Geometric morphometrics in primatology: Craniofacial variation in homo sapiens and pan troglodytes

Folia Primatologica

Volumn 67, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 15-39

  Lynch, John M ^a   Wood, Chris G ^b   Luboga, Sam A ^c  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^c MAKERERE UNIVERSITY   (Uganda)

Author keywords

Allometry; Chimpanzee; Man; Morphometrics; Procrustes; Shape; Size; Thin plate spline

Indexed keywords

ABORIGINE; AFRICA; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; AUSTRALIA; FACE; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HOMINID; HUMAN; MALE; PAN TROGLODYTES; SKULL; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

AFRICA; ANIMALS; AUSTRALIA; FACE; FEMALE; HOMINIDAE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, STRUCTURAL; OCEANIC ANCESTRY GROUP; PAN TROGLODYTES; SKULL; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0007033446     PISSN: 00155713     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000157203     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Hanken J, Hall BK: The Skull, Chicago, Chicago University Press, 1993.
2. van Vark GN, Howells WW: Multivariate Statistical Methods in Physical Anthropology. Dordrecht. Reidel Publishing Co. 1984.
3. James FC, McCulloch CE: Multivariate analysis in ecology and systematics: Panacea or Pandora's Box. Annu Rev Ecol System 1990:21:129-166.
4. Wood BA, Li Y, Willoughby C: lntraspedfic variation and sexual dimorphism in cranial and dental variation among higher primates, and their bearing on the hominid fossil record. J Anat 1991:174:185-205.
5. Bookstein FL: Morphometrie Tools for Landmark Data. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 1991.
6. Rohlf FJ, Marcus LF: A revolution in morphometries. TREE 1993:8:129-132.
7. Corti M: Geometric morphometries: An extension of the revolution. TREE 1993:8:302-303.
8. Reyment RA, Blackith RE, Campbell NA: Multivariate Morphometries. London. Academic Press. 1984.
9. Corruccini RS: Univariate versus multivariate morphometric variation: An alternative viewpoint. Syst Zoo! 1987:36:396-397.
10. Willig MR, Owen RD, Colbert RL: Assessment of morphometric variation in natural populations: The inadequacy of the univariate approach. Syst Zool 1986:35:195-203.
11. Willig MR, Owen RD: Univariate analyses of morphometric variation do not emulate the results of multivariate analyses. Syst Zool 1987:36:398 400.
12. Albrecht GI, Miller JMA: Geographic variation in primates: A review with implications for interpreting fossils: in Kimbel WH. Marlin LB (cels): Species. Species Concepts and Primate Evolution. New York. Plenum Press, 1993, pp 123-161.
13. Oxnard CE: The Order of Man: A Biomathematical Anatomy of the Primates. New Haven. Yale University Press. 1984.
14. Thompson DAW: On Growth and Form. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. 1917.
15. Bookslein FL: The Measurement of Biological Shape and Shape Change. Berlin. Springer. 1978.
16. Thompson RDA (ed): D'Arcy Thompson: The Scholar-Naturalist. London. Oxford University Press. 1958.
17. Bookslein FL, Chernoff B, Elder RL, Humphries JM, Smith GR, Strauss RE: Morphometries in Evolutionary Biology. Philadelphia. Academy of Natural Sciences. 1985.
18. Bookslein FL: Orthogenesis of the hominids: An exploration using biorthogonal grids. Science 1977: 901-904.
19. Bookslein FL: Modelling differences in cranial form, with examples from primates: in.lungers Wl. (ed): Size and Scaling in Primate Biology. New York. Plenum Press. 1985. pp 207-229.
20. Richtsmeier JT: Applications of finite-element scaling analysis in primatology. Folia Primatol 1989:53: 50-64.
21. Bookstein FL: Describing a craniofacial anomaly: Finte elements and the biometries of landmark locations. Am J Phys Anlhropol 1987;74:495-509.
22. Chcverud JM: A comparative analysis of morphological variation patterns in the Papionins. Evolution 1989: 43:1737-1747.
23. Chcverud JM, Lewis JL, Bachrach W, Lew WD: The measurement of form and variation in form: An application of three-dimensional quantitative morphology by finite-element methods. Am J Phvs Anlhropol 1983: 62:151-165.
