N. and Cracraft, J. (1980) Phylogenetic patterns and the evolutionary process, New York: Columbia University Press.
22. Falconer, D. S. (1981) Introduction to quantitative genetics, London: Longman.
23. Farris, J. S. (1990) ‘Phenetics in camouflage’, Cladistics, 6, 91-100.
24. Farris, J. S., Kluge, A. and Eckhardt, M. (1970) ‘A numerical approach to phylogenetic systematics’, Systematic Zoology, 19, 172-189.
25. Felsenstein, J. (1985) ‘Phylogenies and the comparative method’, American Naturalist, 125, 1-15.
26. Felsenstein, J. (1988) ‘Phylogenies and quantitative characters’, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 19, 445-471.
27. Fink, W. L. and Zelditch, M. L. (1995) ‘Phylogenetic analysis of ontogenetic shape transformations: a reassessment of the Piranha genus Pygocentrus’, Systematic Biology, 44, 343-360.
28. Goldman, N. (1988) ‘Methods for discrete coding of morphological characters for numerical analysis’, Cladistics, 4, 59-71.
29. Harvey, P. H. and Pagel, M. D. (1991) The comparative method in evolutionary biology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. Hennig, W. (1966) Phylogenetic systematics, Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
31. Kitching, I. J., Forey, P. L., Humphries, C. J. and Williams, D. M. (1998) Cladistics: the theory and practice of parsimony analysis, 2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. Lynch, J. M., Wood, C. G., and Luboga, S. A. (1996) ‘Geometric morphometrics in primatology: craniofacial variation in Homo sapiens and Pan troglodytes’, Folia Primatologia, 67, 15-39.
33. MacLeod, N. (1999) ‘Generalizing and extending the eigenshape method of shape visualization and analysis’, Paleobiology, 25, 107-138.
34. MacLeod, N. (2001) ‘The role of phylogeny in quantitative paleobiological analysis’, Paleobiology, 27, 226-241.
35. MacLeod, N. ‘Landmarks, localization, and the use of morphometrics in phylogenetic analysis’, in Edgecombe, G., Adrain, J. and Lieberman, B. (eds) Fossils, phylogeny, and form: an analytical approach, New York: Plenum (in press).
36. MacLeod, N. and Rose, K. D. (1993) ‘Inferring locomotor behavior in Paleogene mammals via eigenshape analysis’, American Journal of Science, 293-A, 300-355.
37. Mayr, E. (1982) The growth of biological thought: diversity, evolution, and inheritance, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
38. Michevich, M. F. and Johnson, M. F. (1976) ‘Congruence between morphological and allozyme data’, Systematic Zoology, 25, 260-270.
39. Monterio, L. R. (2000) ‘Why morphometrics is special: the problem with using partial warps as characters for phylogenetic inference’, Systematic Biology, 49, 796-800.
40. Naylor, G. J. P. (1996) ‘Can partial warps scores be used as cladistic characters?', in Marcus, L. F., Corti, M., Loy, A., Naylor, G. J. P. and Slice, D. E. (eds) Advances in morphometrics, New York: Plenum Press, pp. 519-530.
41. Nelson, G. (1989) ‘Species and taxa: systematics and evolution’, in Otte, D. and Endler, J. A. (eds) Speciation and its consequences, New York: Plenum, pp. 63-81.
42. Nelson, G. and Platnick, N. (1981) Systematics and biogeography: cladistics and vicariance, New York: Columbia University Press.
43. Otte, D. and Endler, J. A. (1989) Speciation and its consequences, Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.
44. Owen, R. (1843) Lectures on comparative anatomy of the invertebrate animals, delivered at the Royal College of Surgeons in 1843, London: Longman, Brown, Green, and Longman.
45. Patterson, C. (1982) ‘Morphological characters and homology’, in Joysey, K. A. and Friday, A. E. (eds) Problems of phylogenetic reconstruction, London and New York: Academic Press, pp. 21-74.
46. Pimentel, R. A. and Riggins, R. (1987) ‘The nature of cladistic data’, Cladistics, 3, 201-209.
47. Rae, T. (1995) ‘Continuous characters and fossil taxa in phylogenetic reconstruction’, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Supplement 20, 176-177.
48. Rae, T. C. (1998) ‘The logical basis for the use of continuous characters in phylogenetic systematics’, Cladistics, 14, 221-228.