24. Cheverud JM, Richtsmeier JT: Finite-element scaling applied to sexual dimorphism in rhesus macaque (Macaca imtlaila) facial growth. Syst Zool 1956:35:381-399.
25. Leigh SR, Chcverud JM: Sexual dimorphism in the baboon facial skeleton. Am J Phys Anlhropol 1991:84:193-208.
26. Corner BD, Richtsmeier JT: Morphometric analysis of craniofacial growth in Ccbus apella. Am J Phys Anthropol 1991:84:323-342.
27. Richtsmeier JT, Iele S: A coordinate-free approach to the analysis of growth patterns: Models and theoretical considerations. Biol Rev 1993:68:381-411.
28. Richtsmeier JT, Corner BD, Grausz HM, Chcverud JM, Danahey SE: The role of postnatal growth pattern in the production of facial morphology. Syst Biol 1993:42:307-330.
29. Richtsmeier JT, Walker A: A morphometric study of facial growth; in Walker A. Leakey R (eds): The Nariokotome Homo credits Skeleton. Cambridge. Harvard University Press. 1993. pp 391-410.
30. Bookstein FL: Sie and shape spaces for landmark data in two dimensions (with discussion and rejoinder). Stati Sci 1986:1:181-242.
31. Bookstein FL, Sampson PD: Statistical models for geometric components of shape change. Commun Stat 1990;19:1939-1971.
32. O'Higgins P, Dryden 1L: Studies of craniofacial development and evolution. Archaeol Oceania 1992:27:95-104.
33. O'Higgins P, Dryden II.: Sexual dimorphism in hominoids: Further studies of craniofacial shape differences in Pan, Gorilla and Pongo. J Hum Evol 1993;24:183-205.
34. Holcomb SMC, Königsberg IW: Statistical study of sexual dimorphism in the human fetal sciatic notch. Am J Phys Anthropol 1995:97:113-125.
35. Bookstein FL: "Size and Shape': A comment on semantics. Syst Zool 1989;38:173-180.
36. Lcle S. Richtsmeier JT: Statistical models in morphometries: Are they realistic? Syst Zool 1990:39:60-69.
37. Mosiman JE: Size allometrv: Size and shape variables with characterizations of the log-normal and generalized gamma distributions. J Am Stat Assoc 1970:65:930-945.
38. Mardia KV, Dryden I: The statistical analysis of shape data. Biometrika 1989:76:271-282.
39. Goodall C: Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape. J R Stat Soc 1991:53:285-339.
40. Dryden IL, Marida KV: Size and shape analysis of landmark data. Biometrika 1992:79:57-68.
41. Rohlf FJ: Relative warp analysis and an example of its application to mosquito wings; in Marcus LF. Bello E. García-Valdecasas A (eds): Contributions to Morphometries. Madrid. Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales and CSIC, 1993, pp 131-159.
42. Bookstein FL: A standard formula for the uniform shape component in landmark data: in Marcus LF. Corti M. Loy A. Slice D. Naylor GJP (eds): Advances in Morphometries. New York. Plenum Press. 1996. pp 153-168.
43. Sneath PHA: Trend-surface analysis of transformation grids. J Zool (Lond) 1967;151:65-122.
44. Bookstein FL: Principal warps: Thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE Trans Pat Anal Mach Int 1989:11:567-585.
45. Bookstein FL: Combining the tools of geometric morphometries: in Marcus LK Corti M. Loy A. Slice D. Naylor GJP (eds): Advances in Morphometries. New York. Plenum Press, 1996, pp 131-151.
46. Bookstein FL: Biometrics, biomathematics and the morphometric synthesis. Bull Math Biol 1996:58: 313-365.
47. Luboga SA, Wood BA: Position and orientation of the foramen magnum in higher primates. Am J Phys Amhropol 1990:81:67-76.
48. Luboga SA: Morphometric Variation in the Cranial Base and Facial Skeleton of Higher Primates, with Special Reference to Modem Humans; PhD thesis University of Makcrere. Kampala. 1987.
49. Wood CG, Lynch JM: Sexual dimorphism in the craniofacial skeleton of modern humans: in Marcus LF. Corti M, Loy A. Slice D. Naylor GJP (eds): Advances in Morphometries. New York. Plenum Press. 1996. pp 407-414.
50. Slice DE: DS-DIGIT: Basic Digitizing Software. State University of New York at Stony Brook. Department of Ecology and Evolution. 1991.
51. Rohlf FJ. Slice D: Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst Zool 1990:39:40-59.
52. Slice DE: GRF-ND: Generalized Rotational Fitting of N-Dimensional Data. State University of New York at Stony Brook. Department of Ecology and Evolution, 1992.
53. Baylac M: XY. Paris. Musée d'Histoire Nalurclle. 1993.
54. Rohlf FJ: TPSRW: Thin-Plate Spline Relative Warp. State University of New York at Stony Brook. Department of Ecology and Evolution. 1993.
55. Rohlf FJ: TPSPLINE: Thin-Plate Splines. State University of New York at Stony Brook. Department of Ecology and Evolution. 1993.
56. Humphries J: VECTOR: A program for thin-plate spline analysis New' York. Cornell University. 1992.
57. Brown T: Morphology of the Australian Skull Studies by Multivariate Analysis. Canberra. Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, 1973.
58. Ross CF, Ravosa MJ: Basicranial flexion, relative brain size, and facial kyphosis in nonhuman primates. Am J Phys Amhropol 1993;91:305-324.
59. Dean MC, Wood BA: Metrical analysis of the basicranium of extant hominoids and Australopithecus. Am J Phys Amhropol 1981:54:63-71.
60. Dean MC, Wood BA: Basicranial anatomy of Plio-Pleistocene hominids from East and South Africa. Am J Phys Anthropol 1982:59:157-174.
61. Dean MC, Wood BA: Phylogeny. neotony and growth of the cranial base in hominoids. Folia Primatol 1984: 43:157-180.
62. Rohlf FJ, Bookstein FL (eds): Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometries Workshop. Ann Arbor. University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, 1990.
63. Richtsmeier JT, Cheverud JM, Lele S: Advances in anthropological morphometries. Annu Rev Anthropol 1992:21:283-305.
64. Carpenter K.E, Sommer HJ III, Marcus LF: Converting truss interlandmark distances to cartesian coordinates: in Marcus LF. Corti M. Loy A. Slice D. Naylor GJP (eds): Advances in Morphometries. New York. Plenum Press. 1996. pp 103-111.
65. Dean D: Tile Middle-Pleislocenc Homo erectus/H. sapiens Transition: New Evidence from Space Curve Statistics; PhD thesis City University of New York. 1993.
66. Bookstein FL: The morphometric synthesis for landmarks and edge-elemems in images. Terra Nova 1995:7: 393-407.
67. Yaroch LA: Characterization of Neanderthal Cranial Shape Using the Method of Thin-Plate Splines; PhD thesis University of Michigan. Ann Arbor. 1994.
68. Sw iderski DL: Morphological evolution of the scapula in tree squirrels, chipmunks and ground squirrels (Sci-uridae): An analysis using thin-plate splines. Evolution 1993:47:1854-1873.
69. Bookstein FL: Can biometrical shape be a homologous character? in Hall BK (ed): Homology: The Hierarchical Basis of Comparative Biology. San Diego. Academic Press. 1994. pp 197-227.
70. Fink WL, Zclditch ML: Phylogenetic analysis of ontogenetic shape transformations: A reassessment of the piranha genus Pygocentrus (Teleostei). Syst Biol 1995:44:343-360.
71. Zelditch ML, Fink WL: Allometry and developmental integration of body growth in a piranha. Pygocentrus nattereri (Teleostei: Ostariophysi). J Morphol 1995:223:341-355.
72. Naylor GJP: Can partial warp scores be used as cladistic characters? in Marcus LF. Corti M. Loy A, Slice D. Naylor GJP (eds): Advances in Morphometries. New York. Plenum Press. 1996. pp 519-530.
73. Herrera CM: Selection on floral morphology and environmental determinants of fecundity in a hawk moth-pollinated violet. Ecol Monogr 1993:63:251-275.
74. Kores PJ, Molvray M, Darw in SP: Morphometric variation in three species of Cyrtostylis (Orchidaceae). Syst Bot 1993:18:274-282.
75. Loy A, Corti M, Marcus LF: Lamini ark data: Size and shape analysis in systematics: A case study on Old World Talpidae (Mammalia. Insettivora); in Marcus LF. Bello E. García-Valdecasas A (eds): Contributions to Morphometries. Madrid, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturalesand CSIC, 1993, pp 215-239.
76. Budd AF. Johnson KG. Potts DC: Recognizing morphospecies in colonial reef corals. 1. Landmark-based methods. Paleobiology 1994:20:484-505.
77. Clyde WC, Gingerich PD: Rales of evolution in the denition of early Eocene Cantius: Comparison of size and shape. Paleobiology 1994:20:506-522.