49. Rieppel, O. (1980) ‘Homology, a deductive concept’, Zeitschrift für Zoolgische, Systematik und Evolutionforschung, 18, 315-319.
50. Rieppel, O. (1994) ‘Homology, topology, and typology: the history of modern debates’, in Hall, B. K. (ed.) Homology: the hierarchical basis of comparative biology, London: Academic Press, pp. 63-100.
51. Reyment, R. A. (1991) Multidimensional paleobiology, Oxford: Pergamon Press.
52. Reyment, R. A., Blackith, R. E. and Campbell, N. A. (1984) Multivariate morphometrics 2nd edn, London: Academic Press.
53. Rohlf, F. J. (1990) ‘Rotational fit (Procrustes) methods’, in Rohlf, F. J. and Bookstein, F. L. (eds) Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, Special Publication No. 2, pp. 227-236.
54. Rohlf, F. J. (1998) ‘On applications of geometric morphometrics to studies of ontogeny and phylogeny’, Systematic Biology, 47, 147-158.
55. Simon, C. (1983) ‘A new coding procedure for morphometric data with an example from periodical cicada wing veins’, in Felsenstein, J. (ed.) Numerical taxonomy, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 378-382.
56. Smith, A. B. (1994) Systematics and the fossil record: documenting evolutionary patterns. London: Blackwell.
57. Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J. (1981) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 2nd edn, San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
58. Stevens, P. F. (1991) ‘Character states, morphological variation, and phylogenetic analysis: a review’, Systematic Botany, 16, 553-583.
59. Strait, D., Moniz, M. and Strait, P. (1996) ‘Finite mixture coding: a new approach to coding continuous characters’, Systematic Biology, 45, 67-78.
60. Strauss, R. E. and Bookstein, F. L. (1982) ‘The truss: body form reconstruction in morphometrics’, Systematic Zoology, 31, 113-135.
61. Stuessy, T. F. (1990) Plant taxonomy: the systematic evaluation of comparative data, New York: Columbia University Press.
62. Swiderski, D. L., Zelditch, M. L. and Fink, W. L. (1998) ‘Why morphometrics is not special: coding quantitative data for phylogenetic analysis’, Systematic Biology, 47, 508-519.
63. Thiele, K. (1993) ‘The holy grail of the perfect character: the cladistic treatment of morphometric data’, Cladistics, 9, 275-304.
64. Thiele, K. and Ladiges, P. Y. (1988) ‘A cladistic analysis of Angophora Cav. (Myrtaccae)', Cladistics, 4, 23-42.
65. Thompson, D. W. (1917) On growth and form, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66. Thorpe, R. S. (1984) ‘Coding morphometric characters for constructing distance Wagner networks’, Evolution, 38, 244-355.
67. Wagner, G. P. (1994) ‘Homology and the mechanisms of development’, in Hall, B. K. (ed.) Homology: the hierarchical basis of comparative biology, San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 273-299.
68. Wiley, E. O. (1981) Phylogenetics: the theory and practice of phylogenetic systematics, New York: Wiley.
69. Zahn, C. T. and Roskies, R. Z. (1972) ‘Fourier descriptors for plane closed curves’, IEEE Transactions, Computers, C-21, 269-281.
70. Zar, J. H. (1974) Biostatistical analysis, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
71. Zelditch, M. L., Bookstein, F. L. and Lundrigan, B. L. (1992) ‘Ontogeny of integrated skull growth in the cotton rat Sigmodon fulviventer’, Evolution, 46, 1164-1180.
72. Zelditch, M. L. and Fink, W. L. (1995) ‘Allometry and developmental integration of body growth in a piranha Pygocentrus nattereri (Teleosti: Ostariophysi)', Journal of Morphology, 223, 341-355.
73. Zelditch, M. L. and Fink, W. L. (1998) ‘Partial warps, ontogeny, and phylogeny: a reply to Adams and Rosenberg’, Systematic Biology, 47, 345-348.
74. Zelditch, M. L., Fink, W. L. and Swiderski, D. L. (1995) ‘Morphometrics, homology, and phylogenetics: quantified characters as synapomorphies’, Systematic Biology, 44, 179-189.
75. Zelditch, M. L., Fink, W. L., Swiderski, D. L. and Lundrigan, B. L. (1998) ‘On applications of geometric morphometrics to studies of ontogeny and phylogeny: a reply to Rohlf’, Systematic Biology, 47, 159-167.